User talk:Kojakkrags

Kojakkrags, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kojakkrags! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

pashtun people

1.why are you replacing afghanistan with durrani empire...durrani empire no longer exist but afghanistan still does. Im adding people on modern day achievements....not something that is history. and durrani empire was not the only powerful pashtun empire 2. yes there are many notable pashtuns from pakistan like imran khan. Saadkhan12345 (talk) 23:18, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

I gave a valid reason...it is common knowledge that the Durrani Empire was a very powerful Pashtun empire, it covered both Afghanistan and what is now Pakistan. Name another Pashtun empire that was more powerful than the Durrani empire. Then why are you removing today's popular world leaders (Hamid Karzai and Ashraf Ghani)? Pakistan's current government has no notable Pashtuns. Imran Khan's ethnicity is questionable, just because he has a Khan last name doesn't make him Pashtun. There has to be a source that explicitly states he is Pashtun, just like Karzai and Ghani. Kojakkrags (talk) 16:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

I asked why are you adding historical achievements in lead section? there are more afghan pashtun kings but the reason why ahmed shah durani is written is because hes done something that still visible today. Imran khan is pashtun. if you click on his page you see it all well sourced and referenced.

Your English is weak, I can't understand what you're saying. Pakistan was created in 1947 but Pashtuns existed for 100s of years (as Afghans). This article is about them. The lead suppose to mention notable Pashtuns, regardless if they existed 100s of years ago. The whole world knows that Imran Khan is not really a Pashtun. You have to show convincing evidence to the contrary. Is there evidence that he speaks Pashto or his father being Pashtun? There is nothing in the entire internet. Kojakkrags (talk) 14:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

i didnt say that the lead should not have pashtuns. you said there nothing in the entire internet but if you CLICK ON HIS PAGE you will see it.

Check here Family of Imran KhanSaadkhan12345 (talk) 03:42, 27 May 201

Everything on the internet says he, his parents, grandparents, and even great-grand parents, are Punjabis. The whole world knows he is not Pashtun but a Punjabi. Anyway, why you keep arguing over this? I didn't remove his name or picture. Kojakkrags (talk) 04:14, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Omg can you not read? read what the reference words says"The family are ethnically of Pashtun origin. Paternally, Khan belongs to the Niazi Pashtun tribe which has long been settled in Mianwali in northwestern Punjab.[2] Khan's mother hailed from the Burki Pashtun tribe settled in Jalandhar (Punjab), which had emigrated a few centuries ago from South Waziristan in the tribal areas of northwest Pakistan. Saadkhan12345 (talk) 10:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Are you Imran Khan? I asked this because you are extremely defensive. I read everything, no source mention him being Pashtun. There is only an old picture of him sitting with tribale people, that means nothing. Everybody knows there are NON-Pashtuns in the tribal areas. Kojakkrags (talk) 16:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

• Comment Note that Wikipedia articles are not reliable sources and should not be used as evidence for anything. So you can't use Family of Imran Khan as support Imran Khan's ethnicity. However, neither is "the whole world knows" a valid argument. You must find reliable independent sources (which also excludes books written by Imran Khan) for any claim that is contested. --regentspark (comment) 20:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administratonrs may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.--regentspark (comment) 11:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Kojakkrags (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This block is unjustified. I didn't violate Wikipedia. Am I blocked because of my possible race, nationality, ethnicity, or religion? To block civilized editors based on these grounds is the most evil thing in Wikipedia. There are two people in my house who edit Wikipedia articles, both are very mature and would not violate Wikipedia. We had no idea that two people cannot create Wikipedia account. I didn't even get a warning.Kojakkrags (talk) 15:27, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This block is unjustified. I didn't violate Wikipedia. Am I blocked because of my possible race, nationality, ethnicity, or religion? To block civilized editors based on these grounds is the most evil thing in Wikipedia. There are two people in my house who edit Wikipedia articles, both are very mature and would not violate Wikipedia. We had no idea that two people cannot create Wikipedia account. I didn't even get a warning.[[User:Kojakkrags|Kojakkrags]] ([[User talk:Kojakkrags#top|talk]]) 15:27, 3 June 2017 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This block is unjustified. I didn't violate Wikipedia. Am I blocked because of my possible race, nationality, ethnicity, or religion? To block civilized editors based on these grounds is the most evil thing in Wikipedia. There are two people in my house who edit Wikipedia articles, both are very mature and would not violate Wikipedia. We had no idea that two people cannot create Wikipedia account. I didn't even get a warning.[[User:Kojakkrags|Kojakkrags]] ([[User talk:Kojakkrags#top|talk]]) 15:27, 3 June 2017 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This block is unjustified. I didn't violate Wikipedia. Am I blocked because of my possible race, nationality, ethnicity, or religion? To block civilized editors based on these grounds is the most evil thing in Wikipedia. There are two people in my house who edit Wikipedia articles, both are very mature and would not violate Wikipedia. We had no idea that two people cannot create Wikipedia account. I didn't even get a warning.[[User:Kojakkrags|Kojakkrags]] ([[User talk:Kojakkrags#top|talk]]) 15:27, 3 June 2017 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}