Jump to content

User talk:NJA: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Zangouang (talk | contribs)
Requesting rollback: reply with rationale on action
Line 143: Line 143:


The user Helmoony is mass-removing "Tunisian arabic" in articles that was in place since several months. after the debate in Tunisia portal in september, an admin finally decided to grant the mention of Tunisian arabic for the names of people and places. Things were so settled since then, but the user Helmoony is recently removing all the mentions, could you please do something about it ? Thank you.[[User:Zangouang|Zangouang]] ([[User talk:Zangouang|talk]]) 16:22, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
The user Helmoony is mass-removing "Tunisian arabic" in articles that was in place since several months. after the debate in Tunisia portal in september, an admin finally decided to grant the mention of Tunisian arabic for the names of people and places. Things were so settled since then, but the user Helmoony is recently removing all the mentions, could you please do something about it ? Thank you.[[User:Zangouang|Zangouang]] ([[User talk:Zangouang|talk]]) 16:22, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
:I see you messaged many admins, some of whom correctly noted to report to [[WP:ANI]] including links to articles and proper diffs. However, as you mentioned a request for rollback, I checked your account which is relatively new and fails in-between [[WP:SOCK|sock]] blocks for accounts used for a master [[User: Exacrion]] (though the last name being [[User:Tounsimentounes]] blocked 4 Jan 2016 for sock puppetry). After a look through that names' contribs and style, and others related to Exacrion, I believe more than reasonably your account is a sock puppet for the aforementioned reasons. Should an unblock request be lodged and or a checkuser be requested and either finding differ from mine I am happy for another admin to unblock. [[User:NJA|<em style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;color:#6600CC">'''NJA'''</em>]] <small>[[User talk:NJA|<em style="color:#63D1F4">'''(t/</em>]][[Special:Contributions/NJA|<em style="color:#63D1F4">c)</em>]]'''</small> 07:49, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:49, 6 January 2016

Welcome to NJA's talk page!
Please click here to leave me a new message.
Archives

0102030405
06070809101112

The admins' T-shirt. Acalamari 20:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

she is an spaztik — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.114.177 (talk) 12:44, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GAN December 2013 Backlog Drive

Hello! Just a friendly reminder that the GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on December 31, 2013!

If you know anyone outside of the WikiProject that may be interested, feel free to invite them to the drive!

If you have any questions or want to comment about something regarding the drive, post them here--EdwardsBot (talk) 00:03, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive

It's that time again! Starting on March 1, there will be another GAN Backlog Drive! There will be several changes compared to previous drives:

  • This drive will introduce a new component to it; a point system. In a nutshell, older nominations are worth more points than newer nominations. The top 3 participants who have the points will be awarded the Golden, Silver, or Bronze Wikipedia Puzzle Piece Trophy, respectively.
  • Unlike the December 2013 Backlog Drive, earning an additional barnstar if you reached your goal has been removed.
  • The allowance to have insufficient reviews has been lowered to 2 before being disqualified.
  • An exception to the rule that all reviews must be completed before the deadline has been created.

Also, something that I thought I would share with all of you is that we raised $20.88 (USD) for the WMF in the December 2013 drive. It may not sound like a lot but considering that that was raised just because we reviewed articles, I would say that's pretty good! With that success, pledges can be made for the upcoming drive if you wish.

More info regarding the drive and full descriptions regarding the changes to this drive can be found on the the drive page. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on the drive talk page.

I look forward to your participation and hope that because of it, some day the backlog will be gone!

--Dom497

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GAN March 2014 Backlog Drive

The March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on April 1, 2014! Sent by Dom497 on behalf of MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good articles Future GAN Backlog Drive

Hello everyone! Hope you've all been having a great summer!

TheQ Editor recently proposed the idea of having another Backlog Drive in either September/October or November/December of this year. For those of you who have participated in the past two drives you know I was the one who organized them, however, come September, this will be my most important year in school so I will not be able to coordinate this drive (if it happens). TheQ Editor has volunteered to be a coordinator for the drive. If any of you would like to co-coordinator, please notify TheQ Editor on his talk page.

If you would be interested in participating in a Backlog Drive sometime before the end of this year, please notify TheQ Editor. Also, make sure to specify what month(s) work best for you.

At the time this message was sent out, the backlog was at 520 nominations. Since May, the backlog has been steadily increasing and we are currently near an all time high. Even though the backlog will not disappear over one drive, this drive can lead to several others which will (hopefully) lead to the day where there is no longer a backlog.

As always, the more participants, the better, and everyone is encouraged to participate!

Sent by Dom497--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Cup

Hello everyone! We hope you have all been having a great summer!

As we all know, the recent GAN Backlog Drives have not had any big impact on the backlog. Because of that, me (Dom497), Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor have worked on an idea that could possibly finally put a dent into the massive backlog. Now, I will admit, the idea isn't entirely ours as we have took the general idea of the WikiCup and brought it over to WikiProject Good Articles. But anyways, here's what we have in mind:

For all of you that do not know what the WikiCup is, it is an annual competition between several editors to see who can get the most Good Articles, Featured Article's, Did You Know's, etc. Based of this, we propose to you the GA Cup. This competition will only focus on reviewing Good articles.

For more info on the proposal, click here. As a FYI, the proposal page is not what the final product will look like (if you do go ahead with this idea). It will look very similar to WikiCup's page(s).

The discussion for the proposal will take place here. Please let us know if you are interested, have any concerns, things to consider, etc.

--Dom497, Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles - GA Cup

WikiProject Good Articles's 2014-15 GA Cup

WikiProject Good articles is holding a new competition, the GA Cup, from October 1, 2014 - March 28, 2015. The Cup will be based on reviewing Good article nominations; for each review, points will be awarded with bonuses for older nominations, longer articles and comprehensive reviews. All participants will start off in one group and the highest scoring participants will go through to the second round. At the moment six rounds are planned, but this may change based on participant numbers.

Some of you may ask: what is the purpose for a competition of this type? Currently, there is a backlog of about 500 unreviewed Good article nominations, almost an all time high. It is our hope that we can decrease the backlog in a fun way, through friendly competition.

Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors! Sign-ups will be open until October 15, 2014 so sign-up now!

If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the four judges.

Cheers from NickGibson3900, Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To receive future GA Cup newsletter, please add your name to our mailing list.

Message from Nij4829

I am not wishing to tread on anyone's toes or cause any friction, but I created a page earlier which was removed by because the admin thinks I was promoting or advertising and received a warning that I could get banned.

This was my first creation, and was in no way meant as a promotion or advertising, it was simply a page for a grassroots motor sport that I appreciate. I can on reflection see his issues with it, but they were a honest mistake. I would like the chance to rectify this if at all possible.

Sorry for any issues caused — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nij4829 (talkcontribs) 18:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this in regard to the Modstox page, no worries. NJA (t/c) 09:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you were an admin involved in a deletion decision for the article Alan Roger Currie several years ago. Well, the article is back, this time as Alan Roger Currie (American author). I have gone over the references, and they appear legit to me, but I don't understand why the article was not recreated under Alan Roger Currie unless the page creator is trying to avoid another deletion discussion (which, if the refs are legit, shouldn't matter, no?). I attempted to contact the admin who closed the most recent (second) deletion discussion for Alan Roger Currie, but it looks like he vanished from Wikipedia five years ago and hasn't been seen since. Anyhow, something about this seems a bit fishy to me, and I wanted to ask someone with more authority than me to consider looking into it. Would you be willing to check it out? Thanks! KDS4444Talk 22:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, I've had a look and agree it should be Alan Roger Currie vs the page likely created to avoid deletion so I moved it. Couldn't justify deletion upon reading it but I did tag it for a few issues I found. Cheers. NJA (t/c) 08:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the change from Alan Roger Currie (American author) to simply Alan Roger Currie Chicago Smooth (talk) 14:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to subscribe to the edit filter mailing list

Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton (talk) and MusikAnimal talk 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I shall take a look :) NJA (t/c) 06:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for a violation of the username policy

Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for a violation of the username policy, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting rollback

The user Helmoony is mass-removing "Tunisian arabic" in articles that was in place since several months. after the debate in Tunisia portal in september, an admin finally decided to grant the mention of Tunisian arabic for the names of people and places. Things were so settled since then, but the user Helmoony is recently removing all the mentions, could you please do something about it ? Thank you.Zangouang (talk) 16:22, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you messaged many admins, some of whom correctly noted to report to WP:ANI including links to articles and proper diffs. However, as you mentioned a request for rollback, I checked your account which is relatively new and fails in-between sock blocks for accounts used for a master User: Exacrion (though the last name being User:Tounsimentounes blocked 4 Jan 2016 for sock puppetry). After a look through that names' contribs and style, and others related to Exacrion, I believe more than reasonably your account is a sock puppet for the aforementioned reasons. Should an unblock request be lodged and or a checkuser be requested and either finding differ from mine I am happy for another admin to unblock. NJA (t/c) 07:49, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]