User talk:Kailash29792/Archive 35
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Kailash29792. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 30 | ← | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | → | Archive 40 |
Happy Dipawali
Happy Dipawali Kailash ! |
-Gazal world (talk) 11:04, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Dear Kailash29792! I found new poster of Natasaarvabhowma[1], you can upload instead first look and find poster of Nenu Local and Vajrakaya? Thank you! --178.71.203.109 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:06, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Dear Kailash29792! I found poster of Goodachari [2] instead first look, Arrambam, Veeram (2014 film) and Aadu Magaadra Bujji? Thank you and Happy Deepavali! --178.66.104.251 (talk) 16:08, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- I don't know if I can any longer obey such requests. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:32, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:10, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:60 Vayadu Maaniram.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:60 Vayadu Maaniram.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Fan Poster.
Hi,
This a fan poster, which is uploaded on Twitter. Now a days, fans are making cool poster that even better than official. Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 05:19, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- How do you know if it is a fan-made poster? It was there on moviebuff.com, which is supposed to upload only official posters. --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:34, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Here is source. Movie buff are confused. Even I also made fan poster [3]. Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 05:37, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Sathi Leelavathi
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Sathi Leelavathi (1936 film) has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Best of luck with the GAN.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 17:13, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mary Poppins Returns poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mary Poppins Returns poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
S. V. Subbaiah
May I know why you removed the Co-actors column? --UKSharma3 (User | talk | Contribs) 01:50, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- The reason is because such columns are trivial. Also, I was trying to follow the style of many featured lists (top quality) such as MGR filmography, not start an edit war. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:58, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- MGR was a hero. But SVS was only a supporting actor except in Mangaiyar Thilakam. Therefore, it may help to show the important artistes who acted with him. I don't know but if you think that is trivia, just forget it. I only wanted to know the reason. --UKSharma3 (User | talk | Contribs) 11:53, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Supergirl (season 3)
Was there a reason as to why you just removed the episode summaries[4] instead of transcluding the table properly, in an identical fashion to all of the other season articles? -- AlexTW 06:44, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- Not any malicious reason... unlike what some people think. Perhaps just lack of experience. I left an edit summary stating "someone please remove all the plot summaries" since I didn't know how to properly transclude. But when I saw the style of seasons 1 and 2, I thought I knew what to do: just remove the plot summaries. It seems quite obvious somewhere I slipped, and I apologise for that; also thank you for transcluding properly. --Kailash29792 (talk) 06:51, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
The Little Mermaid (upcoming Universal film) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Little Mermaid (upcoming Universal film). Since you had some involvement with the The Little Mermaid (upcoming Universal film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:37, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
AR Murugadoss Untitled Project listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect AR Murugadoss Untitled Project. Since you had some involvement with the AR Murugadoss Untitled Project redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 05:45, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Bhaktha Naradar
Can you please find a poster for this film? How to search for posters and ads in old Indian Express newspaper?--UKSharma3 (User | talk | Contribs) 02:53, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- Over here, we type the year in the date bar, then we get all the available months. Typically, these papers have posters reading "From Today", indicating the film released on the same date as the paper is published. Are you sure Bhaktha Naradar was released on 25 April 1942? I searched that day's paper, but did not find a poster... or maybe it was released on a different date (although this source says 25 April). Perhaps Kanags has a poster; he collects posters from that era and uploads them on Commons. --Kailash29792 (talk) 03:54, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you --UKSharma3 (User | talk | Contribs) 06:13, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Untitled K. V. Anand-Vijay Sethupathy project listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled K. V. Anand-Vijay Sethupathy project. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled K. V. Anand-Vijay Sethupathy project redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 05:49, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Dear Kailash29792! I saw the article Rajadhani 2, check please this article, this film not filmed, without references, and maybe it's lie about Puneeth Rajkumar and lead heroine Haripriya in this film, they are collaborated only once in Anjani Putra? Thanks! --178.66.214.223 (talk) 06:15, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Sci-Fi Action
Kailash, I think you're misunderstanding. Of course, you aren't the only one to do this but please try to undertstand that science fiction-action is not a genre salad. It's a SUBGENRE on its own.
You can read here:
"Sharing many of the conventions of the science fiction film, sci-fi action emphasizes gunplay, space battles, and invented weaponry. Through the Terminator films, Arnold Schwartznegger became the most visible hero of the genre, and James Cameron it's progenitor. In both The Terminator and Terminator 2, as well as Aliens, Cameron's focus was not on the possibilities for satirical comment or prophecy inherent in science fiction, but rather on the often brutal violence that could be inflicted with futuristic weaponry. Paul Verhoeven managed a more cynical and satiric blend with action in his films RoboCop, Total Recall, and Starship Troopers, but they remained in the world of the actioner. The subgenre was most popular in the late '80s and early '90s, perhaps in response to the more violent but cooler future that seemed imminent during the reign of Ronald Reagan and the Star Wars missile defense system." Read more at https://www.allmovie.com/subgenre/sci-fi-action-d564#VFRT668QzsF50DsT.99"
Even Wikipedia says that sci-fi action is a subgenre of action which blends sci-fi. It's also a subgenre of sci-fi.
Otherwise it might even mean just a sci-fi sans any action or whatever else there is. Enthiran is a sci-fi action film, even that source said which you warned to "take to the noticeboard". Just sci-fi would mean a film concerned (only) with science, inventions and discoveries.
And as for other genres, I agree it has a pinch of romance, a bit of drama, comedy and suspense, but those things are very minimal. And this film is NOT a romance. A romance is in entirety about romance. This one is about the manipulation of invention which turns destructive.
WP:FILMLEAD, as I said before, allows the main or the subgenre to be written as long as a source verifies it. Sci-fi isn't a broad term as you said. But if it is, then historical fiction should be a broader term too. But if everything is already so BROAD, why do we have subgenres then? SF has so many of them:
- Alien film - Psychological SF - SF Action - SF drama - SF comedy - Space adventure - Tech noir etc.
And yes, don't think sci-fi to be as broad as superhero film because superhero film isn't a main genre in itself. It's a subgenre of action movies (adventure also) and thus there's no point in your comparing a genre to a subgenre. This (combining multiple genres) is also the case with masala movies. Had you said this in case it was supposed to be a masala flick, I would have readily agreed. And it's also a subgenre. But not here... SF is anything but not a subgenre or really BROAD in terms of blending other genres.
And if you still wish to do what you want to, let's see... I've done my part explaining you. (77Survivor (talk) 16:40, 6 December 2018 (UTC))
- I agree I should have discussed this during the FAC, but I did not want to go genre overbloat or violate WP:SEAOFBLUE; maybe there's a reason why Get Out is not listed as a comedy horror or satirical psychological horror thriller film; or Back to the Future as a science fiction comedy film (my edit was once reverted). In fact, the editors of the MCU articles too are avoiding adding multiple genres to film leads, and simply describe each with the unfortunately made blanket term "superhero film". Perhaps that's why Captain America: Civil War is not a science fiction political thriller or Spider-Man: Homecoming a coming-of-age action comedy. But my prime reason for not adding any genre after sci-fi in Enthiran is not because I want the article not to deviate from its FA-pass version. It is so that no-one else expands the genre to absurd lengths such as "musical science fiction action thriller" or such. FAC co-nominator Ssven2, what is your opinion? Kailash29792 (talk) 17:15, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
But does that mean we should not make viewers aware of what they already aren't? Just like you, so many editors... even I didn't know that sci-fi action is a subgenre. It's only because I've done a lot of research on film genres that I'm now aware of this. If people don't know there's a subgenre called sci-fi action, the sources can explain. Don't know what's wrong with my explanation that whenever I'm explaining an editor about sci-fi action, he's normally talking the same "overbloat" stuff.
I've had enough of this. I didn't make it sci-fi action musical thriller because nothing as such exists. We use subgenres, don't we? We say action thriller, crime drama, action comedy, political drama etc and so is sci-fi action. I'm aware of the fact that Enthiran has songs but in a musical it's not just about the breaking into songs but acting through songs/dance that make a musical. Secondly, as for the thriller part, the kind of suspense (little bit of it) is normally attached in any other sci-fi action movie. If it was about choosing between two subgenres, I could've chosen one instead of overbloating.
I know we both have good intentions on this, but please let's allow Wikipedia to be more expansive. Would you've allowed something like a "post apocalyptic sci-fi" because it feels long? Here I can agree if you didn't really allow the word "post apocalyptic" because it's already a part of sci-fi. But action? or adventure? It's not already a part of sci-fi. That's why, again, we have subgenres, so as to summarize what just one genre can't. Just sci-fi could even mean pure sci-fi.
And why so worried? No one will overbloat it as long as WE are here. If you're not allowing ME to expand the term, why would you or any other editor allow others to make long edits. Especially in the case of Enthiran, no one is going to do that because there's really no other way to think of this film other than an action film and science fiction film, or simply sci-fi action film. (77Survivor (talk) 18:05, 6 December 2018 (UTC))
vijay wife british citizen
his son also british citizen and Vijay won a internationmal award so mention--Hjkl12345 (talk) 11:53, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overseas_Citizenship_of_India its called OCI card — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hjkl12345 (talk • contribs) 12:51, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
dude read the physical appearance headline you will find about oci card thanks dont argue if you dont know--Hjkl12345 (talk) 13:00, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
dude and one more stuff why do a tamil actor get nominated in uk awards it also makes sense so only I added that source--Hjkl12345 (talk) 14:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
Black Siren
Good catch with the redirect page. --Gonnym (talk) 13:35, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- Now I've undone my own edit, and instead opened a move request. --Kailash29792 (talk) 13:50, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
Draft:The Flash (season 2)
Hey! Great job on getting the draft for season 2 of The Flash ready for mainspace. I think if you expand the critical response section more than we should be all good to move it to the mainspace. Let me know if you need help finding sources. - Brojam (talk) 08:20, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- Brojam, thanks for the compliments, but adding reviews about entire seasons hasn't exactly been my strong point. One possible reason is, there aren't enough reviews for the whole season; only individual episodes (I can try expanding using IGN and EW's existing reviews). I'm also not entirely well-versed with the concept of showrunners, and I think you can solve that in the "development" section. --Kailash29792 (talk) 08:28, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- I've checked the showrunners part and it looks all good. Still have not found a source confirming when the Helbing brothers actually joined during the season as showrunners, but I don't think it's obligatory to include that detail. I feel the same about reviews. It's quite hard to find good reviews talking about the entire season. Most are about single episodes and just including the season premiere and finale really doesn't paint the season fairly. I've added some sources that hopefully will help you. Maybe looking at Rotten Tomatoes reviews separated by each episode and picking a few throughout the season would give a better picture as a whole. I found there was a lot of praise for the "Welcome to Earth-2" episode so I added some links to good reviews for that one. Pinging @Dhalh: (who seems to be good at writing critical response sections) if you have any free time and what to try expanding the critical response section of Draft:The Flash (season 2) that would be really appreciated. - Brojam (talk) 00:49, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, Brojam. Looking over the section, it does look pretty thorough to me, but I will look into the hidden sources and see what I can come up with. I may reorganize a bit, if that’s all right. The format that I’ve been working with so far is fairly chronological. For example, Paragraph 1: Overall quantitative data (review aggregation), Paragraph 2: Premiere reviews, Paragraphs 3-4: Midseason reviews and any stand-out episodes or crossovers, Paragraphs 5-6: Finale & overall season reviews including year-end lists (many finale reviews also reflect on the season as a whole). How strictly I follow the format will depend on how much material can be pulled, but that’s how I’d like to organize. I find that it makes expansion easier. Thoughts? Dhalh (talk) 05:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- What I needed to do has been done: make the article look polished enough to enter the mainspace. Dhalh, yes the reception section may need some reduction. I think "Welcome to Earth-2" may need a separate article, and the reviews transferred to it. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Ya, I was wondering if we should create an article on that episode after finding all those positive reviews. Would need to see if there's enough development and production info to warrant a separate article. I'll see what I can come up with. There's also "The Runaway Dinosaur" from season 2 that could get a separate article, in addition to the season finale (which I already have a draft in my sandbox). Regardless, we should still have reviews about that episode on the season article. - Brojam (talk) 05:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Dhalh: Feel free to make any changes and add any other reviews (there are a lot on Rotten Tomatoes). I really like that format. Very clear and structured and as you said easy to expand. - Brojam (talk) 05:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Dhalh and Brojam, I have created Draft:Welcome to Earth-2. Apart from yvrshoots, I can't find any other source about the production. Kailash29792 (talk) 16:33, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Dhalh: Feel free to make any changes and add any other reviews (there are a lot on Rotten Tomatoes). I really like that format. Very clear and structured and as you said easy to expand. - Brojam (talk) 05:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Ya, I was wondering if we should create an article on that episode after finding all those positive reviews. Would need to see if there's enough development and production info to warrant a separate article. I'll see what I can come up with. There's also "The Runaway Dinosaur" from season 2 that could get a separate article, in addition to the season finale (which I already have a draft in my sandbox). Regardless, we should still have reviews about that episode on the season article. - Brojam (talk) 05:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- What I needed to do has been done: make the article look polished enough to enter the mainspace. Dhalh, yes the reception section may need some reduction. I think "Welcome to Earth-2" may need a separate article, and the reviews transferred to it. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, Brojam. Looking over the section, it does look pretty thorough to me, but I will look into the hidden sources and see what I can come up with. I may reorganize a bit, if that’s all right. The format that I’ve been working with so far is fairly chronological. For example, Paragraph 1: Overall quantitative data (review aggregation), Paragraph 2: Premiere reviews, Paragraphs 3-4: Midseason reviews and any stand-out episodes or crossovers, Paragraphs 5-6: Finale & overall season reviews including year-end lists (many finale reviews also reflect on the season as a whole). How strictly I follow the format will depend on how much material can be pulled, but that’s how I’d like to organize. I find that it makes expansion easier. Thoughts? Dhalh (talk) 05:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- I've checked the showrunners part and it looks all good. Still have not found a source confirming when the Helbing brothers actually joined during the season as showrunners, but I don't think it's obligatory to include that detail. I feel the same about reviews. It's quite hard to find good reviews talking about the entire season. Most are about single episodes and just including the season premiere and finale really doesn't paint the season fairly. I've added some sources that hopefully will help you. Maybe looking at Rotten Tomatoes reviews separated by each episode and picking a few throughout the season would give a better picture as a whole. I found there was a lot of praise for the "Welcome to Earth-2" episode so I added some links to good reviews for that one. Pinging @Dhalh: (who seems to be good at writing critical response sections) if you have any free time and what to try expanding the critical response section of Draft:The Flash (season 2) that would be really appreciated. - Brojam (talk) 00:49, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Poster
Dead Kailash29792! Can you find and upload posters of Nenu Local, Veeram (2014 film), Vajrakaya and Vunnadhi Okate Zindagi, Ongole Gittha instead first look? --178.66.96.80 (talk) 16:38, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- Just post the links please, and I'll consider. --Kailash29792 (talk) 16:50, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- I found posters [5] for Nenu Local, [6] for Vunnadhi Okate Zindagi, Veeram (2014 film) [7] for The Villain (2018 film) [8] which two heroes with heroine (Amy Jackson), Vajrakaya [9] and you can upload? Thanks! --178.71.211.25 (talk) 11:39, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- I found posters of movies Bhale Bhale Magadivoy [10], Duvvada Jagannadham [11], Nata Sarvabhouma (2018 film) [12], Julai [13], A Aa [14], Ninnindale you can upload instead first looks? Thanks! —-178.67.5.38 (talk) 13:36, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- Give me a break, please! This week has been rather busy for me, and might be so until Saturday. Kailash29792 (talk) 19:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
- I found posters of movies Bhale Bhale Magadivoy [10], Duvvada Jagannadham [11], Nata Sarvabhouma (2018 film) [12], Julai [13], A Aa [14], Ninnindale you can upload instead first looks? Thanks! —-178.67.5.38 (talk) 13:36, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
- I found posters [5] for Nenu Local, [6] for Vunnadhi Okate Zindagi, Veeram (2014 film) [7] for The Villain (2018 film) [8] which two heroes with heroine (Amy Jackson), Vajrakaya [9] and you can upload? Thanks! --178.71.211.25 (talk) 11:39, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Earth-2
Dhalh and Brojam, I've decided to bring the draft to the mainspace, there's just one thing to solve: there is a statement reading It was the series' highest rating in the 18–34 demographic since its premiere and highest 18–49 rating since the crossover "Flash vs. Arrow". I'm not exactly good at finding sources for TV ratings, can someone please deal with it? Once it is done, it is good to go. --Kailash29792 (talk) 10:53, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- Ya, no problem. I’ll add it to the article later today. - Brojam (talk) 11:02, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- Done. You should be good to move it. Let me know if you need help making the move. I'm not sure about the filming section since it's all from Hollywood North, which is not a reliable source. - Brojam (talk) 05:07, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- If Hollywood North is not a reliable source, I don't know any other source that reports independently about the filming. This and this trace back to YVRShoots (Hollywood North), hence they are WP:FRUIT. --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Done. You should be good to move it. Let me know if you need help making the move. I'm not sure about the filming section since it's all from Hollywood North, which is not a reliable source. - Brojam (talk) 05:07, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Merry Christmas to all!
We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2019! | |
Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless! — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 16:43, 25 December 2018 (UTC) |
Message
Hi Kailash, I would like to know why you reverted the changes which I made to the page on "Anniyan". I have contributed to improve the page. I hope you accept the changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishna51284 (talk • contribs) 09:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Because one of the edits violated MOS:DOCTOR, and the other was too descriptive. --Kailash29792 (talk) 11:18, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Ok Thank you. I shall learn about the rules of editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishna51284 (talk • contribs) 08:21, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
A. T. Krishnaswamy
This title has been re-directed to Sabapathy. Sometime ago I thought of creating an article about the person but I didn't know how to cancel the re-direction. Yesterday I saw an article in Dinamalar about A. T. Krishnaswamy written by Vamanan. There is enough information to create an article. But now I have no time to write articles. Just letting you know ... --UKSharma3 (User | talk | Contribs) 01:27, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- There is a way. I'll create the article, then let you edit it. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:30, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- uksharma3, Done. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:05, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. I will edit as time permits --UKSharma3 (User | talk | Contribs) 01:30, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments
Hi and I am so sorry for my usage of Tamil slangs in Tamil film articles. I apologise for my mistake and I promise you that I won't these mistakes again. I just created articles in a hurry as I will be temporarily unavailable on Wikipedia for about 9 months. So there won't be any problems regarding these issues and I will try to clear my mistakes on return. I wish you a Happy New Year 2019. Abishe (talk) 14:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Kailash29792!
Kailash29792,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
~~~~
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Abishe (talk) 14:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Happy New Year and Thank you!
The Teamwork Barnstar | ||
Happy New Year and thank you for your hard work getting The Flash drafts finally ready for inclusion in the mainspace! - Brojam (talk) 05:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC) |
- Thank you and wish you the same Brojam. The new year has begun in a good way. --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:47, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Happy new year
I wish you a happy new year and also a big thanks for your constant support you provide me in the form of thanking the edits of each article i edit. Srivin (talk) 12:48, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sathi Leelavathi (1936 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sathi Leelavathi (1936 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 06:40, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Ratsasan poster.
Hi, there ! Why is the Ratsasan poster which was currently uploaded by me and others are not able to be changed ? Sexymoosa123 (talk) 05:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Sexymoosa123, when there is a poster with the film's final release date, it is ideal to use that. This version uploaded by you does not have that, and is watermarked (which it shouldn't be per WP:WATERMARK). That is why I reverted your upload. --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
So can you upload and choose the new latest poster of the film which I had uploaded now lately. This is the latest poster for the film and it's not watermarked. Sexymoosa123 (talk) 05:18, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Sexymoosa123, alright I've used this. You happy now? It has the release date and no watermark. --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:24, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks a lot, bro ! Sexymoosa123 (talk) 11:59, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Poster
Dear Kailash29792! I found poster of Kickboxer: Retaliation [15] instead first look starring Jean claude Van Damme? Thank you and Happy New Year! --78.36.80.148 (talk)
Dear Kailasj29792! I foumd poster of movie Rajadhani (2011 film) instead fan poster [16], Rajadhani 2 it’s shelved sequel starring Puneeth Rajkumar and Haripirya, but they had collaboration only once. Thank you! —-89.110.28.130 (talk) 13:32, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- I have redirected Rajadhani 2. --Kailash29792 (talk) 14:43, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Nata Sarvabhouma (2019 film) [17], Black Water (2018 film) [18], Vadacurry [19] starring Sunny Leone instead first look? Thank you! —178.71.204.163 (talk) 08:25, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Sathi Leelavathi
Just the translations of the references I have highlighted are left. Just write them out and I can pass the article straight away. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 14:31, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ssven2, I have added the trans titles. Can you just suggest a way to paraphrase Pe. Ko. Sundararajan's quote since he didn't say it in English? Once it is done, you may pass it. --Kailash29792 (talk) 16:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "and the film was stuck in the second case." in his quote? Other than that, I feel you have it covered. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 17:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ssven2, this source has Sundararajan's quote, search from the line "மதுவினால் வரும் தீமைகள் பற்றிய" and suggest re-writes. --Kailash29792 (talk) 06:20, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- "Several new techniques introduced by Dungan were not understood by the audience and went unappreciated." — From what I gathered from the source you have mentioned here, you can say, "Several new filmmaking techniques introduced by Dungan were not properly understood by the audience and went unappreciated at the time." That will do. The rest I've made a minor change myself. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 09:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Done please see the changes and post the verdict on the GA review page. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- "Several new techniques introduced by Dungan were not understood by the audience and went unappreciated." — From what I gathered from the source you have mentioned here, you can say, "Several new filmmaking techniques introduced by Dungan were not properly understood by the audience and went unappreciated at the time." That will do. The rest I've made a minor change myself. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 09:19, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ssven2, this source has Sundararajan's quote, search from the line "மதுவினால் வரும் தீமைகள் பற்றிய" and suggest re-writes. --Kailash29792 (talk) 06:20, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "and the film was stuck in the second case." in his quote? Other than that, I feel you have it covered. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 17:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Unreleased Movie
Hi, Check the link and add information and movie poster in Kamal's unreleased movie page.
https://twitter.com/KHOurPride/status/1057210784378314752?s=20 Ajayrangaraj (talk) 13:14, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Sathi Leelavathi (1936 film)
The article Sathi Leelavathi (1936 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sathi Leelavathi (1936 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 06:41, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Danny's source
Never knew that Dhananjayan's source is fake because i used to keep his book as reference point for every article i used to edit including my first GA article Devadasu, please clarify regarding his source. And also Happy Pongal. Srivin (talk) 09:03, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Happy Pongal Srivin. Danny's books are not fake, they are just not acceptable for FA-level because he copied chunks of content from Wiki (see WP:MIRROR and WP:CIRCULAR). For GA, they are fine. I was shocked when Vensatry made this discovery, but what to do. I also discussed this with you over here --Kailash29792 (talk) 09:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Ah yes, I almost forgotten the discussion we had and now it makes complete sense. Srivin (talk) 10:03, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Arrow (season 4)
Hi. Just wanted to let you know that I have edited one of your recent edits to the above article in the 'Critical Response' section - as written it did not really reflect the tone of the source. I understand the desire to include some of the issues that have been brought up regarding the season, but these need to be reflected in the cited source. I have looked through the reviews I have found of the season, and find no real criticism of the 'Olicity' relationship in season four. It does seem more to have been a fan response, and there are plenty of blog-style 'articles' floating around that reflect this, but obviously, as they have no editorial oversight, they are not considered reliable sources. AutumnKing (talk) 18:45, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Poster
Dear Kailash29792! I found poster of movie Dongaata (2015 film) [20] instead poster which showed female protagonist with Ravi Teja, can you find posters of Natasaarvabhowma, Sher (film) starring Sonal Chauhan, Devadas (2018 film) and Aravinda Sametha Veera Raghava? Thank you! —-95.54.59.199 (talk) 09:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Oliver Queen (Arrowverse)
Hey, I'm wondering if you got any input on what we need to get Oliver Queen (Arrowverse) to at least a GA? Based on the lead (and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television#Character article structure), we need a "Concept and creation" section (the first paragraph). I'm also not sure about our Oliver Queen (Arrowverse)#Storyline section. Looking at Wikipedia:WikiProject Fictional characters/Quality content, I found Nikki and Paulo, a FA article, which lists the events chronologically, and not based on episode order with the flashbacks treated as flashbacks. Instead they treat the flashbacks as regular information. Ruby (Supernatural), a GA article, has just a Ruby (Supernatural)#Plot section without sub-headers for seasons. It would seem that based on these and others, it might be a better idea to present the character's plot according to the events - Island->Russia->Hong Kong->Island->Star City/Crossovers. I re-read what Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Television#Role in "SHOW NAME" says, and it doesn't say the events should be based on the episode order. I think maybe we need some more Critical response content as it seems that all of what is there is from the earlier seasons. What do you think? --Gonnym (talk) 16:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- I've never taken an article on a character to GA, so I don't know. Perhaps it is best to sort events according to chronology, and make sub-headings based on season numbers. You could ask Autumnking2012 for help. Kailash29792 (talk) 17:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll ask him, thanks! --Gonnym (talk) 19:25, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Vishwaroopam series
Hi, do you think Vishwaroopam series deserves a separate article like Singam series, Muni series and Bahubali series. Srivin (talk) 13:52, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- Actually, not until there is a third film or a spin-off series like Baahubali: The Lost Legends. --Kailash29792 (talk) 14:43, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
List of highest grossing Tamil films article
Is there any possibilities to restore List of highest-grossing Tamil films article now ?, I have already created the article with updated figures/films with limited sections like not including weekend collection section since its problematic. Cyphoidbomb said "need to establish a new community consensus". Thoughts? --Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 12:58, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- I'm not an admin, so I cannot say. But if the article is created, it will need indefinite protection from number-changing vandals. --Kailash29792 (talk) 13:03, 3 February 2019 (UTC)