Wikipedia:Featured article review/Jay Chou/archive1: Difference between revisions
DragonZero (talk | contribs) |
closing as removed |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
*'''Delist''', no one working on improving deficiences. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 14:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Delist''', no one working on improving deficiences. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 14:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delist''' [[User:DragonZero|<font color="#0080FF">DragonZero</font>]] ([[User talk:DragonZero#top|<small>Talk</small>]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/DragonZero|<small>Contribs</small>]]) 04:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC) |
*'''Delist''' [[User:DragonZero|<font color="#0080FF">DragonZero</font>]] ([[User talk:DragonZero#top|<small>Talk</small>]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/DragonZero|<small>Contribs</small>]]) 04:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC) |
||
{{FARClosed|delisted}} [[User:Maralia|Maralia]] ([[User talk:Maralia|talk]]) 14:02, 28 April 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:02, 28 April 2015
Jay Chou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: SeleneFN, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Taiwan, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rock music, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pop music
Review section
I am nominating this featured article for review because I feel like it no longer meets FA criteria. There are whole sections and paragraphs that are completely unsourced, and random sentences that aren't sourced. And the sources that are there do not seem reliable to me. Not something I would consider a FA. LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Delist. I'm utterly confused as to why until now it wasn't nominated to be delisted. I support your nomination to delist this article, it would need months of work at least to bring it back to FA standard. I can only think of looking in google books to find any of this unsourced information, but that's about it. Burklemore1 (talk) 07:38, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- Burklemore1, please review the instructions at WP:FAR. The article is nominated for review; Keep or Delist are declared when/if it moves to the FARC section. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:36, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- SandyGeorgia: Oops, I misread. Thanks for the letting me know. :-) Burklemore1 (talk) 13:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delist article. Clean-up banners automatically qualify for delisting. Besides, some of the references are not reliable. CookieMonster755 (talk) 20:35, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- CookieMonster755, please read the FAR instructions and the comments on this page just above yours. Your declaration won't be considered at this stage. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Move to FARC. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
FARC section
- Concerns raised in the review section largely centred on referencing. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delist. Currently in multiple clean up categories: articles lacking reliable references, articles needing additional references, articles with dead external links from September 2010, articles with unsourced statements from January and April 2015, and BLP articles lacking sources. DrKiernan (talk) 08:24, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delist, no one working on improving deficiences. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delist DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Maralia (talk) 14:02, 28 April 2015 (UTC)