R v Elliott: Difference between revisions
→Background: Published material from widely distributed and well respected newspapers, properly referenced |
Reverted 1 pending edit by 174.89.157.123 to revision 701951836 by Ivanvector: Linkedin is not an acceptable source, and undue wait for a Blatchford opinion piece. |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Following her 2012 [[Kickstarter]] campaign for the ''[[Tropes vs. Women in Video Games]]'' video series, feminist critic [[Anita Sarkeesian]] began to receive large volumes of online criticism and harassment.<ref name="newstatesmanLooksLike"/><ref name="wiredSarkeesianFeminist"/> One form of harassment commonly decried in the media was a [[Newgrounds]] game in which players punched a photograph of Sarkeesian, causing her to appear progressively more bruised and injured.<ref name="cnetLookBad"/><ref name="newyorkerErupts"/><ref name="escapistBeatUp"/> The game's creator, Bendalin Spurr, who had previously made a similar game about punching [[Jack Thompson (activist)|Jack Thompson]],<ref name="cnetLookBad"/> denied that the game promoted real violence against women. Detractors countered by pointing out what they considered the misogynist tenor of Spurr's statements.<ref name="dailydotBeatUp"/> |
Following her 2012 [[Kickstarter]] campaign for the ''[[Tropes vs. Women in Video Games]]'' video series, feminist critic [[Anita Sarkeesian]] began to receive large volumes of online criticism and harassment.<ref name="newstatesmanLooksLike"/><ref name="wiredSarkeesianFeminist"/> One form of harassment commonly decried in the media was a [[Newgrounds]] game in which players punched a photograph of Sarkeesian, causing her to appear progressively more bruised and injured.<ref name="cnetLookBad"/><ref name="newyorkerErupts"/><ref name="escapistBeatUp"/> The game's creator, Bendalin Spurr, who had previously made a similar game about punching [[Jack Thompson (activist)|Jack Thompson]],<ref name="cnetLookBad"/> denied that the game promoted real violence against women. Detractors countered by pointing out what they considered the misogynist tenor of Spurr's statements.<ref name="dailydotBeatUp"/> |
||
Stephanie Guthrie, a Toronto-based feminist activist, was among those who objected to Spurr's game. Wanting to cause real-life consequences for Spurr's online activity, she contacted news organizations and potential employers in his hometown.<ref name="torontostandardUproar"/><ref name="thestarFrustrations"/> Gregory Alan Elliott, a Toronto artist,<ref name="torontoistCafe"/> criticized Guthrie's actions as "every bit as vicious as the face-punch game."<ref name="ocanadaWrath"/> Although Guthrie and other women blocked him on Twitter, the social networking website declined to intervene in the ongoing exchange, and Elliott continued tweeting criticism to their accounts and commenting on their online and offline activities.<ref name="thestarLeaveHerAlone"/><ref name="thestarFirstOfThree"/> |
Stephanie Guthrie, a Toronto-based feminist activist, was among those who objected to Spurr's game. Wanting to cause real-life consequences for Spurr's online activity, she contacted news organizations and potential employers in his hometown.<ref name="torontostandardUproar"/><ref name="thestarFrustrations"/> Gregory Alan Elliott, a Toronto artist,<ref name="torontoistCafe"/> criticized Guthrie's actions as "every bit as vicious as the face-punch game."<ref name="ocanadaWrath"/> Although Guthrie and other women blocked him on Twitter, the social networking website declined to intervene in the ongoing exchange, and Elliott continued tweeting criticism to their accounts and commenting on their online and offline activities.<ref name="thestarLeaveHerAlone"/><ref name="thestarFirstOfThree"/> An investigating officer found that none of Elliott's messages threatened harm against any of the women.<ref name="thestarWhenDoesTweeting"/> |
||
Stephanie Guthrie is a self-described "Gender Justice Consultant" who cultivated a following of feminists including Toronto Counselors Shelley Carroll and Kristyn Wong-Tam. <ref>https://ca.linkedin.com/in/stephguthrie</ref> She founded a 'grassroots' organization called WiTOPoli - Women in Toronto Politics <ref>http://witopoli.com/ </ref> whose mission statement is "amplifies women’s voices and promotes a more inclusive civic discourse for all women." |
|||
Investigating officer was Detective Jeff Bangild of the Toronto Police Service. He found that none of Elliott's messages threatened harm against any of the women.<ref name="thestarWhenDoesTweeting"/> |
|||
During proceedings, a letter was sent to Justice Brent Knazan and was characterized by him at the time as “unconventional and inappropriate” when read into the record. Parts of the letter, including the writer’s name, have been sealed by the court, but according to previous testimony, alleges a conspiracy between Guthrie and the two other complainants to fabricate a case against Elliott. Heather Reilly and Paisley Rae. The person also alleged the conspiracy extends “to the ministry of the attorney-general,” |
|||
The letter alleged the three women who accused Elliott “convened a meeting of friends to discuss how Elliott should be publicly shamed; they bombarded their followers with furious tweets and retweets about him (including a grotesque suggestion from someone pretending she was a 13-year-old that he was a pedophile)" <ref>http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/christie-blatchford-twitter-harassment-trial-halted-by-surprise-letter-alleging-fraudulent-conspiracy-against-accused </ref> |
|||
==Trial== |
==Trial== |
||
Revision as of 10:15, 28 January 2016
R v Elliott was a criminal harassment trial based in Toronto, Canada. Gregory Alan Elliott was charged with criminally harassing three women in the Toronto area, following a protracted dispute with feminist activist Stephanie Guthrie. The case had implications for free speech in Canada, and is thought to be the first prosecution for harassment solely involving activity on social networking website Twitter.[1]
Charges involving one of the women were dropped before trial. On January 22, 2016, Ontario Court Judge Brent Knazan dismissed the remaining charges of criminal harassment.[1][2] Elliott soon returned to Twitter after having been restricted from use of the site as a bail condition.[3]
Background
Following her 2012 Kickstarter campaign for the Tropes vs. Women in Video Games video series, feminist critic Anita Sarkeesian began to receive large volumes of online criticism and harassment.[4][5] One form of harassment commonly decried in the media was a Newgrounds game in which players punched a photograph of Sarkeesian, causing her to appear progressively more bruised and injured.[6][7][8] The game's creator, Bendalin Spurr, who had previously made a similar game about punching Jack Thompson,[6] denied that the game promoted real violence against women. Detractors countered by pointing out what they considered the misogynist tenor of Spurr's statements.[9]
Stephanie Guthrie, a Toronto-based feminist activist, was among those who objected to Spurr's game. Wanting to cause real-life consequences for Spurr's online activity, she contacted news organizations and potential employers in his hometown.[10][11] Gregory Alan Elliott, a Toronto artist,[12] criticized Guthrie's actions as "every bit as vicious as the face-punch game."[13] Although Guthrie and other women blocked him on Twitter, the social networking website declined to intervene in the ongoing exchange, and Elliott continued tweeting criticism to their accounts and commenting on their online and offline activities.[14][15] An investigating officer found that none of Elliott's messages threatened harm against any of the women.[16]
Trial
Elliott was charged by the Crown in November 2012 for breach of a peace bond and criminal harassment of Guthrie, and two other accusers subsequently went to police in January 2013.[15][16] The charge related to one of the women was subsequently dropped.[17] Elliott was released on bail on the condition that he did not tweet or access Twitter, have a smartphone or use a computer with Internet access.[18]
The case hinged on whether the women reasonably feared for their safety.[14][19] In cross-examination, Guthrie defended her continued tweeting about Elliott after having blocked him as being a means of fighting back against harassment.[3]
The trial had to be delayed in March 2014 after the judge received a signed letter alleging a conspiracy against Elliott that included the Ministry of the Attorney General.[20]
On January 22, 2016, all charges against Elliott of criminal harassment were dismissed. Judge Knazan said Elliott's tweets contained nothing of a "violent or sexual nature," and there was no indication he intended to hurt the women.[2]
Reactions
Elliott is believed to be the first Canadian prosecuted solely for tweets, and several commentators believe the case has significant implications for free expression and freedom of speech in Canada.[1][14][17][19]
A Toronto coffee shop has been the subject of controversy over artwork by Elliott that the shop displays.[12]
References
- ^ a b c Csanady, Ashley (January 22, 2016). "Toronto man found not guilty in Twitter harassment trial widely viewed as a Canadian first". National Post. Retrieved January 22, 2016.
- ^ a b "Gregory Alan Elliott not guilty in Twitter harassment case". CBC News. January 22, 2016. Retrieved January 25, 2016.
- ^ a b Cross, Jessica Smith (July 21, 2015). "Women had a right to fight back, Crown argues in Toronto Twitter harassment trial". Metro News.
- ^ Lewis, Helen (July 6, 2012). "This is what online harassment looks like". New Statesman.
- ^ Watercutter, Angela (June 14, 2012). "Feminist take on games draws crude ridicule, massive support". Wired.
- ^ a b Starr, Michelle (July 10, 2012). "How to make gamers look bad". CNET.
- ^ Parkin, Simon (October 17, 2014). "Gamergate: A Scandal Erupts in the Video-Game Community". The New Yorker.
- ^ Funk, John (July 6, 2012). "Flash Game Makes Players Beat Up "Tropes vs. Women" Creator". The Escapist.
- ^ Klee, Miles (October 20, 2014). "Creator of 'Beat Up Anita Sarkeesian' says #Gamergate is anti-harassment". The Daily Dot.
- ^ Lyonnais, Sheena (July 9, 2012). "Toronto Tweeter Causes Uproar Over Violent "Beat Up Anita Sarkeesian" Game". Toronto Standard.
- ^ Casey, Liam (January 9, 2014). "Gregory Alan Elliott: Frustrations boil over in Twitter harassment trial". Toronto Star.
- ^ a b Niedoba, Sarah (October 21, 2015). "Extra, Extra: John Tory Talks SmartTrack in London, Back to the Future for the Jays, and a Café Criticized for its Art". Torontoist.
- ^ Blatchford, Christie (May 7, 2014). "Harassment case examines consequences of Internet wrath". Canada.com.
- ^ a b c Hasham, Alyshah (July 24, 2014). "Twitter harassment trial: Second complainant says accused wouldn't leave her alone". Toronto Star.
- ^ a b Casey, Liam (January 8, 2014). "First of three Toronto women testifies in Twitter harassment trial". Toronto Star.
- ^ a b Hasham, Alyshah (January 7, 2014). "When does tweeting become criminal harassment?". Toronto Star. Retrieved January 21, 2016.
- ^ a b Nadeau, Jean-Phillippe (October 6, 2015). "Procès pour harcèlement criminel sur Twitter" [Trial for criminal harassment on Twitter]. CBC Radio Canada (in French).
- ^ http://www.metronews.ca/news/toronto/2012/11/23/alleged-twitter-harasser-gregory-alan-elliott-released-on-bail.html
- ^ a b Chittley, Jordan (January 7, 2014). "Toronto harassment case may show how tweets can lead to jail". CTV News.
- ^ Blatchford, Christie (March 20, 2014). "Christie Blatchford: Twitter harassment trial halted by surprise letter alleging 'fraudulent' conspiracy against accused". National Post. Retrieved January 22, 2016.