Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 February 19: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:22, 28 February 2015

< February 18	February 20 >

February 19

File:File Logo of LEIA Inc.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by LEIA Inc LOGO.png Pauline cristofari (talk) 01:24, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Radon.jpg

Theoretically replaceable (NFCC#1 doesn't require it to be easy; it just requires it to be possible ["Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose."]; we've deleted non-free images of political prisoners who've spent dozens of years in prison in the middle of a jungle). I previously DI'd this, but was reverted. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:13, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The notion expressed in the FU rationale that it would be illegal to create a replacement strikes me as a strong one. Samsara 20:19, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is it illegal to create a replacement in every country in the world? If it is legal to create a replacement image in at least one country, then that rationale is invalid. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not if that country doesn't have the facilities needed for radon purification. Samsara 20:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Facilities can be constructed. Anyway, whether creating a replacement is legal or not seems to be irrelevant. For example, Wikipedia does not accept non-free photographs of modern French buildings. Instead, Wikipedia requires someone to, in violation of French law, take a photograph of the building and upload it to Wikipedia. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:28, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar with the case you allude to, but there are clearly circumstances in which the WMF could be forced to remove an image even though there are no copyright problems, and the reason for removal could very well be related to the reason why taking the picture was illegal in the first place. Samsara 07:13, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the file is kept, it will have to be removed from Template:Infobox radon per NFCC#9. Stifle (talk) 15:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Didn't see why that should wait. Samsara 06:42, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've made it so that it doesn't appear on the template page, but will appear when transcluded in the article. [[User:Double sharp|Do mage from entities producing the element (Po in that case), and all failed. Double sharp (talk) 08:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Previous NFC review of this file itself from latish 2013: Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 35#File:Radon.jpg. Has anything changed about the availability of this material or the feasibility/likelihood of someone having/making a free replacement picture? Are there any new arguments being made here now? DMacks (talk) 08:45, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This one seems fairly simple to me as an NFCC#1 failure, and not because it is possible for someone to recreate this image. This is not an image of radon but an image of Radioluminescence caused by radon. The Polonium example is different as that substance can be seen and shown, radon can't. We can't display colourless gasses and already use free images for radio luminescence. Oxygen lacks an image of it in its gaseous state, as like Radon you can't see it, and the radio luminescence can be shown with a free image of the effect. - Peripitus (Talk) 10:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahmadu Bello2.jpg

Copyright violation: Unlikely to be own work – as similar files have been uploaded to Commons, "personal archives" rather seems to stand for "I got a print of that photo" than "I took the photo", if anything. FDMS 4 15:21, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikiproject sharks logo.png

Better quality SVG exists on commons at c:File:Wikiproject sharks logo.svg Arthunter (talk) 15:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:WikiProject Hawaii.png

Better quality SVG version exists on commons at c:File:WikiProject Hawaii.svg Arthunter (talk) 15:35, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Reh man 07:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete c:File:WikiProject Hawaii.svg supercedes this file. Begoon ^talk 14:55, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:The graph y = √x.png

Unused media file. Also, superseded by an alternative vector version. Rubber Duck (☮ • ✍) 16:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:White illusion.png

Better quality SVG version exists on commons at c:File:White illusion.svg Arthunter (talk) 18:26, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Reh man 07:11, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Verisign-dotnet-logo-white.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Better quality PNG version exists on commons at c:File:Verisign-dotnet-logo-white.png Arthunter (talk) 18:42, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily delete, per nom. Reh man 07:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Translink-busscheds.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 - image does not convey any information to the reader that can't be provided by text. The fair use rationale is boilerplate and useless. Kelly ^hi! 18:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Heather Podesta 2013.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid fair use rationale. We have several photos of Podesta available here. APK whisper in my ear 20:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We can't keep a non-free file of this person per WP:NFCC#1. If the uploader is the copyright holder they should send permission to WP:OTRS. Kelly ^hi! 23:07, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Altay MBT Mock-up.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR: "No Other photo of the tank is currently available." eh bien mon prince (talk) 21:03, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mightyrubberduck.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative of copyrighted logo. Kelly ^hi! 21:31, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Reh man 07:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 *If the file is kept, it will have to be removed from [[Template:Infobox radon]] per NFCC#9. [[User:Stifle|Stifle]] ([[User talk:Stifle|talk]]) 15:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 **[[File:Yes check.svg|18px|link=]] '''Done'''<!--template:done--> Didn't see why that should wait. [[User:Samsara|Samsara]] 06:42, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
-***I've made it so that it doesn't appear on the template page, but will appear when transcluded in the article. [[User:Double sharp|Double sharp]] ([[User talk:Double sharp|talk]]) 08:37, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
+***I've made it so that it doesn't appear on the template page, but will appear when transcluded in the article. [[User:Double sharp|Do mage from entities producing the element (Po in that case), and all failed. [[User:Double sharp|Double sharp]] ([[User talk:Double sharp|talk]]) 08:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
-* A precedent: [[Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 30#File:Polonium.jpg]], where multiple attempts were made to obtain a free image from entities producing the element (Po in that case), and all failed. [[User:Double sharp|Double sharp]] ([[User talk:Double sharp|talk]]) 08:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 *Previous NFC review of this file itself from latish 2013: [[Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 35#File:Radon.jpg]]. Has anything changed about the availability of this material or the feasibility/likelihood of someone having/making a free replacement picture? Are there any new arguments being made here now? [[User:DMacks|DMacks]] ([[User talk:DMacks|talk]]) 08:45, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
+*'''Delete'''. This one seems fairly simple to me as an NFCC#1 failure, and not because it is possible for someone to recreate this image. This is not an image of radon but an image of [[Radioluminescence]] caused by radon. The Polonium example is different as that substance can be seen and shown, radon can't. We can't display colourless gasses and already use free images for radio luminescence. [[Oxygen]] lacks an image of it in its gaseous state, as like Radon you can't see it, and the radio luminescence can be shown with a free image of the effect. - [[User:Peripitus |Peripitus]] [[User talk:Peripitus|(Talk)]] 10:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 ====[[:File:Ahmadu Bello2.jpg]]====