User talk:(aeropagitica): Difference between revisions

; Archives
	November 2004 – March 2006; March – April 2006; April – May 2006; May – June 2006; June 1 - 10 2006; June 11 - 28 2006; June 28 - July 13 2006; July 14 - July 23 2006; July 23 - August 10 2006; August 10 - August 23 2006; August 23 - August 29 2006; August 30 - September 8 2006; September 8 - September 24 2006; September 25 - October 10 2006; October 10 - October 23 2006; October 23 - October 30 2006; October 30 - November 7 2006; ;

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:53, 11 November 2006

This is the talk page for (aeropagitica)

Please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A Descriptive Header==. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions.

Please add new discussions at the bottom of the page.

RfA thanks

Hi (aeropagitica), and thanks for your ISTJ participation at the recent RfA, which did not succeed. For those of you who expressed their support, your kind words and your trust are sincerely appreciated. For those who were opposed --especially those who offered their constructive criticism-- please accept this message as assurance that equally sincere efforts, aimed at enhancing the quality and accuracy of representations within the Wikipedia, will continue. Striving for improved collaboration and consensus will also continue, with all of your insights in mind, while applying NPOV ideals as fairly and reasonably as possible. Ombudsman 04:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi Aero, thanks a lot for your support to my RFA. Wow, thats a lot of edits you have!! Hope to be able to match upto you someday:) -- Lost^(talk) 11:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and I just noticed, like me, you are Lost too ;) -- Lost^(talk) 18:13, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Permissions

Is there a way in which I can just get permission to delete all of the stupid and dumb articles that appear on Special:Newpages? Diez2 00:01, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In order to delete articles, you have to have Administrator privileges on Wikipedia. You can read about the role of administrators at Wikipedia:Administrators. If you want to become an admin then I suggest making helpful edits in the Wiki, polocy, article and Userspaces for at least six months in order to build up knowledge of policies and guidelines and a good reputation amongst your peers. If you want to nominate articles for deletion, take a look at the speedy deletion criteria and use the templates to tag the pages for the attention of administrators such as me. Don't forget that you have been adopted by Rat235478683, so you are free to ask them questions about Wikipedia as well! (aeropagitica) 00:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Passing comment

Re: User: Aughhheadshot, what a strange one that was. I'm going to keep the comments he left on my talk page as a keepsake. If I was to imagine some kind of "comic strip" vandal - that would be it! Bubba hot ep 16:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock

I am Bobabobabo, i am using my home computer. To tell you the truth, I was a wonderful contributor to articles in Wikipedia "Yu-Gi-OH and Pokemon". The story began when a user named Mitsumasa began creating and upload Pokemon images and articles.

After about 5 months after the start of the articles the PCP began merging the articles (A Man In Black, Ryulong, Interrobamf) i tried talking to them, and the PCP but they did'nt listen. I even tried to leave a committ on their usertalk pages but A Man in Black is the only one that responds to my committ. I gave up until recently students at my school "The Learning Community School" began bullying me, they knew that I was a contributor at the site "Wikipedia", so they told my teacher that they logged in some accounts and began vandalizing the articles that I personattly was currently having problems with you. My teacher Mrs. Lisa Mercato talked to the students Jene', Jessica, Aaron and restricted them from using the school computer.

I'm very sorry. May you please unblock me and my IP address 72.177.68.38. May you please just make it that I can create a new account. It is a total misunderstanding. If you want to talk to my teacher, please email her at lmercato@yahoo.com. The block is casuing the school not to edit Wikipedia. Thank you, and God Bless. (18:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Yukiudaigx now added to Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Bobabobabo. (aeropagitica) 18:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protect function

Hi. I'm not an admin but I was wondering if this would still allow me to semi-protect certain pages that have been vandalised quite often within the past few days. If not, how could I go about having this assigned to articles? Wikiwoohoo 20:01, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Take your business case for semi-protection to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. It will be assessed and granted/refused after a discussion. (aeropagitica) 20:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help :). Wikiwoohoo 20:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

www.stateuniversity.com

I don't know how to do this, but I thought you might: This site posted links in wikipedia for many of the pages listed on their site. Over 100 schools on their site and they are continuing to add more. 59.145.233.130, 59.95.66.173, 59.95.70.60, 74.134.246.13, 59.95.70.84, 59.145.233.130, 58.68.79.5 These are just a few of the IP's involved. It currently has 68 insertions in Wikipedia.

Also, this site is also connected with these others, many of which were added along with stateuniversity.com: www.encyclopedia.jrank.org www.madehow.com www.referenceforbusiness.com www.nationsencyclopedia.com www.everyculture.com

They keep switching ip's to break the pattern. Any help/advice would definitely be appreciated.

Stealthound 21:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Take this case to either the administrators' noticeboard or the administrators' noticeboard for incidents for action. (aeropagitica) 22:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Hello (aeropagitica), Very thanks for supporting my RfA and for comments on it. I would try to use new tools in the best possible way. I am very thankful to you for showing confidence in me. If I found any difficulty in handling the tools, I would ask for the solution. Thanks for congratulations :) Shyam ^(T/C) 05:57, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks!

My brand-spankin' new mop!

My RfA done
I hope to wield my mop well
(Her name is Vera)

I appreciate
The support you have shown me
(I hope I don't suck)

Anyway, I just
wanted to drop you a line
(damn, haikus are hard)

EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blatant Vandal Warning

I appreciate your concern for vandalism on Wikipedia, but I think you should know that the revisions indicate that I was fixing the vandalism that had occurred before I visited the page, and I did not add anything to the entry. Thanks. 68.100.59.189 20:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you for the extra feathers on my wings!

Thank you so much, (aeropagitica), for your support in my RfA, which passed on November 11, 2006, with a final tally of 82/0/2. I am humbled by the kind support of so many fellow Wikipedians, and I vow to continue to work and improve with the help of these new tools. Should you have any request, do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Húsönd 20:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also thank you for congratulating me. :-) Regards.--Húsönd 20:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block

It has indeed become apparent that the person editing under 86.86.242.88 is intentionally vandalising, but please change the block to a temporary one. It's an IP address, and you could be permanently preventing more than one person from editing. --Gray Porpoise^{cetaceans have large brains} 22:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is a softblock, so accounts can be registered by editors if they want to contribute constructively. I can reduce the block, though. (aeropagitica) 22:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley-Wilf conjecture

Sorry, the recreation was mine, not User:Sr13. It is my belief that small articles are better than red links, as anonymous can expand stubs but can't create articles. However, I understand your position, and thus I am sorry for having recreated the article. -- ReyBrujo 22:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 142: / Line 142: @@
 :It is a softblock, so accounts can be registered by editors if they want to contribute constructively.  I can reduce the block, though. [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 22:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
+== Stanley-Wilf conjecture ==
+Sorry, the recreation was mine, not [[User:Sr13]]. It is my belief that small articles are better than red links, as anonymous can expand stubs but can't create articles. However, I understand your position, and thus I am sorry for having recreated the article. -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 22:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)