Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence/archive1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:18, 13 August 2016

List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence

Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Jennifer Lawrence/archive1

Nominator(s): Krish | Talk 18:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because Jennifer Lawrence, as we all know, need no introduction. She has achived both critical acclaim and commercial success, and that too in such a short span of time. Coming to the list, which provides the information about the awards and nominations she has received, I feel meets the FL criteria. Looking forward to lots of feedback on this. Krish | Talk 18:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I guess I'll take the first bite at this list. I figured I'd take a look at this list since I managed to promote Bradley Cooper's awards list to FL status not too long ago. I'll take a closer look tonight, but just something I noticed right of the bat. Recently, this was a thing, and I had to reword the opening line of the Bradley Cooper list to not include the number of awards and nominations. You should definitely look at it. Famous Hobo (talk) 23:52, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, my previous commitment took much longer than I expected, and I'm kind of tired. But I still did a cursory look through the lead, and so far so good. One thing that can be easily fixed is "her portrayal of Raven Darkhölme / Mystique". Personally, I think you can leave it as Mystique, as most superheroes in superhero movies just go by their superhero name instead of their real names (Captain American, Wolverine, etc.) There is also another mention of Raven Darkhölme / Mystique in the last paragraph. Famous Hobo (talk) 05:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed: Famous Hobo Thanks for looking at the list. I really appreciate it. Krish | Talk 17:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are WP:OVERLINK issues in the lead (People and Teen Choice Awards, Golden Globe). – jona ✉ 23:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@AJona1992: Corrected the overlink. Sorry for being so late, was/am super busy.Krish | Talk 16:59, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from SNUGGUMS

"notably at"..... including would be more neutral
"Her performance in the comedy-drama Silver Linings Playbook, she won"..... missing a "For" at the beginning
"2013-15" → "2013–15" per WP:DASH
"she received several awards and nominations for her performances in the other three films in The Hunger Games series"..... "series" shouldn't be italicized, and let's give specific examples of what she won (i.e. Best Female Performance for Catching Fire)
I'm so sure if Daily Express is a reliable source to use, but this definitely isn't either way
Ref#139 is malformatted since accessdate parameter needs to be separated from "Chicago Film Critics Association"

Needs some adjustments, but not too far off Snuggums (talk / edits) 02:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS: Done. However, couldn't do the references (will do it soon).Krish | Talk 02:33, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking better, but I just noticed now that one of the Oscar links is dead Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:03, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. @SNUGGUMS:, regarding your concerns towards above refrences, I would like to add that both Metro and Daily Express are widely used on Wikipedia (just came to know about their wiki articles).Krish | Talk 07:10, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't necessarily mean they're good to use, though. While Daily Express might be a fine source to use, Mirror (what I linked to) and Metro are certainly not as they're known to often give dubious reports. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:19, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@SNUGGUMS: Replaced the Metro source with one from The Hollywood Reporter. I hope rest is fine. Thanks for your inputs.Krish | Talk 07:52, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I now support since I don't see any glaring issues. Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:04, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Can't see any visible issue. Yashthepunisher (talk) 08:56, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appears to be satisfactory and meet the criteria.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source review: Formatting looks OK, spot checks show the information is present in the sources, and no copyvios. The only other thing I'd add, which isn't an FLC requirement, is that it may be useful to archive the weblinks in the references to avoid link rot. (See User:SchroCat/Web archiving for instructions on the basic process, if you wish).

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. - SchroCat (talk) 07:18, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 *'''Support''' Can't see any visible issue. [[User:Yashthepunisher|Yashthepunisher]] ([[User talk:Yashthepunisher|talk]]) 08:56, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 *'''Support''' Appears to be satisfactory and meet the criteria.♦ [[User:Dr. Blofeld|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#aba67e">''Dr. Blofeld''</span>]] 13:45, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
+;Source review: Formatting looks OK, spot checks show the information is present in the sources, and no copyvios. The only other thing I'd add, which isn't an FLC requirement, is that it may be useful to archive the weblinks in the references to avoid link rot. (See [[User:SchroCat/Web archiving]] for instructions on the basic process, if you wish).
+{{FLCClosed|promoted}} - [[User:SchroCat|SchroCat]] ([[User talk:SchroCat|talk]]) 07:18, 13 August 2016 (UTC)