Talk:Bus transport in Cardiff

Cleanup

My cleanup may seem a bit brutal, but its for the benefit of the article! I have done the following:

• Switched the list of bus stops into a tabular format, for ease of reading
• Set all the images to the default image size, there isn't really any need for different sized images here.
• Moved the route lists into List of bus routes in Cardiff (more on this on that articles talk page)
• Condensed the Cardiff Bus section, ideally this should only be a summary, with the bulk of the detail going into the Cardiff Bus article.

What still needs to be done:

• Expand the remaining operators, to give a summary of their role in Cardiff, preferably long enough to avoid any white space caused by the images! (I have used {{clear}} template to space things out for now)
• Possibly a copyedit of the text for clarity, my prose isn't amazing, so I haven't touched any of that!

Maybe we could attempt to get this article to the good article standard? Jenuk1985 | Talk 01:32, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Image of bus stop and information board

I have just taken an image File:Cardiff bus stop, Ty Glas Road.jpg, which maybe of use in this article, but cannot see where to put it without the article getting too cluttered. Seth Whales (talk) 09:41, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

I think it's a good idea to have it there. Perhaps replace one of the pictures of Central Stn? Welshleprechaun (talk) 09:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Recent edits

Hi,

I have assumed good faith in the recent two reverts. When there are too many (useful) images, it is always best to put them into a Gallary of images, which is what I have done. Please do not revert for a third time...Discuss. SethWhales ^talk 22:23, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

There's no need for a gallery here, If the article contained too many images then I'd agree but as it stands there's not enough to justify a gallery, Also there doesn't need to be an image for every section of the article or bus operator either –Davey2010^Talk 22:28, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly....SethWhales ^talk 22:35, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

• We have WP:BRD for a reason - You were Bold in changing the layout, You were Reverted and now we need to Discuss it which we now have, If anyone's edit warring here it's you my friend!. –Davey2010^Talk 22:38, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

• • Sorry, but an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Which is unfortunately what you have done...I have reverted once. SethWhales ^talk 22:42, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
    • Doesn't count as the edits were different - It wasn't the same edit being reverted back & fourth, To be fair I did add the NAT bus back so I did in some respects self revert anyway, Anyway there isn't a problem with the current layout - All images are evenly spaced and not too squashed so I don't see a problem. –Davey2010^Talk 22:46, 4 October 2015 (UTC)