Jump to content

User talk:Kailash29792: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Kailash29792/Archive 20) (bot
→‎Two-face: new section
Line 111: Line 111:
:::Calling somebody as 'lunatic' definitely constitutes a [[WP:NPA]]. Please be careful with your wordings. :) <span style="white-space:nowrap;">&mdash;[[User:Vensatry|<font color = "indigo" >'''Vensatry'''</font>]] <sub> [[User talk:Vensatry|<font color = "Indigo" >'''(Talk)'''</font>]] </sub></span> 16:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
:::Calling somebody as 'lunatic' definitely constitutes a [[WP:NPA]]. Please be careful with your wordings. :) <span style="white-space:nowrap;">&mdash;[[User:Vensatry|<font color = "indigo" >'''Vensatry'''</font>]] <sub> [[User talk:Vensatry|<font color = "Indigo" >'''(Talk)'''</font>]] </sub></span> 16:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
::::I guess "lunatic" was once a medical term used neutrally by scientists and doctors, but became a victim of the [[euphemism treadmill]]. I used it neutrally though. [[User:Kailash29792|Kailash29792]] ([[User talk:Kailash29792#top|talk]]) 17:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
::::I guess "lunatic" was once a medical term used neutrally by scientists and doctors, but became a victim of the [[euphemism treadmill]]. I used it neutrally though. [[User:Kailash29792|Kailash29792]] ([[User talk:Kailash29792#top|talk]]) 17:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

== Two-face ==

Stop playing this two-face game with me. I have done nothing wrong to you or anybody. I work hard as much as you do. Instead I get rewarded backlash for my hard work here. Saying "the lunatic user" is as disgusting as an abuse. It seems you are living in a bubble and don't want to see the truth. I have seen many posts of you, mostly bad-mouthing about me to Krimuk and others. Calling me a sick/mad/ill user won't change the fact that you only see one side of the story. The discussion on Shahid Kapoor was started by {{u|Dr. Blofeld}} and everything was going smooth until his outburst to what he thought was right. But wikipedia doesn't work like that, does it? Where did you see my fault in that. I have given so many days working here, despite being subjected to constant hate from people like you and others. I also could have behaved the way he did, but I have understood what I should be doing here for the betterment of this site. I would like to suggest you to please refrain from using such blunt and highly abusive words for me, its discouraging. No one has ever encouraged me here and I only hear bad things and discouraging texts from users like you, who first pretend to be a friend and than turns out to be a foe.[[User:Krish!|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:Red">'''''Krish'''''</span>]] | [[User talk:Krish!|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:Black">'''''Talk'''''</span>]] 07:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:03, 14 February 2016

27 May 2015

Happy New Year, Kailash29792

Cheers!

Thank You for the guidance Kailash!

D

My flc

I have nominated this for the flc. I hope to get some constructive comments from you, for further improvements of the list. I would appreciate it. Thanks!Krish | Talk 13:13, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Favour?

Can you please add page nos. for the corresponding films in the Ref. column of the table here? I cannot find out page nos. in the kindle. Vensatry (Talk) 16:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Lemme guess... a potential FAC? Kailash29792 (talk) 16:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
List! Vensatry (Talk) 16:17, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you for being one of the few editors who came forward (or at least gave a positive reply to the request) to help me review Kalki Koechlin, now a GA! Numerounovedant (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rajini murugan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rajini murugan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi bro, just I want to know y Telugu/Tamil actress Nayanthara is re-written in wiki as Nayantara!! As so many news websites recently revealed her passport, issue In that aslo its clearly wriiten as NAYANTHARA[1][2][3] and in other articles TOO[4] So by showing this references, can I move the page to NAYANTHARA ??? just i want to know ur suggestion.
Fygu, you may tag "Nayantara" for deletion (WP:G6) and move "Nayanthara" to it. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aha Naa Pellanta

I was watching this today and there was a rather funny parody of a Tamil song from 50:53 to 52:02 here. Can you please let me know which film's song that was? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I have no clue. And sorry for the late reply. Kailash29792 (talk) 02:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's okay. I watched that film again because it was Brahmanandam's debut. Any clue about the song, Ssven2? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That Tamil song is "Yarukkaga" from the film Vasantha Maligai starring Sivaji Ganesan. Srivin (talk) 05:18, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Aha Naa Pellanta" (Wow! It is my marriage) is from Mayabazar (1957) where Savitri sings in front of a mirror. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhysicsScientist (talkcontribs) 05:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to both of you Srivin and PhysicsScientist! After watching the original song in YouTube, i find this parody even more funny! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have a small doubt and i hope you can clarify it. If you can observe this, the rationale says, "as of 2016, works published prior to 1 January 1956 are considered public domain" and those works include "Anonymous works, photographs, cinematographic works, sound recordings, government works, and works of corporate authorship or of international organizations". I wanted a free file of N. T. Rama Rao and this got me thinking. Can i use a screenshot of any of his films released before 1 January 1956 and upload it as a free file? I request your opinion in this case. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck with that. It's best that you upload an image via Commons. But there would certainly be some pre-1956 portrait of NTR, right? Kailash29792 (talk) 06:47, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There are, but it might be challenged saying that we require a proof about the same. So, i've decided to follow the likes of Rod Steiger and Madhubala. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the upload of N. T. Rama Rao from Missamma. If this stands the test of time, we can surely have so many legitimate free images of actors from their films released before 1956. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 07:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kailash29792,

This is regarding an edit in an article, the city has a separate railway station and it is too far from Jhansi railway station, then why category has been added in the Banda article, forgive me for using different justification.

Work2win (talk) 21:45, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Killer Frost Panabaker.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Killer Frost Panabaker.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NeoBatfreak (talk) 22:00, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My roommate taught it to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhysicsScientist (talkcontribs) 01:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Good Humor
Couldn't resist myself after seeing this one. :) Vensatry (Talk) 08:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would have called the film "action comedy", but since the latter genre is not the main focus (it would then look like Rush Hour, but it does have many light moments), I left it out. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:07, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bro, just came back from watching it at the The Forum Vijaya. Do watch it when you get the opportunity to do so. A really great and grim egg!  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 16:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi protection

Can you withdraw your request? Also, indefinite semi-protection to talk pages is very unlikely to be done. Vensatry (Talk) 18:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know that I was trying to protect you? Because even a Sherlock Holmes or Jessica Jones cannot trace that abuser, but we Wikipedians can prevent him from doing anything here. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:44, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I know who it is. It could well be solved without the page being semi-protected. I'm sure you'll understand what I'm saying. Vensatry (Talk) 18:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Calling somebody as 'lunatic' definitely constitutes a WP:NPA. Please be careful with your wordings. :) Vensatry (Talk) 16:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I guess "lunatic" was once a medical term used neutrally by scientists and doctors, but became a victim of the euphemism treadmill. I used it neutrally though. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two-face

Stop playing this two-face game with me. I have done nothing wrong to you or anybody. I work hard as much as you do. Instead I get rewarded backlash for my hard work here. Saying "the lunatic user" is as disgusting as an abuse. It seems you are living in a bubble and don't want to see the truth. I have seen many posts of you, mostly bad-mouthing about me to Krimuk and others. Calling me a sick/mad/ill user won't change the fact that you only see one side of the story. The discussion on Shahid Kapoor was started by Dr. Blofeld and everything was going smooth until his outburst to what he thought was right. But wikipedia doesn't work like that, does it? Where did you see my fault in that. I have given so many days working here, despite being subjected to constant hate from people like you and others. I also could have behaved the way he did, but I have understood what I should be doing here for the betterment of this site. I would like to suggest you to please refrain from using such blunt and highly abusive words for me, its discouraging. No one has ever encouraged me here and I only hear bad things and discouraging texts from users like you, who first pretend to be a friend and than turns out to be a foe.Krish | Talk 07:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]