Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The three wise monkeys in popular culture: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →[[The three wise monkeys in popular culture]]: Credit where credit's due? |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*'''Delete''' non-sourced, a grab-bag for every trivial mention. Delete this before God destroys 40 days and nights of rain again. [[User:MarkBul|MarkBul]] 05:47, 6 September 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' non-sourced, a grab-bag for every trivial mention. Delete this before God destroys 40 days and nights of rain again. [[User:MarkBul|MarkBul]] 05:47, 6 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per nominator. [[User:JIP|<font color="#CC0000">J</font><font color="#00CC00">I</font><font color="#0000CC">P</font>]] | [[User talk:JIP|Talk]] 05:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per nominator. [[User:JIP|<font color="#CC0000">J</font><font color="#00CC00">I</font><font color="#0000CC">P</font>]] | [[User talk:JIP|Talk]] 05:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - nomination appears poorly considered. In what way is the article "cluttered"? it seems neatly structured to me. As for "unsourced", the media mentioned in the list are sufficiently accessible sources. "Trivial", yes; but the point of creating the article was to stop the article [[Three wise monkeys]] being overwhelmed by these items. - [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] [[User_talk:Fayenatic_london|(talk)]] 07:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' (as creator) - nomination appears poorly considered. In what way is the article "cluttered"? it seems neatly structured to me. As for "unsourced", the media mentioned in the list are sufficiently accessible sources. "Trivial", yes; but the point of creating the article was to stop the article [[Three wise monkeys]] being overwhelmed by these items. - [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] [[User_talk:Fayenatic_london|(talk)]] 07:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
:*''the point of creating the article was to stop the article [[Three wise monkeys]] being overwhelmed by these items'' - that much is obvious, but the question is whether a subject like this deserves to exist on its own merits. "Stopping article x being overwhelmed by trivia" is not a good reason to create a new article, the proper solution IMO is simply to trim the amount of trivia so that it ''doesn't'' overwhelm the original article. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] 07:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC) |
:*''the point of creating the article was to stop the article [[Three wise monkeys]] being overwhelmed by these items'' - that much is obvious, but the question is whether a subject like this deserves to exist on its own merits. "Stopping article x being overwhelmed by trivia" is not a good reason to create a new article, the proper solution IMO is simply to trim the amount of trivia so that it ''doesn't'' overwhelm the original article. [[User:Gatoclass|Gatoclass]] 07:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Speedy delete''' The page has one [[WTF]] image on it of [[Faye Wong]] doing the "hear no evil..." thing - the above user (who created the page) is named after this Chinese musician and is a big fan, see userpage[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fayenatic_london] - this is nothing but an obvious (yet oh so clever, I must give you that) fanpage.--[[User:Old Hoss|Old Hoss]] 07:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC) |
*'''Speedy delete''' The page has one [[WTF]] image on it of [[Faye Wong]] doing the "hear no evil..." thing - the above user (who created the page) is named after this Chinese musician and is a big fan, see userpage[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fayenatic_london] - this is nothing but an obvious (yet oh so clever, I must give you that) fanpage.--[[User:Old Hoss|Old Hoss]] 07:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
*: At least that's giving credit where credit's due! Actually, the mention of Faye Wong was only added recently, but I created the article months ago as part of the long-proposed merger of [[Three wise monkeys]] with [[See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil|See no evil...]]. Oh OK, you got me, I had in mind to add it eventually. - [[User:Fayenatic london|Fayenatic]] [[User_talk:Fayenatic_london|(talk)]] 09:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:06, 6 September 2007
The three wise monkeys in popular culture
- The three wise monkeys in popular culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Yet another cluttered, trivial and unsourced list. RobJ1981 04:18, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I've seen some in pop culture articles which should be kept. Then I've seen ones like this. The article is useless - you may as well create a list of cultural depictions of "D'oh". Unsourced and has OR issues. Delete. Spawn Man 05:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - non notable. Gatoclass 05:40, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete non-sourced, a grab-bag for every trivial mention. Delete this before God destroys 40 days and nights of rain again. MarkBul 05:47, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. JIP | Talk 05:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep (as creator) - nomination appears poorly considered. In what way is the article "cluttered"? it seems neatly structured to me. As for "unsourced", the media mentioned in the list are sufficiently accessible sources. "Trivial", yes; but the point of creating the article was to stop the article Three wise monkeys being overwhelmed by these items. - Fayenatic (talk) 07:17, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- the point of creating the article was to stop the article Three wise monkeys being overwhelmed by these items - that much is obvious, but the question is whether a subject like this deserves to exist on its own merits. "Stopping article x being overwhelmed by trivia" is not a good reason to create a new article, the proper solution IMO is simply to trim the amount of trivia so that it doesn't overwhelm the original article. Gatoclass 07:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete The page has one WTF image on it of Faye Wong doing the "hear no evil..." thing - the above user (who created the page) is named after this Chinese musician and is a big fan, see userpage[1] - this is nothing but an obvious (yet oh so clever, I must give you that) fanpage.--Old Hoss 07:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- At least that's giving credit where credit's due! Actually, the mention of Faye Wong was only added recently, but I created the article months ago as part of the long-proposed merger of Three wise monkeys with See no evil.... Oh OK, you got me, I had in mind to add it eventually. - Fayenatic (talk) 09:06, 6 September 2007 (UTC)