Jump to content

User talk:Gogo Dodo: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Joshuamiles99 (talk) to last version by Gogo Dodo
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 88: Line 88:


:[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tom220299&diff=585787713&oldid=585787184 I already told you why]. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo#top|talk]]) 19:31, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
:[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tom220299&diff=585787713&oldid=585787184 I already told you why]. -- [[User:Gogo Dodo|Gogo Dodo]] ([[User talk:Gogo Dodo#top|talk]]) 19:31, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

== Survivor related discussion ==

Hey there, being that you're a regular contributor to Survivor articles, I would love to get some input from you on the discussion I started at [[Talk:Survivor (U.S. TV series)#Cleaning up Survivor seasons articles]] -- thanks in advance, '''[[User:Gloss|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#000080">Gloss</span>]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User_talk:Gloss|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#007BA7">talk]]'''</span> 22:15, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
:Out of curiosity, did you look it over? I was really interested in your opinion as you know your way around the Survivor articles. '''[[User:Gloss|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#000080">Gloss</span>]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User_talk:Gloss|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:#007BA7">talk]]'''</span> 06:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:26, 16 December 2013

  Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here.
When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind:
  • Use a descriptive subject/headline.
  • If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to.
  • Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless...
  • If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section.

Click here to leave me a message

User talk:108.162.157.141

This user has already gone past WP:3RR at Survivor: Blood vs. Water despite me trying to intervene. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:37, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you taking sides? You don't even edit that article at all.108.162.157.141 (talk) 04:40, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Im not taking sides, rather than discussing the problem on the talkpage you are undoing edits. It is WP:DISRUPTIVE and you have been told by multiple editors now to stop. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:42, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You took the side of those that are against me.108.162.157.141 (talk) 04:46, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
On wikipedia there are no sides, there is discussion, rather than undoing edits discuss with other editors about what you want to have happen, sometimes it goes your way sometimes it doesnt. Anyways I am going to get some sleep now sorry to have dragged you into this Gogo. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:52, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Any editor is entitled to edit the article. An editor is not required to have past history with the article or any related article to make an edit. You have broken 3RR and the edit in question has been reverted by three different editors now. The burden is upon you to get a consensus for the change. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:45, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:45, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PRIOR says past precedent are not valid arguments and are not set in stone. And I didn't say that he cannot edit because he has never edited that article. I am asking why he is biased against me especially when he doesn't edit that article.108.162.157.141 (talk) 04:47, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:BRD. You put the change back in, you got reverted multiple times, the burden is upon you to get a new consensus, not to continue in an edit war. Disagreeing with somebody does not mean that they are biased against you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:51, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is absolutely not necessary to put the vote totals again when the contestant has an active row detailing the vote totals.108.162.157.141 (talk) 04:57, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That is your opinion and the implied consensus from you being reverted multiple times shows that majority want the total as listed. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:54, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I don't know if you noticed, but two users are trying to generate a consensus to ignore WP:NOTCENSORED and not post CBS' own preview spoilers. Given that you are an admin who edits Survivor pages, I want to ask you, is generating such a consensus even allowed? Can a set of users form a rule to ignore the rules? Thegreyanomaly (talk) 06:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

E. J. Singler - um, not my article, but that would not be a speedy

The last time I saw the article it mention he played professional basketball and had a few sources, which is enough to have kicked it to AfD. Please reconsider and undelete, then take it to AfD. Speedies for the cited reason are not intended for this type of article. Had the kid been a high school baller, sure, but when people play Division I basketball, they start getting beyond CSD and need to be taken to AfD. And just in case you bring it up, he does not fail WP:NHOOPS, as one cannot fail that criteria. All of the sports notability guidelines are in essence an alternative to the standard GNG, thus you cannot fail them, you just don't get the free pass. He may still not be notable, but I doubt you even checked for sources, which needs to happen before it then is taken to AfD. Aboutmovies (talk) 05:00, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For this (I would have just used Echo's thank-you notification, but I wanted to thank you for the action indicated, not the edit itself). I thought I had forgotten a step somewhere ... there were a whole bunch of new UAAs coming in and I wasn't totally able to focus on it at the time in any event. Daniel Case (talk) 13:34, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Brightify

Hi Gogo Dodo, as an FYI, (and I'm making a horrible assumption that you might not be aware), Brightify has been very active of late. Here's one of the sock reports. Looks like he's also FanforClarl, HoshiNoKaabi2000, WangsDaringsFun, and many more. I think FanforClarl is the older account. I believe one of the sock accounts took credit for being GMTV Chart Show, thought I don't think that was ever proven by CheckUser. If all this sounds like gibberish to you, please ignore the parts I'm not properly explaining.  :) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:31, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't gibberish. I followed you. =) I blocked the account for sockpuppetry after noticing your early reverts on that account. I'm not familiar with that particular sockpuppet, so I didn't recognize them. Thanks for being on the top of that one. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you very much for deleting an article so quickly! Marked it for speedy deletion. I pressed F5, and it was gone already. Granted, the deletion probably wasn't because I nominated it, but I was quite amazed. Thanks again! SpeedyAstro (talk) 04:40, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:47, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor edit war

Thank you for the notice; I reblocked the IP, this time for 60 hours. I'm a big believer in WP:ROPE, including the "hang" part for the recidivist. I'm almost always ready to unblock someone who sounds sincere, especially on something like this in which it's just one article, not a big policy question or project-wide issue, but it's my opinion that we shouldn't give any mulligans when someone returns to the problematic editing as soon as possible after the unblock. Nyttend (talk) 05:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:01, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

i dont understand

when you want to edit something it dosent have the edit sign?!? 😔😔😔😔 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudeyildiz (talkcontribs) 21:15, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In Reply against deletion of post

Dear Gogo, I am really surprised why you delete my post, and why you remove the link. That link was to know more about us, let me tell you about KHANZTUTO.

KHANZTUTO is an organization that provide free Technical and vocational trainings from the affected people of SWAT(the area situated in Pakistan where the WAR against terror destroyed minds of the youth, where MALLALA a little girl was shot by Taliban). We are struggling to change the mind of our YOUTH and what are you doing ? deleting and removing contents from our post. I think this is not a good response for our struggle, you should support and appreciate us.

Thanks,

Regards, Khan vice chairman of YOUTH LEAGUE swat, KP , Pakistan Director Engineering Arts Technology & Vocational Centre. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.181.155.149 (talk) 16:21, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your advertisement because, as noted in the message that I left you, Wikipedia is not here to advertise your services. Please see Wikipedia's organizations' FAQ regarding what you should and should not do regarding editing on behalf of your organization. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:38, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:WarthogDemon/TWA/Earth

So I was curious about what The Wikipedia Adventure was, but didn't realize it would create pages. Can this be deleted? :P Or will it delete if I go ahead and finish it? -WarthogDemon 00:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It would help if I gave you a link! User:WarthogDemon/TWA/Earth. -WarthogDemon 00:32, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Tom220299

Why did you delete Ouzelwell? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom220299 (talkcontribs) 19:27, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I already told you why. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:31, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, being that you're a regular contributor to Survivor articles, I would love to get some input from you on the discussion I started at Talk:Survivor (U.S. TV series)#Cleaning up Survivor seasons articles -- thanks in advance, Gloss • talk 22:15, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiosity, did you look it over? I was really interested in your opinion as you know your way around the Survivor articles. Gloss • talk 06:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]