Jump to content

User talk:Tiptoety: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tiptoety (talk | contribs)
Line 84: Line 84:
Hi, Tiptoety. I got an edit conflict with you when I went to clean up [[User talk:Phil Copperman]], probably because I took a few seconds to remove tpa first. Anyway, isn't that David Beals? Is Evlekis the same thing? I see you mention them in the same breath above. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 20:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC).
Hi, Tiptoety. I got an edit conflict with you when I went to clean up [[User talk:Phil Copperman]], probably because I took a few seconds to remove tpa first. Anyway, isn't that David Beals? Is Evlekis the same thing? I see you mention them in the same breath above. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|talk]] 20:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC).
:Hello Bishonen. Yes, you are correct, that is David. He and Evlekis are not the same, but have very similar technical data so distinguishing between the two can sometimes be challenging. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 20:44, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
:Hello Bishonen. Yes, you are correct, that is David. He and Evlekis are not the same, but have very similar technical data so distinguishing between the two can sometimes be challenging. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 20:44, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
::I think they are the very same. Admission of identity on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hash_Tag_444&diff=663452011&oldid=663450251 this edit] (so no major attempt to conceal), and listed is '''Bucksham Corporatvie''' with is blocked with name of [[User:Evlekis]] (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hash_Tag_444&diff=663452011&oldid=663450251). Technical data being similar must surely mean they are the same. --[[User:Mario Payne|Mario Payne]] ([[User talk:Mario Payne|talk]]) 21:18, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:18, 21 May 2015

8:39 pm, 15 November 2024 (PDT)
Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37

Another stalker WP:SOCK --- User:Shuriken892

See Shuriken892 (talk · contribs). Really, because of this and this recent matter (I mean my interactions at that talk page), Shuriken892 could be Cali11298 or RJR3333; as you know, RJR3333 has shown up to similarly revert me. And given the way PaulBustion88 (RJR3333's other account) has been acting lately (including sending me two harassing emails), it is likely best to check that account and his FDR account for WP:Sleepers. On a side note: Editors instantly reverted the Shuriken892 account. And, as you might know, I sent you an email earlier. Flyer22 (talk) 00:13, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And on another side note: While I have had various stalkers, and various disruptive ones, the only other stalker as bad as the two above is this one. And I doubt that she's over me, given what she's stated on her user talk page about me and that she was desperate for me to read her emails. Flyer22 (talk) 00:24, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Materialscientist, thanks for this. Did you look for any WP:Sleepers? He usually has them. Flyer22 (talk) 01:19, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like this has been resolved. Thanks Materialscientist. Best, Tiptoety talk 02:11, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I guess there were no sleepers this time? I find that hard to believe. But even if there were, it's not like the socking would have stopped if they were tagged and blocked. Flyer22 (talk) 02:16, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SkiverDiver (talk · contribs) is another one; see here and here. And here and here. I'm reporting him to you before he shows back up and starts reverting me because he hasn't been blocked yet. Maybe semi-protect the Lincoln Chafee article? It is one of his favorite articles. Flyer22 (talk) 01:08, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Account blocked and article protected. Best, Tiptoety talk 02:29, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

78.90.232.207

Yes, the warnings are stale but, They are all for unsourced genre changes without consensus, with the most recent edit today, what, you think I just stumbled across the warnings and decided to make a report ? Mlpearc (open channel) 21:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mlpearc. I don't really see this as a matter for AIV for starters, it is likely slow moving disruptive editing. With the IP being shared/dynamic I am not comfortable blocking based on only 1 edit today. Tiptoety talk 21:06, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Acroterion‎

I think a semi-protection of his talk page is in order. I have seen probably 40+ RevDels or outright Oversights on his talk page. I know admins typically don't like their talk pages protected (easier for whack-a-mole), but enough is enough. - NeutralhomerTalk21:31, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yep,  Done. Thanks, Tiptoety talk 21:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, thank you. - NeutralhomerTalk01:01, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RJR3333 or Cali11298

Doolittle8910 (talk · contribs) is either RJR3333 or Cali11298 pretending to be RJR3333. And if it is RJR3333, then this is the latest example of why the WP:Standard offer no longer applies to him. Flyer22 (talk) 03:26, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jjwikiwikijj (talk · contribs) is also worth checking. Flyer22 (talk) 03:30, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And just in case the edit summary that gives him (Doolittle8910) away is scraped from the edit history (via WP:Revision deletion or WP:Oversight), I am documenting it here: "Undid unhelpful edit done by the kike (Flyer22)." Flyer22 (talk) 03:42, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Doolittle8910 (talk · contribs) is  Confirmed as being Cali11298. As for Jjwikiwikijj (talk · contribs), I am declining to run a check at this time as their is insufficient behavioral evidence to justify one. Tiptoety talk 03:45, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[ WP:Edit conflict ]: I see that you indefinitely blocked Doolittle8910 as Cali11298. So he was impersonating RJR3333? If so, once again he has tried my intelligence and failed. Yes, Cali11298, I don't fall for things as easily as many others. Flyer22 (talk) 03:48, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Page deleted while I was blocked

Hi, Derick Spears' page was deleted while I was blocked, since the block has been reverted what would be the correct procedure to get this page restored? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cada mori (talkcontribs) 00:30, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to file a deletion review. Was that an article you were paid to create/edit? Tiptoety talk 02:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, however, his notability has been established. Cada mori (talk) 13:50, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confused

Hi. I see you blocked User:Ye Olde Editor With Wings at 23:42, 21 April 2015. One of their disruptive edits, here, was today recreated then aggressively defended here. That editor is now being discussed here. Having been myself told off for "bad" behaviour I don't really want much more to do with this but I wondered if it looked possible to you that it is the same editor. If not, please don't worry and sorry for bothering you. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 12:49, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Yes, this is a  Confirmed sock of either Evlekis (talk · contribs) or David Beals (talk · contribs). Either way, the account is now blocked. Best, Tiptoety talk 20:16, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More confusing socks

Hi, Tiptoety. I got an edit conflict with you when I went to clean up User talk:Phil Copperman, probably because I took a few seconds to remove tpa first. Anyway, isn't that David Beals? Is Evlekis the same thing? I see you mention them in the same breath above. Bishonen | talk 20:41, 21 May 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Hello Bishonen. Yes, you are correct, that is David. He and Evlekis are not the same, but have very similar technical data so distinguishing between the two can sometimes be challenging. Tiptoety talk 20:44, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think they are the very same. Admission of identity on this edit (so no major attempt to conceal), and listed is Bucksham Corporatvie with is blocked with name of User:Evlekis (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hash_Tag_444&diff=663452011&oldid=663450251). Technical data being similar must surely mean they are the same. --Mario Payne (talk) 21:18, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]