Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam (band): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
+delete |
Hey assholes. If I show without a doubt that it is notable, will you step down as an administrator, and or stop editing for 1 month? ~~~~ |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Delete''' per nom. Along with the policies mentioned it does not meet [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]]|[[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 21:40, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per nom. Along with the policies mentioned it does not meet [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:MarnetteD|MarnetteD]]|[[User talk:MarnetteD|Talk]] 21:40, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
||
* '''delete'''. Lots of coverage but of the event, not the band, and mostly trivial, lightweight, click-baitish coverage as sites know a headline with some combination of 'orgasm', 'video', 'NSFW' will attract lots of clicks. No in depth coverage, little on the band itself. That's [[WP:GNG]]; apart from that no evidence they come close to any of the criteria in [[WP:NMUSIC]]. Non-notable whichever way you look at it.--<small>[[User:JohnBlackburne|JohnBlackburne]]</small><sup>[[User_talk:JohnBlackburne|words]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/JohnBlackburne|deeds]]</sub> 21:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
* '''delete'''. Lots of coverage but of the event, not the band, and mostly trivial, lightweight, click-baitish coverage as sites know a headline with some combination of 'orgasm', 'video', 'NSFW' will attract lots of clicks. No in depth coverage, little on the band itself. That's [[WP:GNG]]; apart from that no evidence they come close to any of the criteria in [[WP:NMUSIC]]. Non-notable whichever way you look at it.--<small>[[User:JohnBlackburne|JohnBlackburne]]</small><sup>[[User_talk:JohnBlackburne|words]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">[[Special:Contributions/JohnBlackburne|deeds]]</sub> 21:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC) |
||
* Hey assholes. If I show without a doubt that it is notable, will you step down as an administrator, and or stop editing for 1 month? [[User:750editsstrong|750editsstrong]] ([[User talk:750editsstrong|talk]]) 11:32, 10 January 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 11:32, 10 January 2015
- Adam (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not particularly sure how to check this, but others have expressed concern over whether this band meets WP:NBAND. The other claim to notability - their orgasm music video - is no more notable than other small-scale viral videos, most of which have been deleted per WP:NOTNEWS: the coverage is short and confined to the week or two after the video. See [1], [2], and [3], the last of which had much more widespread coverage because of Jameis Winston and is actually still being talked about. Lastly, though not too important, the article was created (perhaps intentionally poorly) to make a WP:POINT; the point was made and rebutted, and it's probably time for this to go. ansh666 20:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NBAND -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 20:51, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Fails WP:NBAND. --–Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 21:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Along with the policies mentioned it does not meet WP:GNG. MarnetteD|Talk 21:40, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- delete. Lots of coverage but of the event, not the band, and mostly trivial, lightweight, click-baitish coverage as sites know a headline with some combination of 'orgasm', 'video', 'NSFW' will attract lots of clicks. No in depth coverage, little on the band itself. That's WP:GNG; apart from that no evidence they come close to any of the criteria in WP:NMUSIC. Non-notable whichever way you look at it.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 21:49, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hey assholes. If I show without a doubt that it is notable, will you step down as an administrator, and or stop editing for 1 month? 750editsstrong (talk) 11:32, 10 January 2015 (UTC)