Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of lists of lists: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→List of lists of lists: Keep but present no valid argument. |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''Keep.''' What is achieved by deleting this article, other than conformance to some arbitrary "standard"? There is plenty of handy information here, much of it not found collected elsewhere. The page is viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/List_of_lists_of_lists nearly 10,000 times a month], which in itself is a '''keep''' reason, to my mind. It offends no one, and serves a useful purpose; leave it alone. --[[User:Seduisant|Seduisant]] ([[User talk:Seduisant|talk]]) 01:35, 11 April 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Keep.''' What is achieved by deleting this article, other than conformance to some arbitrary "standard"? There is plenty of handy information here, much of it not found collected elsewhere. The page is viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/latest/List_of_lists_of_lists nearly 10,000 times a month], which in itself is a '''keep''' reason, to my mind. It offends no one, and serves a useful purpose; leave it alone. --[[User:Seduisant|Seduisant]] ([[User talk:Seduisant|talk]]) 01:35, 11 April 2012 (UTC) |
||
:*[[WP:ITSUSEFUL]], [[WP:HARMLESS]] are not valid arguments. You lose, try again. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|What did I screw up now?]])</sup> 02:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC) |
:*[[WP:ITSUSEFUL]], [[WP:HARMLESS]] are not valid arguments. You lose, try again. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|What did I screw up now?]])</sup> 02:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' per [[WP:ILIKEIT]] and [[WP:IGNORE]]. <!-- I know these aren't valid arguments, but I do like it --> [[User:Pburka|Pburka]] ([[User talk:Pburka|talk]]) 03:13, 11 April 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:13, 11 April 2012
- List of lists of lists (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No context. No purpose. The content is mainly composed of dab pages (for instance, "List of A&M Records artists" disambiguates between current and former) or redirects to categories. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Really has no topic. Does not meet WP:LISTPURP. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 00:19, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Comment On a totally random note, should not the article be a member of itself? It doesn't distinguish that it must be a list of lists of non-lists. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 00:21, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. It has a context and a topic at least as much as Category:Contents has a context and a topic. It has a useful purpose in guiding editors and researchers to lists of lists. Faulty entries on the page do not render the page useless; faulty entries can be fixed or removed, but the page in general is not faulty.—Wavelength (talk) 01:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. What is achieved by deleting this article, other than conformance to some arbitrary "standard"? There is plenty of handy information here, much of it not found collected elsewhere. The page is viewed nearly 10,000 times a month, which in itself is a keep reason, to my mind. It offends no one, and serves a useful purpose; leave it alone. --Seduisant (talk) 01:35, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- WP:ITSUSEFUL, WP:HARMLESS are not valid arguments. You lose, try again. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:ILIKEIT and WP:IGNORE. Pburka (talk) 03:13, 11 April 2012 (UTC)