Template:Did you know nominations/Neanderthals of Gibraltar: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Updated status |
BlueMoonset (talk | contribs) review requirements not quite complete |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] Solid sources (OUP and academic journals), obviously long enough and new enough, neutral, hook fact is cited in article, etc. Ready to go. [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 02:58, 29 April 2013 (UTC) |
:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] Solid sources (OUP and academic journals), obviously long enough and new enough, neutral, hook fact is cited in article, etc. Ready to go. [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 02:58, 29 April 2013 (UTC) |
||
*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Neither review has properly addressed the specific requirement for Gibraltar hooks stated above: "at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] or promotional concerns about the article under review". (No, Dr. Blofeld's comment is not sufficient.) Can one of them please do so to complete the necessary steps outlined? Many thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 00:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
||
Revision as of 00:08, 1 May 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Neanderthals of Gibraltar
- ... that the Neanderthals of Gibraltar (male pictured) were among the first to be discovered and may have been among the last surviving members of their species?
Created by Prioryman (talk). Self nominated at 12:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC).
- Notification to reviewers
- Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options, Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any conflict of interest or promotional concerns about the article under review. IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews. When you have completed a review, please update the respective table below to change the background color to green and note that the review has been completed.
| First review completed |
Article meets core policies and guidelines of the DYK criteria, long enough, neutral, cites sources with inline citations and appears to be free of copyright violations and plagiarism. Hook fact is accurate and cited with an inline citation in the article. Article should be ready for displaying on the main page, well done!
Oh, one complaint. This article on the Neanderthals of Gibraltar contains a hidden code which says "Come to Gibraltar, it's the bestest place on earth".♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 10:55, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yeah, shame it's in Neanderthalese, which nobody's been able to understand for 24,000 years. ;-) Prioryman (talk) 21:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
| Second review completed |
Neither review has properly addressed the specific requirement for Gibraltar hooks stated above: "at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any conflict of interest or promotional concerns about the article under review". (No, Dr. Blofeld's comment is not sufficient.) Can one of them please do so to complete the necessary steps outlined? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
