Talk:Tourette syndrome: Difference between revisions
TimVickers (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Wikipedical (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA}} |
{{GA}} |
||
{{fac}} |
|||
{{WPCD}} |
{{WPCD}} |
||
{{oldpeerreview}} |
{{oldpeerreview}} |
Revision as of 00:55, 1 September 2006
Tourette syndrome has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: No date specified. To provide a date use: {{GA|insert date in any format here}}. |
{{FAC}}
should be substituted at the top of the article talk page
Software: Computing Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
Tourette syndrome received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
- Archive01 (empty)
- Archive02 (21 Nov 2003 - 16 February 2006)
- Archive03 (16 February 2006 - 30 May 2006)
Semi-automated suggestions
The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question.
Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -
between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL.Please alphabetize the interlanguage links.This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view. For example,- correctly
might be weasel words, and should be provided with proper citations (if they already do, or are not weasel terms, pleasestrikethis comment).
- Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
Allpigs are pink, so we thought ofa number ofways to turn them green.”
- Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “
As is done in WP:FOOTNOTE, for footnotes, the footnote should be located right after the punctuation mark, such that there is no space inbetween. For example, change blah blah [2]. to blah blah.[2]- Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas. Thanks, Andy t 21:27, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- I’ve checked and corrected some of these things. However, my methods were semi-automated, too, so I cannot, in particular, guarantee the one about units of measurement. (I simply couldn’t find any.) I’m going to have to leave the rest to people who actually have a clue about the matter, though. —xyzzyn 22:18, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Eponymous DISEASES
Why add Tourette and Asperger's to a DISEASE category when people agree it is not a disease? Could we have some consistence, please? --Rdos 14:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- The point of the category is not that it is a "disease", rather that it's an eponym. I agree with your objection to the word "disease", but disagree with your methods, which amount to disrupting Wikipedia to make a point, when you've not attempted to correct the underlying problem. If it bothers you so much that the category is misnamed, you should go through the work of getting the category renamed to Eponymous conditions or Eponymous medical conditions. You can do that on Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. Put in the nomination, and I'll support it. Unless you're willing to do that work, please don't disrupt Wiki just to make a point. Sandy 14:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
- Never mind, I did the work myself. Added the articles to the Eponymous medical terms category. Sandy 14:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Size check
July 9th, 51 KB overall, 33 KB prose Sandy 05:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Image
http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/tourette/default.htm
Public domain? Can anyone help me figure out if there are copyright issues, and figure out how to load it up to Wiki ? Sandy 06:18, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell, the NCBDDD is part of the US government and the page, including the image, is work of the NCBDDD. Therefore you should be able to use the image here per WP:C.
- Download it to your computer and go to Special:Upload. Give the path to the file on your computer as the source and a name for the uploaded file on Wikipedia. (Beware: there’s a typo in the original filename, so if the javascript which automatically generates a destination name works, check what it does, anyway.) Put
{{Template:PD-USGov-HHS-CDC}}
and the URL of the page in the summary. Click on ‘Upload file’. That is all. —xyzzyn 07:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Pardon?
You know, I've read the page for Tourette's syndrome and I'm still none the wiser. Perhaps someone who knows the subject well could explain (in English) exactly what a Tourette's syndrome sufferer suffers from. Many thanks.
Indeed
Why not a label for Tourette syndrom Wikipedians? Im sure there are more than a few "Shackey Jakes" out there who can explain whats up.
GA pass
I went through this and made some changes. I removed the sentence "Probabilistic models may yield better results in finding the cause, as the autosomal dominant inheritance model has not been validated." since even as a biochemist I'm unclear as to what this means. Otherwise, an excellent and thorough article. TimVickers 20:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Undated GA templates
- Good articles without topic parameter
- Unassessed software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Unassessed software articles of Unknown-importance
- Unassessed Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- Old requests for peer review