Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Serbia: Difference between revisions
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
:::I am afraid I made mistake. The number of unassessed articles is higher. Besides almost 3,000 unassessed articles for their quality there are about 5,000 articles for their importance. This is huge job which requires joint effort of many editors. I again invite members of this project to start assessing unassessed articles.--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 10:11, 10 October 2012 (UTC) |
:::I am afraid I made mistake. The number of unassessed articles is higher. Besides almost 3,000 unassessed articles for their quality there are about 5,000 articles for their importance. This is huge job which requires joint effort of many editors. I again invite members of this project to start assessing unassessed articles.--[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 10:11, 10 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
::::I am assessing (mostly) each page i see unassessed. Didnt start any organised assessment process, but i suppose that would be priceless also... --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:WhiteWriter|WhiteWriter]]<sup>[[User talk:WhiteWriter |speaks]]</sup></span> 12:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC) |
::::I am assessing (mostly) each page i see unassessed. Didnt start any organised assessment process, but i suppose that would be priceless also... --<span style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em; class=texhtml">[[User:WhiteWriter|WhiteWriter]]<sup>[[User talk:WhiteWriter |speaks]]</sup></span> 12:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
:::::I was thinking about organizing some kind of... competition. But that could lead to wrong assessments. Or to create WPS assessment barnstars for assessment of 50, 100 and more than 300 articles per month? Or to invite fellow editors from WP Cro to help with this task like described [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATomobe03&diff=516309846&oldid=516212489 here]. WP Cro is much more active then WPS and many editors there know about the scope of this project very much. Any thoughts? --[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 13:29, 10 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== WP design == |
== WP design == |
Revision as of 13:29, 10 October 2012
This page may contain some text written in the Serbian language. |
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Serbia and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Serbia and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage WPT
Serbia Project‑class | |||||||
|
Welcome to WikiProject Serbia talk page!
Слободно остављајте поруке на енглеском као и на српском. Поруке на српском ће имати енглески превод испод текста, како би људи, који говоре само енглески, разумели све. Create New Topic |
Discussion at Talk:Axis occupation of Vojvodina#RfC:Is this article subject notable, and if so, is it an acceptable fork of existing articles?
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Axis occupation of Vojvodina#RfC:Is this article subject notable, and if so, is it an acceptable fork of existing articles?. Peacemaker67 (talk) 10:13, 12 August 2012 (UTC)Template:Z48
MatIja or MatEja Nenadović
Help needed to determine the best title for the article about Mati(e)ja Nenadović.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 16:12, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Unassessed articles
- There are about 3,000 unassessed articles in WikiProject Serbia.
- There is Wikipedia:WikiProject Serbia/Assessment with several articles waiting for the review for more than two years.
I invite members of this project to start assessing unassessed articles. If all active members would assess several articles per day, we would soon have this issue resolved.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:00, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- I kindly remind members of WikiProjectSerbia about unassessed articles. If every active editor assess several articles per day this issue will be soon resolved, i.e. number of unassessed articles reduced to more acceptable level.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:30, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- There is very useful tool which can be helpful with articles' assessment. It can be found at 'My preferences'/Gadgets/Appearance/Display an assessment of an article's quality as part of the page header for each article. (documentation). --Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:59, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- I am afraid I made mistake. The number of unassessed articles is higher. Besides almost 3,000 unassessed articles for their quality there are about 5,000 articles for their importance. This is huge job which requires joint effort of many editors. I again invite members of this project to start assessing unassessed articles.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:11, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- I am assessing (mostly) each page i see unassessed. Didnt start any organised assessment process, but i suppose that would be priceless also... --WhiteWriterspeaks 12:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- I was thinking about organizing some kind of... competition. But that could lead to wrong assessments. Or to create WPS assessment barnstars for assessment of 50, 100 and more than 300 articles per month? Or to invite fellow editors from WP Cro to help with this task like described here. WP Cro is much more active then WPS and many editors there know about the scope of this project very much. Any thoughts? --Antidiskriminator (talk) 13:29, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- I am assessing (mostly) each page i see unassessed. Didnt start any organised assessment process, but i suppose that would be priceless also... --WhiteWriterspeaks 12:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- I am afraid I made mistake. The number of unassessed articles is higher. Besides almost 3,000 unassessed articles for their quality there are about 5,000 articles for their importance. This is huge job which requires joint effort of many editors. I again invite members of this project to start assessing unassessed articles.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:11, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- There is very useful tool which can be helpful with articles' assessment. It can be found at 'My preferences'/Gadgets/Appearance/Display an assessment of an article's quality as part of the page header for each article. (documentation). --Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:59, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
WP design
I think we should go with a more cleaner design, such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Greece, which is much more convenient.--Zoupan 14:17, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, i agree, i had a lot of problems with the design, and i also wanted similar thing. I created new design for Wikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology, and wanted something similar here, but that is a lot of time. I will do it in a 2 weeks, will not be on wiki all the time in next weeks... --WhiteWriterspeaks 14:36, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Please see
I am informing you about one move request related to this project.
If you are interested, it would be nice to participate, we need uninvolved editors. All best! --WhiteWriterspeaks 19:44, 9 October 2012 (UTC)