Jump to content

User talk:ZORDANLIGHTER: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
no
m →‎Topic ban: ban is of an indefinite duration
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 46: Line 46:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Archtexlic#honesty[[User:ZORDANLIGHTER|ZORDANLIGHTER]] ([[User talk:ZORDANLIGHTER#top|talk]]) 18:23, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Archtexlic#honesty[[User:ZORDANLIGHTER|ZORDANLIGHTER]] ([[User talk:ZORDANLIGHTER#top|talk]]) 18:23, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
I am quitting WP. I will not come back again. ...even after two weeks I will not open any new account. But I will keep visiting WP and not clear any wrong information as i did in Total Siyapaa's page. administrators don't care for truth . for them WP rules and guidelines are more important than correct information. I had to go through so much trouble to edit Total Siyapa's page and now two stupid guys are linked to my account as sock puppets. I won't call whistlingwods stupid as he made positive contribution but his account is also blocked forever.but as i am blocked i would request all administrators to remove all my contributions in total siyapaa's talk page and let it remain the way languagexpert wanted. that is- '''total siyapaa received positive reviews from critics and good box office opening''' GOOD BYE.ALL OF YOU[[User:ZORDANLIGHTER|ZORDANLIGHTER]] ([[User talk:ZORDANLIGHTER#top|talk]]) 18:47, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
I am quitting WP. I will not come back again. ...even after two weeks I will not open any new account. But I will keep visiting WP and not clear any wrong information as i did in Total Siyapaa's page. administrators don't care for truth . for them WP rules and guidelines are more important than correct information. I had to go through so much trouble to edit Total Siyapa's page and now two stupid guys are linked to my account as sock puppets. I won't call whistlingwods stupid as he made positive contribution but his account is also blocked forever.but as i am blocked i would request all administrators to remove all my contributions in total siyapaa's talk page and let it remain the way languagexpert wanted. that is- '''total siyapaa received positive reviews from critics and good box office opening''' GOOD BYE.ALL OF YOU[[User:ZORDANLIGHTER|ZORDANLIGHTER]] ([[User talk:ZORDANLIGHTER#top|talk]]) 18:47, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

== Topic ban ==

{{Ivmbox
|2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg
|imagesize=50px
|1=The following sanction now applies to you:

{{Talkquote|1=Indefinitely [[WP:TBAN|Topic banned]] from topics related to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan}}

You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=602308995#ZORDANLIGHTER this arbitration enforcement request].

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved administrator]] under the authority of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]]'s decision at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision]] and, if applicable, the procedure described at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banning policy]] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Appeal|here]]. I recommend that you use the [[Template:Arbitration enforcement appeal#Usage|arbitration enforcement appeals template]] if you wish to submit an appeal to the enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard.&nbsp;Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- This message generated from Template:AE_sanction.--> [[User:Cailil|<font color="#808080" size="2">'''Cailil'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Cailil|<font color="#808080">'''talk'''</font>]]</sup> 19:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
}}--[[User:Cailil|<font color="#808080" size="2">'''Cailil'''</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Cailil|<font color="#808080">'''talk'''</font>]]</sup> 19:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:42, 1 April 2014

ZORDANLIGHTER, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The
Adventure
The Wikipedia Adventure guide

Hi ZORDANLIGHTER!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there!


This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
[reply]

Arbitration enforcement

I have filed an arbitration enforcement request against you, here Darkness Shines (talk) 20:29, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Tirangaa

Thank you! Leoesb1032 (talk) 20:29, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter if you are Indian or not. Saying that the movie was a huge success is an opinion. If you say something like "numerous sources have highly praised the film" or along those lines, that is a different story. Leoesb1032 (talk) 13:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZORDANLIGHTER (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What is going on?who are these guys blackie and imran.And this whistle can write in urdu and arabic and can also submit pictures.This blackie and imran. i want to know about them. can someone tell me what they did? i know whistle but these two? I hope whistle logs in someday and tells that he can write in arabic and urdu language — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZORDANLIGHTER (talkcontribs)

Decline reason:

You have been blocked for abusing multiple accounts, which was verified by Checkuser. The first step toward being unblocked is acknowledging the behavior that got you blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I personally don't hate whiswoods as he was always supporting my views on total Siyapaa talk page. But the other two. I don't like their names. I will check their contribution and see if i can find any similarities. i am not even sure whether whistle has any relation with other two. User:BLACKIEHINDUUser talk:BLACKIEHINDU AND IMRANABBASTHECHAMPIONUser talk:IMRANABBASTHECHAMPION .even though I don't like both of you at all. just tell me whether you visit SK's cybercafe.ZORDANLIGHTER (talk) 18:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At last i found the pages. whhen darknessshines told me that whistling woods didn't use any other script other than English in the sock page discussion; I decided to check his contribution page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Whistlingwoods

I saw that he wrote in other user talk pages and administrator talk pages. There his sign his visible till now.He can write in urdu/arabic. i dont understand what he wrote but i am copy pasting the links https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Huon#Fraud_played_by_ZORDANLIGHTER_to_win_his_proposed_edit_in_CRITICAL_RECEPTION_section_of_Total_Siyapaa

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Archtexlic#honestyZORDANLIGHTER (talk) 18:23, 30 March 2014 (UTC) I am quitting WP. I will not come back again. ...even after two weeks I will not open any new account. But I will keep visiting WP and not clear any wrong information as i did in Total Siyapaa's page. administrators don't care for truth . for them WP rules and guidelines are more important than correct information. I had to go through so much trouble to edit Total Siyapa's page and now two stupid guys are linked to my account as sock puppets. I won't call whistlingwods stupid as he made positive contribution but his account is also blocked forever.but as i am blocked i would request all administrators to remove all my contributions in total siyapaa's talk page and let it remain the way languagexpert wanted. that is- total siyapaa received positive reviews from critics and good box office opening GOOD BYE.ALL OF YOUZORDANLIGHTER (talk) 18:47, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban

The following sanction now applies to you:

Indefinitely Topic banned from topics related to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan

You have been sanctioned for the reasons provided in response to this arbitration enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Cailil talk 19:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--Cailil talk 19:39, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]