User talk:220.245.207.26

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I was reviewing the changes you made recently, and thought you might benefit from familiarizing yourself with some Wikipedia policies and guidelines, particularly the policy on editing from a neutral point of view (see WP:NPOV). It appears that your edits are exclusively concerned with presenting negative reviews of an arts company, which may lead an observer to conclude that you are not making an attempt to contribute constructively or in a neutral manner. If you have any questions regarding this or other policies, I would be happy to help. Best regards, Homunculus (duihua) 17:06, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Seconded. Several tendentious edits just now removed. The Sound and the Fury (talk) 17:48, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Ethic Commission

Hello,

I see that you have attempted to add a paragraph about the Canadian ethics commission notice to Shen Yun Performing Arts again. Please know that you were not previously reverted simply because you are an IP address. Your edits were actually discussed and rejected on the article's talk page. As I noted in that discussion, a notice posted on the website of the Canadian ethics commissioner is not sufficiently notable, per WP:N and WP:DUE, the latter of which states "An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. For example, discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports about a subject may be verifiable and neutral, but still be disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic. This is a concern especially in relation to recent events that may be in the news."

Anyone who has worked in government (in the West, at least) would know that ethics commissions have general rules about accepting free gifts. This is nothing novel. Moreover, the original notice on the commissioner's website was removed and replaced with a more general advisory that makes no mention of Shen Yun.[1]

I will also repeat my previous concern about your editing activity. Wikipedia is based on principles of neutrality. Your editing history at this point suggests an almost single-minded concern with trying to insert negative information about Shen Yun Performing Arts. If you wish to contribute to Wikipedia, I recommend familiarizing yourself with WP:NPOV. Again, please don't hesitate to let me know if you have any questions.Homunculus (duihua) 15:37, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Stop deleting my stuff its highly sourced

Hi again. I will stress one final time that you should familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's content policies before persisting in your edits to Shen Yun Performing Arts. As stated above, simply because information is sourced does not mean that it is notable or afforded due weight. Other editors have reached a consensus on the deletion of the material you included, and you have attempted to add it four times now in spite of the fact that it constitutes undue weight. Moreover, while you have protested the deletion of your 'highly sourced' material, you have deleted other well sourced material, failing consistently to provide a sound explanation. Forgive my templated message below, but you deserve fair warning before I file a request for discretionary sanctions.Homunculus (duihua) 07:21, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Falun Gong. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Falun Gong#Final decision section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page.

You stop lieing there is no discussion and theres no concencus on your adition either.

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you are editing as an IP. Have you ever considered registering an account? You don't sacrifice your anonymity by so doing. You can potentially edit more articles (e.g. those that aren't semi-protected), build up a track record, and generally get taken more seriously (ie not get treated as a vandal). --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 04:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC)