Template:Did you know nominations/National Action (UK): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
cmt |
the ladies do protest too much |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Length and date ok. QPQ is needed (creator has 5 DYKs). The hook is not fully supported by ref (makes mention that a person identified as a spokesperson of the group made such a comment on skype, not that it would be a policy of the organization as such). Overall, the article is quotefarming from 3 news/blog entries, all of which are largely based on anonymous/semi-anonymous persons. This is [[WP:OR]], intrepretation of quotes given in a third source. For me, the article would need a rewrite into more encyclopediatic style. --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 08:40, 17 August 2014 (UTC) |
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Length and date ok. QPQ is needed (creator has 5 DYKs). The hook is not fully supported by ref (makes mention that a person identified as a spokesperson of the group made such a comment on skype, not that it would be a policy of the organization as such). Overall, the article is quotefarming from 3 news/blog entries, all of which are largely based on anonymous/semi-anonymous persons. This is [[WP:OR]], intrepretation of quotes given in a third source. For me, the article would need a rewrite into more encyclopediatic style. --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 08:40, 17 August 2014 (UTC) |
||
:::No doubt they're all poofs like [[Ernst Rohm]]. [[User:EEng|EEng]] ([[User talk:EEng|talk]]) 04:08, 18 August 2014 (UTC) |
|||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
||
Revision as of 04:08, 18 August 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
National Action (UK)
- ... that National Action want to reintroduce Section 28, which prohibited the teaching of homosexuality in British schools?
Created by The Almightey Drill (talk). Self nominated at 15:03, 9 August 2014 (UTC).
Length and date ok. QPQ is needed (creator has 5 DYKs). The hook is not fully supported by ref (makes mention that a person identified as a spokesperson of the group made such a comment on skype, not that it would be a policy of the organization as such). Overall, the article is quotefarming from 3 news/blog entries, all of which are largely based on anonymous/semi-anonymous persons. This is WP:OR, intrepretation of quotes given in a third source. For me, the article would need a rewrite into more encyclopediatic style. --Soman (talk) 08:40, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- No doubt they're all poofs like Ernst Rohm. EEng (talk) 04:08, 18 August 2014 (UTC)