Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Shepherd English School: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:10, 19 March 2016

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow Keep. All sec/high schls are keep per SO (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:10, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good Shepherd English School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a school with no indication of notability. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:25, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This school has been in the spotlights in India, see for example here. As off yet around one (negative) event. If more verifiable, independent sources are brought forward, I may reconsider my opinion. Based upon the information that I had in front of me, the school fails WP:N and WP:1E applies. The sole newsworthy event, BTW, is not mentioned in the very basic article. Otherwise I could find the school only in regular listings. gidonb (talk) 20:42, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 03:38, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 03:38, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

more than that it is one of the good cbse school in karaikal with strength of 1200 students.lots of educational ideas are made in the school. you can't tell a school worst by just watching a teacher's activity. she did it because all the class students had payed the annual day fees except this class students.it is the mistake of the teacher not the school's. kind request not to delete the article made by a student of that same school.talk —Preceding undated comment added 16:15, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And that is exactly why we have the one event rule! Otherwise we'd go dig up that one incident and it would be all over the article because that is all there is right now. Please wait until there is broader coverage of your school, probably this will take years, if it will happen at all, then you can create this article again (assuming it will now get deleted). We would still list the incident, but it wouldn't be the only independent, verifiable information. gidonb (talk) 16:24, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not being proposed for deletion because it isn't a "good school", but because it does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, Wiki tamil 100. Cordless Larry (talk) 16:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly! gidonb (talk) 16:27, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per the long-established consensus at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. I have also conducted a cleanup. AusLondonder (talk) 18:40, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for drawing our attention to this essay! For now I'm going to stick with the GNG, as it is an actual guideline. However, if more verifiable, independent sources will be found (not around that one event) I will change to keep. gidonb (talk) 23:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's called precedent and consensus. The "event" is irrelevant and not addressed in the article. AusLondonder (talk) 23:45, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a secondary school per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. VMS Mosaic (talk) 22:13, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:34, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
+:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).  No further edits should be made to this page.''
+<!--Template:Afd top
+Note:  If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]].  When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
+The result was '''Snow Keep'''. All sec/high schls are keep per SO <small>[[Wikipedia:NACD#Non-administrators_closing_discussions|(non-admin&nbsp;closure)]]</small> –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color: blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color: orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color: navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 01:10, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 ===[[Good Shepherd English School]]===
-{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|O}}
 :{{la|Good Shepherd English School}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Shepherd English School|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 March 12#{{anchorencode:Good Shepherd English School}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks">[https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Good_Shepherd_English_School Stats]</span>)
@@ Line 17: / Line 24: @@
 *'''Keep''' as a secondary school per [[WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES]]. [[User:VMS Mosaic|VMS Mosaic]] ([[User talk:VMS Mosaic|talk]]) 22:13, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- [[User:Necrothesp|Necrothesp]] ([[User talk:Necrothesp|talk]]) 14:34, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
+{{clear}}
+:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>