Wikipedia talk:Article wizard: Difference between revisions
→Rolling tube stock: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Alex Noble (talk | contribs) →Rolling tube stock: Replying to Hirdy123 (using reply-link) |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Which is your least liked tube stock? [[User:Hirdy123|Hirdy123]] ([[User talk:Hirdy123|talk]]) 13:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC) |
Which is your least liked tube stock? [[User:Hirdy123|Hirdy123]] ([[User talk:Hirdy123|talk]]) 13:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
:{{u|Hirdy123}}, Please read [[WP:NOTFORUM]]. This isn't really the correct website for this sort of stuff. |
|||
: |
|||
:The answer is of course the [[1992 stock]]. <span style="color: darkgreen"> ~~ </span> [[User:OxonAlex|<span style="color: darkgreen"><small>Oxon</small>Alex</span>]] [[User talk:OxonAlex|<span style="color: darkgreen">- talk</span>]] 13:16, 26 December 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:16, 26 December 2019
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Article wizard page. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 25 days  |
 | Are you in the right place or not?
|
 | To help centralise discussions and keep related topics together, all wizard talk pages redirect here. |
 | Articles for creation Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Article wizard page. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 25 days |
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of Wikipedia:Article wizard
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
| This page is for discussion of the Article Wizard only. DO NOT ADD ANY OTHER MESSAGES HERE |
Redundant text
The two sections about copyright are redundant:
- "Your article will be rejected if... uses copyrighted material copy-pasted from a source."
- "Do not copy-paste material from sources. This constitutes copyright infringement, and is not allowed."
How about: "Your article will be rejected if the topic is not notable, is referenced improperly, or it uses copyrighted material copied from another source." and we delete the second redundant part about copyright. Note that I also fixed the grammar and changed "copy-pasted" to "copied" since "copied" is more easily understood and it's still a copyvio even if they copy it by manual transcription rather than pasting. Also, can we please, please try to not expand the instructions further. Every system we build for guiding people through article creation seems to inevitably evolve into a wall of text that no one reads. Kaldari (talk) 04:16, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Okay Bundleofgreens (talk) 11:16, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Template-protected edit request on 26 November 2019
 | This edit request to Wikipedia:Article wizard/Content has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Protected pages should never be inaccessible from view of anyone, since the problem is in allowing unrestricted access to editing capabilities, but those protected pages could contain content that is unfounded, biased, or logically convoluted to the content displayed in any other page under the domain of the rule. That rule goes against what Wikipedia is, which is a site where incorrect information can be refined by anyone who has the ability to refine it, however editing restrictions should at least be viewable to those who use Wikipedia. 107.77.165.40 (talk) 12:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 12:58, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Kkv
Could you please allow me to post a article on this topic which is subject oriented Aishwarya18 (talk) 05:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- You are welcome to start a draft using the Article wizard. More information about writing articles can be found at WP:YFA. Primefac (talk) 11:21, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Rolling tube stock
Which is your least liked tube stock? Hirdy123 (talk) 13:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hirdy123, Please read WP:NOTFORUM. This isn't really the correct website for this sort of stuff.
- The answer is of course the 1992 stock. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 13:16, 26 December 2019 (UTC)