User talk:Anosola

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Anosola, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Lionratz (talk) 13:10, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Momoiro Clover Z has been reverted.
Your edit here to Momoiro Clover Z was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/user/stardustdigital/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:29, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MCZ Battle and Romance cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MCZ Battle and Romance cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:11, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:MCZ Battle and Romance cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MCZ Battle and Romance cover.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 12:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Momoiro Clover Z

This doesn't look like "organizing" the article. (I can't find the edit when you removed it but anyway a third of the article text is missing.) You really need to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia a little bit before deleting content. --Moscowconnection (talk) 11:24, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Read also this: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Music and this: Wikipedia:Notability and this: Wikipedia:特筆性. And this: Wikipedia:Three-revert rule, just in case... :) --Moscowconnection (talk) 20:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

I admit that it was improper to change the article by a large margin. I refrain voluntarily from editing the passages in English Wikipedia for a while. I try to be familiar with the rules and so on. Thanks for your advice. --Anosola (talk) 03:43, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Momoiro Clover Z images

Hi! Why did you delete the images that Puramyun31 added to Momoclo pages? They are uploaded to Wikipedia Commons and seem properly licensed to me. --Moscow Connection (talk) 12:04, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Though I mentioned the reason when I edited Japanese pages, I'm sorry for not having done that here. In short, let's discuss which pictures to use on each page. I'd like Japanese editers to join the discussion, so could you move to ノート:ももいろクローバーZ(Japanese)?--Anosola (talk) 12:16, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Puramyun31 doesn't seem to be Japanese, so probably won't be able to discuss it. I understand your caution when adding images in the Japanese Wikipedia, but this is the English Wikipedia. Here in the English Wikipedia, let's just add them back. --Moscow Connection (talk) 12:39, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Okey, I got it. I didn't know that he's a foregner.--Anosola (talk) 12:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

So you don't mind me putting the images back? I will add them back (here in the English Wikipedia) then. --Moscow Connection (talk) 12:57, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Sure. --Anosola (talk) 13:01, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

By the way, I'm going to improve the hooks soon.--Anosola (talk) 12:43, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Please don't change them yourself. (I agree with you removing the word "partly", though.) Let's discuss them in the Japanese Wikipedia. One hook has been approved already: Template:Did you know nominations/Ikuze! Kaitō Shōjo, so we should not touch it now. It is good to go, it will appear on the main page (for one day, the DYK section is renewed every day). --Moscow Connection (talk) 12:57, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

So sorry, I've just noticed your message...--Anosola (talk) 13:01, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

No problem. By the way, I'm afraid we can't write "parodies the style" cause the source doesn't say "parodies". The fact must be sourced. If you find a reliable source that says it's a parody, then we can say "parodies". The other changes are okay, thank you very much for correcting! --Moscow Connection (talk) 13:05, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

I like the way you put it, by the way ("parodies the style"). I'm hesitant to change it back... Could you find a source that says they parody the sentai genre. That would probably be enough. --Moscow Connection (talk) 13:09, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

I won't change "parodies the style" back. It is much better like this, thank you very much! But still, we should find a source. It may be obvious it is a parody (and now I think that I was mistaken when I said the fact must de directly sourced), but still it's better be on the safe side and find a source... --Moscow Connection (talk) 13:20, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

I've been looking for it, but it was difficult.--Anosola (talk) 13:58, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Do you have any other corrections to the hooks? Now I think I shouldn't have stopped you, but I was afraid you didn't understand the rules or could change the hook that had been already approved. --Moscow Connection (talk) 13:34, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Don't worry. I understand what you mean. Here's another suggestion.

Did you know that Akari Hayami, the former member of Momoiro Clover, struggled with being known as an idol because she had been dreaming to be an actress as a matter of fact? --Anosola (talk) 13:58, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

I'm afraid no one outside Japan knows what's an idol. I think the current hook is better. By the way, I'm not sure if an editor is allowed to change a hook that has already been reviewed or to edit someone else's nomination, so I asked a question about the DYK rules here. (I think it's allowed, though.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:09, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

OK. I got it. Now I am going to write about the photo choice on ノート:ももいろクローバーZ(Japanese). --Anosola (talk) 14:14, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

OK. By the way, in the Akari Hayami hook, do you think it would be better if we changed it from "left the girl group" to "left the group"? It would sound better. But I added the word "girl" because I thought that "girl group" sounds intriguing. --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:26, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Or even to "Akari Hayami left". It may be even better cause people will click on Momoiro Clover to see what it is. I think I will change it to "Akari Hayami left". --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:28, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

That's fine.--Anosola (talk) 14:32, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Look at this DYK nomination for inspiration! I saw it and understood that the fact that almost no one here knows what's "a momoiro clover" doesn't mean we should explain. Let them click and find out for themselves! --Moscow Connection (talk) 14:42, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

I understand we don't have to explain so much!

By the way, Look at this picture.[1] If we use this picture for Kanako's page, are you able to crop Shiori and even Momoka?

Shiori yes, Momoka no. (I can't draw a natural-looking background myself.) Do you want me to do it? (But not now, in a day or two.) I actually think the current image is better. --Moscow Connection (talk) 15:03, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Let's discuss later on ノート:ももいろクローバーZ(Japanese). When this picture is chosen, I'll ask you to do it if you don't mind.--Anosola (talk) 15:08, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I will do it. I can also crop the currently used photo. --Moscow Connection (talk) 15:12, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

August 2013

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Tarento. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 12:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

I've read through the manual and now understand it. Thank you for informing me. --Anosola (talk) 12:36, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Photo of Momoiro Clover Z

Hi! Please look at the discussion here: User talk:Da Vynci#Momoiro Clover Z. It's about the photo you added. I think you did a good job and it didn't spoil any articles. By the way, Da Vynchi is right saying that Wikipedia articles shouldn't use words like "current". The description should have said "As of 2013, ..." or something like that. --Moscow Connection (talk) 20:28, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

I understand. I'll use appropriate terms. Thanks for informing me. --Anosola (talk) 10:42, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Comedy music. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 14:22, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

I've understood what you mean. I'm sorry to have bothered you again. --Anosola (talk) 10:58, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Discography section

If there's a separate article for the band's discography, there is no need to have an extensive discography section on the band's main page. All that needs to be there are the studio albums. Do not restore the content, again.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 15:41, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

OK, I got it. --Anosola (talk) 15:50, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Momoiro Clover Z, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. DAJF (talk) 01:23, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry for bothering you. I've read through the manual and now understand it.--Anosola (talk) 13:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Genres

Please stop adding a billion genres to the infobox. And if you are going to provide references like that, add them such that anyone can easily verify your claims. Because 3 year old magazines that are out of print are not suitable references. Also, we don't need seven different types of "pop", particularly when all those variations have been subsumed by "J-Pop". Limit the list to the 3 or 4 most pertinent.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 09:24, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Ryulong. (いきなりPlease stop...は失礼ですよ)　I think it is a matter of opinion. I could not find the rule to limit the list to the 3 or 4. If you like to do so, why don't you start the discussion on the project page? That's because it influences many articles.--Anosola (talk) 09:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

I agree with Anosola. The genres that are sourced should stay. J-pop is a very broad genre. "J-pop" doesn't mean anything, except that it's not enka/kayokyoku or classical music. --Moscow Connection (talk) 09:49, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Why are you talking to me in Japanese? And I'm starting a discussion with you here because you are the one editing this crap in. We do not need fifty different variations of "pop" when being broad enough with J-pop is perfectly fine.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 10:35, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

I kindly ask you to use appropriate words here. I'd like to talk with you in a courteous attitude. I thought I would send this brief note to let you know that. Sorry, I will reply to you later.--Anosola (talk) 11:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

英語日本語翻訳校正のお願い

こんにちは、Anosolaさん

忙しいですか？Angkor Watの和訳をご完成いたしましたけど、一つのお願いがあります。多分今ご覧になっているように、私は日本語が母国語ではなく、和訳された記事を校正していただきたいと思います。あまり迷惑が懸からないことを祈ります。

先週、すでにウィキペディア日本語版のユーザーにご連絡いたしましたけど、そのうち二人は丁重に断り、その他はまだ返信していません。

原文はウィキペディア英語版の秀逸な記事ですが、訂正をたくさんいたしました。2005年に秀逸な記事として指定されましたから、時代遅れな情報がありますし、引用方式も雑然としていますし。とにかく、各陳述を自分でご検証いたして、この日本語版はもっと上質だと思います。今は文章の質は唯一の問題です。校正後、実際のアンコール・ワットの記事に移転いして秀逸な記事の選考に推薦するつもりでございます。

既存の日本語版アンコール・ワットに接合するのを私に任せてください。もちろん、以前に他のユーザーと合意を形成してみますが、ja:アンコール・ワット、ja:プロジェクト:建築、ja:プロジェクト:仏教の三つは全部が休止中ですから、論争を招くと思いません。

もし校正する気があるなら、ご連絡ください。

ご読了ありがとうございました。舎利弗 (talk) 20:02, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

お返事が遅くなり申し訳ございません。あまり時間が取れないため、少ない範囲での校正でしたら承ります。--Anosola (talk) 11:45, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Japanese box office

Hi there. Since you're Japanese, you may be able to help me with something. I've found two sources for Japanese box office: [2] and [3]. Their numbers seem to match from 2000 onwards, but for films form 1999 and before they don't. For example, eiren.org has Pokémon: The Movie 2000 with 3.5 billion yen but kogyotsushin.com has it will 6.4 billion. Do the sites say something to explain this? Maybe the second source has the numbers adjusted for inflation? I want to add the box office to the articles, but I'm not sure which one I should add... --Cattus ^talk 14:32, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Cattus. I appreciate your edit on Maku ga Agaru. As for kogyotsushin.com, there is a sign (当社調べ), which means an original research by the company. While, eiren.org is an incorporated association and seems to be reliable in my opinion. --Anosola (talk) 15:33, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks.--Cattus ^talk 21:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Replace removed categories

You removed categories that I placed on Nogizaka46. Please note that you edit was incorrect and left the category with no categorisations at all. Categories should be categorised. If two categories share the same categorisation, then fine they will both appear in the owning categories - nothing wrong in that. I have replaced the categories but will not edit these again in future. 81.159.156.59 (talk) 16:27, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I'm afraid I have a different opinion. It seems to be better to hear other editors' advice. --Anosola (talk) 04:14, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Do not edit my talk page and about your fan edits

Don't try to edit my talk page anymore, and your fan POV edits and intention about Momoiro Clover Z are obvious as you added that information on Music of Japan article, [4], on 5 September 2013. It is against WP:NPOV, as already stated, and although at the J-Pop article are mentioned the "Momoiro Clover Z surveys popularity", you can not accept that in reality are not popular and significant as you wish for. Sorry, it will not go.--Crovata (talk) 14:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

議論が終了していないにも関わらず、一方的に編集をしてしまうことは問題があると考えております。また、以下の内容にしっかりとお答えください。

I agree with the general fact that record sales are the only relevant and objective representation of popularity. But it is not the case in Japan because there exists 「特典商法」 (cf., http://www.cyzo.com/2014/12/post_19994.html). According to Oricon, over the half of Japanese people are against this kind of gimmick. (cf., http://www.oricon.co.jp/special/1467/) --Anosola (talk) 17:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

The annual number of audience represents popularity. (cf., http://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXMZO79804640X11C14A1000000/)　--Anosola (talk) 18:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

No, you do NOT agree and you are unwilling to understand how Wikipedia work! As First, don't you dare reverting my talk page for the fourth time as with third you already violated the Wikipedia principle (three-revert-rule). Second, understand how Wikipedia works! Third, understand and accept how that survey is a NOT an evidence for your ridiclious argument or proof for your non-constructive fan edit which is against NPOV. You clearly do not understand and as such should stop abusing Wikipedia as a promotinal page for that music group! Fourth, stop acting as an ignorant about Wikipedia principles and ignoring my warnings.--Crovata (talk) 18:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

I'd appreciate if you could express your opinion about 「特典商法」.--Anosola (talk) 18:19, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

The discussion on my talk page finished and I am not willing to continue it because, simply, there is no point. You simply ignore and do no understand and that's it. I previously commented at the User talk:Moscow Connection#J-pop, and ask Moscow Connection where You are wrong!

And do you know what 「特典商法」 is? Nothing, it is nothing. It is a non existing proof from foreign Japanese language which other editors do not understand and as such you are intentionally using against Wikipedia principles. You must read WP:NPOV article and learn about Neutrality on Wikipedia.--Crovata (talk) 18:28, 1 April 2015 (UTC)