Jump to content

User talk:Hi Balloon Boy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎October 2011: here's the deal, stop falsely accuse me of vandalism, you step back, I will do the same, others should add logical reasons not just mechanically change it or change it back
Line 50: Line 50:


::Please self-revert. You have removed a large amount of cited content without seeking a consensus for doing so. By doing it a ''second'' time, you have basically performed an act of vandalism. Failure to do so in a timely manner will lead to a formal warning. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 02:51, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
::Please self-revert. You have removed a large amount of cited content without seeking a consensus for doing so. By doing it a ''second'' time, you have basically performed an act of vandalism. Failure to do so in a timely manner will lead to a formal warning. -- [[User:Scjessey|Scjessey]] ([[User talk:Scjessey|talk]]) 02:51, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

:::Please stop acting like a bully. You have proven that you are a machine. You have no good reason. If someone else (not you) offers a good reason to reinsert 1 sentence, then that is good faith. If they offer good reasons to reinsert 2 sentences, then that is also good faith. By falsely accusing people of vandalism, you are poisoning Wikipedia. Here's what I will do. I will NOT make any more changes today and you should not either. If someone else has a good explanation, so be it. I hope you won't be a bully and threaten me or mechanically change it back. [[User:Hi Balloon Boy|Hi Balloon Boy]] ([[User talk:Hi Balloon Boy#top|talk]]) 02:55, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:55, 23 October 2011

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Hi Balloon Boy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Ahunt (talk) 20:26, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation for the typeface collaboration

Requesting editors' help

There is currently an oppened collaboration which aims in improving articles related to typefaces and font categorization. If you´re interested in this subject, please visit the collaboration page, add your self and see how you can help.

I hope you can contribute in this section. Happy editings! - Damërung . -- 20:32, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Back

Thanks for your note. Working on aircraft articles is one of my specialties here on Wikipedia. With over 3 million articles on Wikipedia right now it helps to narrow the field down a bit!- Ahunt (talk) 20:32, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: ?

Well, related to typography, there are several articles and images missing. You can see all the red links in List of fonts, and blank spaces (where there should be an image) in Samples of serif typefaces or Samples of display typefaces or Samples of script typefaces, etc... The goal of the collaboration is to upgrade and improve all those things. If you go to the collaboration page, you will find further information and open tasks as well as instructions about all this. That´s basically all.
This is a personal request for help in a task here in wikipedia. If you´re interested in collaborate, go ahead! - Damërung . -- 20:42, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was absent for some minutes... don´t worry about it, it will be developed over time, it´s just that it´s still too short to be even a stub. You can search for more information in one of the references I posted in the collaboration page. - Damërung . -- 21:22, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 20:56, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Dayewalker (talk)

Hi, I tried to fix the article a bit to adhere to the style of other typeface articles. If you want you can fill in the rest of the template. Jarkeld (talk) 21:11, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Barack Obama. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 02:39, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


I did clearly discuss why some trivial bits should not be in the article. The removed parts were a few sentences of laws that President Obama did not actively campaign for or make it a signature issue. If these are included, the article ceases to be "Barack Obama" but becomes "The World during President Obama's Life" Hi Balloon Boy (talk) 02:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because you deleted the cited content before first discussing it and seeking a consensus for such a drastic change, I restored it. Following your comment on the article talk page, I replied with my reasons for restoring the content. -- Scjessey (talk) 02:45, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please self-revert. You have removed a large amount of cited content without seeking a consensus for doing so. By doing it a second time, you have basically performed an act of vandalism. Failure to do so in a timely manner will lead to a formal warning. -- Scjessey (talk) 02:51, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop acting like a bully. You have proven that you are a machine. You have no good reason. If someone else (not you) offers a good reason to reinsert 1 sentence, then that is good faith. If they offer good reasons to reinsert 2 sentences, then that is also good faith. By falsely accusing people of vandalism, you are poisoning Wikipedia. Here's what I will do. I will NOT make any more changes today and you should not either. If someone else has a good explanation, so be it. I hope you won't be a bully and threaten me or mechanically change it back. Hi Balloon Boy (talk) 02:55, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]