Jump to content

Talk:Same-sex marriage in Rhode Island: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Kumi-Taskbot (talk | contribs)
Merge WikiProject United States Supported banners and cleanup, removed: |collapsed=yes| using AWB (7852)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=yes|1=
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell1=
{{LGBTProject | class=Start}}
{{WikiProject Rhode Island}}
{{WikiProject LGBT studies| class=Start}}
{{WPLAW|class=Start|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|RI=yes|RI-importance=}}
{{WikiProject Law|class=Start|importance=Low}}
}}
}}



Revision as of 14:56, 23 December 2011

{{WikiProjectBannerShell1=

WikiProject iconLGBT studies Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Rhode Island Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Rhode Island.
WikiProject iconLaw Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

}}

The link to the PDF file is valid, but the file is corrupt!

http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/cases/ri-ag-statement.pdf The link now properly works.

"recognize" in intro

"Currently Rhode Island is the only state in New England which does not recognize same-sex marriage" Is this right? Aren't same-sex marriages from other states, or at least Massachusetts, legally recognized by virtue of the RI Attorney General's perogative? jrun (talk) 08:34, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yes, you are correct. I think the AG's actions merely stated that RI did not prohibit same-sex marriage, so that made it valid for a RI couple to wed in Massachusetts because of Massachusett's former law. I don't think that it explicitly made the state recognize it, however, though it seems like that would be a rational conclusion IMO. 98.168.192.162 (talk) 04:59, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I found articles stating that Rhode Island DOES recognize out-of-state same-sex marriages.
http://www.marriageequalityri.org/www/learn/marriage_faq/
http://www.glad.org/uploads/docs/publications/ri-marriage-guide.pdf
http://www.freedomtomarry.org/states/
Native94080 (talk) 09:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Following news (cited in the article) explaining that same-sex marriage was rejected for 2011 and civil unions were recently passed by the RI House as a compromise, I moved the article to "Recognition of same-sex unions in Rhode Island" to reflect that it has as its subject three different recognition mechanisms. Once/if same-sex marriage is legalized, the article should be moved back to the previous "Same-sex marriage in Rhode Island", but right now the scope is not on marriage. Hekerui (talk) 21:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 1, 2011

It already is July 1 and the governor hasn't signed the bill yet, can somebody clarify the situation and when the bill is supposed to enter into force. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecad93 (talkcontribs) 08:49, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When the governor has not signed the bill it can't be in force yet. If he signs it, civil unions will likely become legal from the date on that he signs it. Hawaii had a similar issue with HB 444, which, if it had been signed, would have had a starting date in the past. However, from what I read in the The Honolulu Advertiser at the time, legal experts didn't see a problem. Hekerui (talk) 09:00, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]