User talk:DangerousPanda

This user has opted out of talkbacks

Note: please do not use talkback {{tb}} templates here unless you are referring to discussion areas that I have not yet been a part of; I do monitor my conversations

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. the panda ₯’

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2014

Can you give us the brief statement about the results of the RFC? --George Ho (talk) 04:43, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Holy crap, that fell off my watchlist! the panda ₯’ 08:28, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Pakaran has one edit since April, and he's talked about some problems he's having, so I've offered to step in (if I can be helpful) over on his talk page. DP and JC ... any thoughts, any objections? - Dank (push to talk) 11:23, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Dank, the only "criteria" I was "tested" on was: "have you commented at the RFC? do you have strong feelings about PC?" the panda ɛˢˡ” 12:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

I dropped a suggestion on the talk page there, and welcome your thoughts. And of course, your thoughts are welcome on the various closure page threads as well : ) - jc37 01:46, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks !

The link to the essay WP:TTR made my day. I'm not sure I agree with it and getting my second template in six years from Demi kind of annoyed me, but I really appreciated your link and the essay. Thanks again! Capitalismojo (talk) 23:22, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

You two were getting a little heated for no real good reason. We all need a template in the ass every some often, just to remind us we're mere mortals after all :-) Glad the humour wasn't lost the panda ₯’ 23:28, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Editings

Main article: Copy editing

I see that some of editors like User:舎利弗 are trying to delete my articles , but i have many sources and reviews and readings on to any sources before i made an articles and cited it to my edits... so It was tried to deleted last year .. it was cleared that it was a i have some footnotes on to it on my articles also.. they saying that it was a non-reliable, but it it was also based on the references of the particular articles (which i derived it).. if you have an Solution,, please put it on my talk page.... Thank you! P.Andrew (talk) 04:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

All the nominations were on grounds of notability and verifiability. Provide independent, reliable sources that provide significant coverage and the nominations will be happily withdrawn. 舎利弗 (talk) 05:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

I advice the dear administrator, should he wish to leave a comment, to direct it to User talk:Sky Harbor#Editings, where we have proceeded with the discussion so far, so that he may be informed of the progress so far as to this case. 舎利弗 (talk) 20:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Quick Question

I see you have been on Wikipedia for some time, and I have one quick question.

How do you put a line through text that you type?

Try <s> before the text, and </s> after it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:36, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Stefan Molyneux edit warring

Hello DP. I wonder whether you could keep an eye on this article. The editor whom you recently blocked has resumed edit-warring by repeatedly reverting to restore his preferred versions of text. The article is at a standstill, despite talk page consensus against the views of that editor. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 03:45, 26 May 2014 (UTC)