User talk:Grapesoda22

AfD nomination of Master Shake

An article that you have been involved in editing, Master Shake, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Master Shake (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Deor (talk) 00:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

A Barnstar for your great work

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For the enormous amount of contributions to Adult Swim articles and for the tireless work, I hereby award Grapesoda22 the Tireless Contributor Barnstar. Thank you very much for all your work, which is a truly impressive amount of quality additions. Thank you. - Hydroxonium (talk) 08:43, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for all your efforts. -      Hydroxonium (talk) 08:43, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

American Dad article

You removed the image from the character section into the infobox. Several users, myself included, put the family photo near the character so as it adds depiction of the characters where they are discussed. There is already a photo in the infobox of the show title. Plus, I feel it makes the separate photo of Jeff look random and misplaced. Also, you removed the boxes that the character information was contained in. I feel because the overall amount of information, the absence of the infoboxes makes the character description look harder to read, untidy, and sort of cluttered. Do you think we could come to a consensus to revert these changes. Let me know what you think. AmericanDad86 (talk) 17:22, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

The character boxes didn't seem very necessary to me and looked awkward in the article. As for the info box image I'm following the lead of The Simpsons using a main cast photo to make it easier to identify the series at first glance. As for the Jeff image I really don't think it should be there it seems like an over using of images, I'd rather leave the entire character section to be free of images. I'd personally like it a lot better to have a family group image including Jeff (especially after he returns home following the events of "Lost in Space") Grapesoda22 (talk) 19:49, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Well, I would agree with you about Jeff. I actually think that was a very sharp observation you made as well about how it be even that much more crucial after Jeff returns from the events from Lost In Space. Can we actually find another pic that includes Jeff for the photo and replace it?

I would have to disagree with you on your point about the infobox making things look awkward. The King of the Hill article uses a similar type of infobox as there's a larger degree of characterization. I feel when there's a larger degree of characterization, infoboxes make it look easier to read. Of course it could be the case that you and I are looking at the material differently because different computer monitor types. I have noticed that many different computer monitors display Wikipedia articles differently, and don't even get me started on mobile phones. I don't know. I just liked the infoboxes there. What do you think we should do?! Are we at an impasse?! AmericanDad86 (talk) 08:45, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

I meant the character info being displayed in separate boxes on the main article looked awkward. As for the cast picture its really only six characters. Same as the Family Guy and when Jeff returns even then it would only be seven, same as The Simpsons. So the numbers thing doesn't seem like a big issue. Grapesoda22 (talk) 17:59, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Oh, I see what you're talking about. Personally, I thought it made it kind of organized: two parents together, their two kids together, then their three housemates. That said, I can see how it could be perceived as unconventional and thus awkward as typically they're all put together. How about adding the info boxes back and without having them separated? Also, there are a few mistakes in your edit, like the removal of Klaus's name under his description. I haven't added it back just because I'm hoping that we can come to a consensus to reincorporate the info boxes only without the separations that you object to. AmericanDad86 (talk) 21:17, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Yeah just fix my typos, I'll get back to you soon. We can finish this for good. Grapesoda22 (talk) 21:45, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Haha! Ok, sounds good. Look forward to your return. =) AmericanDad86 (talk) 22:44, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

I've corrected the few errors. Also, let's keep the info boxes out as you suggested. I've gotten used to your version already. lol! AmericanDad86 (talk) 23:15, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm thinking now, you've done a lot of good for this article. Do whatever you see fit. I'll try not to get in the way. I would recommend not putting the character info in boxes, but if you want to go for it. Grapesoda22 (talk) 23:59, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

How kind of you to say that. =) I'm still going to take your recommendation and leave the character info boxes out though. I must say as well that you've done a marvelous job with touching up "grammar" and "tone" on this article and others, removing the contractions and making things flow. Excellent work with that. Thanks for those edits. AmericanDad86 (talk) 13:49, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Simpsons. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Blurred Lines 18:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of The Simpsons episodes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Blurred Lines 18:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at The Simpsons. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Blurred Lines 19:16, 23 November 2013 (UTC)