User talk:VanEman

		The Barnstar of David
		For taking the POV out of Women of the Wall, I award you this barnstar. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:22, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cardinal Newman Society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elizabeth Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Paedofilia

Hi VanEman I've seen that you talked with Debresser about Chabad sex-abuse, who claim that sex-abuse is not somehow built into the Chabad-movement. I beg to differ, because according to the Halacha sex with a boy who is less than 9 years of age is not sex with a man and is therefore permitted. Proof: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyTd9nknBz8& More proof: http://www.come-and-hear.com/sanhedrin/sanhedrin_54.html Amalek 0123456789 (talk) 19:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Even if this were true, which it is not, it would still be a matter of Halakha, which is the same for all so it is not an exclusive issue of Chabad. Debresser (talk) 08:54, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring - warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Relations between Catholicism and Judaism. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Here come the Suns (talk) 17:51, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Your recent editing history at Western Wall shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. William Thweatt ^TalkContribs 21:53, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Swarm ♠ 01:44, 8 August 2015 (UTC)