Jump to content

Insight on the News: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎'Anonymous smear' controversy in 2008 Presidential Campaign: this paragraph seems to be about Insight, not other media
→‎'Anonymous smear' controversy in 2008 Presidential Campaign: it was mainly Fox who "picked up" the story
Line 61: Line 61:
On January 17, 2007, ''Insight'' published what would quickly come to be known among journalists and media experts as "the first anonymous smear" of the [[2008 U.S. presidential election]] campaign, and as a "double smear" on two of its candidates. The first sentence of the report asked the [[loaded question]] of whether the "American people were ready" for a candidate who was "educated in a Madrassa as a young boy and has not been forthcoming about his Muslim heritage?" The second sentence alleged "This is the question Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s camp is asking about Sen. Barack Obama." No basis was found for ''Insight'''s question and allegation, and throughout the ensuing controversy ''Insight'' steadfastly refused to present evidence or qualify it's sources.<ref name='Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg'> {{cite journal|title=The Fallacy of Many Questions: On the Notions of Complexity, Loadedness and Unfair Entrapment in Interrogative Theory|journal=The Journal Argumentation|date=November 1999|first=Douglas|last=Walton|coauthors=|volume=13|issue=4|pages=379-383|id= {{doi|10.1023/A:1007727929716}}|url=http://www.springerlink.com/content/p2664751t4130844/|format=|accessdate=2008-02-11 }}</ref><ref>[http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/Obama_1.htm Hillary's team has questions about Obama's Muslim background] ''Insight'' January 11, 2007.</ref>.
On January 17, 2007, ''Insight'' published what would quickly come to be known among journalists and media experts as "the first anonymous smear" of the [[2008 U.S. presidential election]] campaign, and as a "double smear" on two of its candidates. The first sentence of the report asked the [[loaded question]] of whether the "American people were ready" for a candidate who was "educated in a Madrassa as a young boy and has not been forthcoming about his Muslim heritage?" The second sentence alleged "This is the question Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s camp is asking about Sen. Barack Obama." No basis was found for ''Insight'''s question and allegation, and throughout the ensuing controversy ''Insight'' steadfastly refused to present evidence or qualify it's sources.<ref name='Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg'> {{cite journal|title=The Fallacy of Many Questions: On the Notions of Complexity, Loadedness and Unfair Entrapment in Interrogative Theory|journal=The Journal Argumentation|date=November 1999|first=Douglas|last=Walton|coauthors=|volume=13|issue=4|pages=379-383|id= {{doi|10.1023/A:1007727929716}}|url=http://www.springerlink.com/content/p2664751t4130844/|format=|accessdate=2008-02-11 }}</ref><ref>[http://www.insightmag.com/Media/MediaManager/Obama_1.htm Hillary's team has questions about Obama's Muslim background] ''Insight'' January 11, 2007.</ref>.


''Insight''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s report falsely characterized [[State Elementary School Menteng 01]], an Indonesian public school which Obama attended as a child, as an Islamic [[Madrasah#Negative_connotations_applied_to_the_word|"madrassa"]]. Although the Arabic word ''"madrassa"'' refers to any kind of school, in post 9/11 United States political contexts it is primarily used to imply an association with anti-American extremism.<ref name=YG20070621>{{cite web |first=Susan |last=Moeller
''Insight''<nowiki>'</nowiki>s report falsely labeled [[State Elementary School Menteng 01]], an Indonesian public school which Obama attended as a child, as an Islamic [[Madrasah#Negative_connotations_applied_to_the_word|"madrassa"]]. Although the Arabic word ''"madrassa"'' refers to any kind of school, in post 9/11 United States political contexts it is primarily used to imply an association with anti-American extremism.<ref name=YG20070621>{{cite web |first=Susan |last=Moeller
|title=Jumping on the US Bandwagon for a "War on Terror" |date=2007-06-21 |url=http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=9324
|title=Jumping on the US Bandwagon for a "War on Terror" |date=2007-06-21 |url=http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=9324
|work=Yale Global Online |publisher=Yale Center for the Study of Globalization}}</ref>
|work=Yale Global Online |publisher=Yale Center for the Study of Globalization}}</ref>
Line 79: Line 79:
| accessdate = 2007-01-26}}</ref> Interviews by the [[Associated Press]] found that students of all faiths have been welcome there since before Obama's attendance.<ref>{{cite news |title=Obama challenges allegation about Islamic school |first=Nedra |last=Pickler |url=http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20070124-1317-obama-2008.html |work=San Diego Union-Tribune |date=2007-01-24 |accessdate=2008-02-10}}</ref>
| accessdate = 2007-01-26}}</ref> Interviews by the [[Associated Press]] found that students of all faiths have been welcome there since before Obama's attendance.<ref>{{cite news |title=Obama challenges allegation about Islamic school |first=Nedra |last=Pickler |url=http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20070124-1317-obama-2008.html |work=San Diego Union-Tribune |date=2007-01-24 |accessdate=2008-02-10}}</ref>


After being picked up by television news networks, ''Insight'''s story was quickly debunked by news organizations and widely villified by journalists, including the ''[[Columbia Journalism Review]]''. The article was immediately denounced by Senator Obama and described as "an obvious right-wing hit job on both candidates" by a spokesperson for Senator Clinton. Journalists condemned the ''Insight'' report as an anonymous "double smear" for its impact on both candidates.
After being mentioned by [[Fox News]], ''Insight'''s story was quickly debunked by other news organizations and widely villified by journalists, including the ''[[Columbia Journalism Review]]''. The article was immediately denounced by Senator Obama and described as "an obvious right-wing hit job on both candidates" by a spokesperson for Senator Clinton. Journalists condemned the ''Insight'' report as an anonymous "double smear" for its impact on both candidates.


A critical [[January 29]] story in ''The New York Times'' said of ''Insight'' editor [[Jeffrey T. Kuhner]] that Kuhner still considered the article to be "solid as solid can be." Kuhner, however, declined to say whether even he himself knew the identity of his unnamed reporter’s sources. The ''Times'' commented "perhaps only that reporter knows the origin of the article’s anonymous quotes and assertions. Its assertions about Mr. Obama resemble rumors passed on without evidence in e-mail messages..."<ref name="feed">{{
A critical [[January 29]] story in ''The New York Times'' said of ''Insight'' editor [[Jeffrey T. Kuhner]] that Kuhner still considered the article to be "solid as solid can be." Kuhner, however, declined to say whether even he himself knew the identity of his unnamed reporter’s sources. The ''Times'' commented "perhaps only that reporter knows the origin of the article’s anonymous quotes and assertions. Its assertions about Mr. Obama resemble rumors passed on without evidence in e-mail messages..."<ref name="feed">{{

Revision as of 13:29, 13 February 2008

Insight
File:Insight on the News magazine logo.gif
Typeweekly
online magazine
Formatmagazine
Owner(s)News World Communications and the Unification Church
EditorJeffrey T. Kuhner
Founded1980s
Political alignmentconservative
Headquarters3600 New York Avenue NE
Washington DC 20002
Websiteinsightmag.com

Insight (formerly Insight on the News) is an American conservative Internet magazine now edited by Jeffrey T. Kuhner and owned by News World Communications, identified by Columbia Journalism Review as "the media arm of the Rev. Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church",[1] which also owns United Press International and The Washington Times.

Background

Insight was founded in the 1980s as a print weekly called Insight on the News, and was known for its frequently discredited reports about alleged scandals in the administration of U.S. President Bill Clinton.[citation needed] Originally, the magazine circulated midway in frequency between sister publications The Washington Times (a daily newspaper) and the monthly World&I magazine. Investigative journalist Robert Parry wrote about the rise of these publications:

"By the 1980s, the likes of South Korean theocrat Rev. Sun Myung Moon and Australian media mogul Rupert Murdoch were pouring billions of dollars into a rapidly expanding right-wing media. From these investments came a plethora of well-financed think tanks, year-round attack groups, and a vertically integrated conservative news media – from books, magazines and newspapers to radio, TV and eventually the Internet. Right-wing activists flocked to Washington and New York for good-paying jobs as journalists and pundits."[2]

In 2004, News World Communications discontinued publication of the print magazine and hired Jeffrey T. Kuhner to run Insight as a stand-alone website. Under Kuhner, Insight eschews bylines, in what Kuhner describes as an effort to "encourage contributions from reporters who do not want to reveal their names". About Insight's policy, Kuhner has said:[3][4]

“Reporters in Washington know a whole lot of what is going on and feel themselves shackled and prevented from reporting what they know is going on. Insight is almost like an outlet, an escape valve where they can come out with this information.”

Notable events

David Brock

David Brock worked as a reporter for the print version of Insight during the late 1980s. After leaving Insight, Brock wrote "Blinded by the Right: Conscience of an Ex-Conservative", and now runs Media Matters for America, an organization that describes itself as "a web-based, not-for-profit, progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media."[5][6]

Arlington National Cemetery

In 1997 Insight reported that the administration of President Bill Clinton gave political donors rights to be buried in Arlington National Cemetery. This charge was widely repeated on talk radio and other conservative outlets; but was later denied by the United States Army, which has charge over Arlington Cemetery.

Spurred on by the report, a subsequent flurry of media investigations turned up the burial of Larry Lawrence, a former United States Ambassador to Switzerland at Arlington, which in turn sparked a congressional investigation. Republican Party members of congress searched military records and found no evidence that Lawrence was ever in the Merchant Marine. As a result Lawrence's body was disinterred in 1997 at taxpayer expense and brought to California. Richard Holbrooke, an assistant secretary of state, had helped attain the rights to bury Lawrence at Arlington, and had written a letter to the White House praising Lawrence and saying that he deserved burial at the National Cemetery.[7][8][9][10]

Paula Jones

In 1998 CNN reported that Insight "created a stir" when Paula Jones, who had filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against President Clinton, was the magazine's guest at the annual White House Correspondents Association dinner where Clinton spoke.[11]

CIA leak scandal

On February 5, 2004, Insight teamed up with News World's sister company United Press International to publish the first anonymously sourced reports from "Federal Law Enforcement officials" of "hard evidence" against Vice President Dick Cheney's staffers John Hannah and Lewis "Scooter" Libby as the guilty parties in "Plamegate". Hannah subsequently testified, and Libby was convicted. Questions about who the "Federal Law Enforcement officials" were, and what "hard evidence" might have existed at the time of the scoop have fueled wide speculation that Libby was chosen as a "fall guy" [12] to take the rap for higher-ups in the Bush Administration, with speculation focused primarily on Cheney.[citation needed] Some journalists and bloggers commented that if a media outlet were needed to set up Libby for the fall, Insight would have been a logical first choice.[13][14]

'Anonymous smear' controversy in 2008 Presidential Campaign

On January 17, 2007, Insight published what would quickly come to be known among journalists and media experts as "the first anonymous smear" of the 2008 U.S. presidential election campaign, and as a "double smear" on two of its candidates. The first sentence of the report asked the loaded question of whether the "American people were ready" for a candidate who was "educated in a Madrassa as a young boy and has not been forthcoming about his Muslim heritage?" The second sentence alleged "This is the question Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s camp is asking about Sen. Barack Obama." No basis was found for Insight's question and allegation, and throughout the ensuing controversy Insight steadfastly refused to present evidence or qualify it's sources.[15][16].

Insight's report falsely labeled State Elementary School Menteng 01, an Indonesian public school which Obama attended as a child, as an Islamic "madrassa". Although the Arabic word "madrassa" refers to any kind of school, in post 9/11 United States political contexts it is primarily used to imply an association with anti-American extremism.[17]

Soon after Insight's story, CNN reporter John Vause visited SDN Menteng 01 and found that each student received two hours of religious instruction per week in his or her own faith,[18] and was told, "This is a public school. We don't focus on religion."[19] Interviews by the Associated Press found that students of all faiths have been welcome there since before Obama's attendance.[20]

After being mentioned by Fox News, Insight's story was quickly debunked by other news organizations and widely villified by journalists, including the Columbia Journalism Review. The article was immediately denounced by Senator Obama and described as "an obvious right-wing hit job on both candidates" by a spokesperson for Senator Clinton. Journalists condemned the Insight report as an anonymous "double smear" for its impact on both candidates.

A critical January 29 story in The New York Times said of Insight editor Jeffrey T. Kuhner that Kuhner still considered the article to be "solid as solid can be." Kuhner, however, declined to say whether even he himself knew the identity of his unnamed reporter’s sources. The Times commented "perhaps only that reporter knows the origin of the article’s anonymous quotes and assertions. Its assertions about Mr. Obama resemble rumors passed on without evidence in e-mail messages..."[21]

The Columbia Journalism Review used the Insight example as "A lesson in how easy it is — even for publications with no history of credibility — to start a scandal." After quoting The New York Times recounting three other major Insight stories that have been discredited, the question was posed "after all this, why should we take seriously anything that this online rag has to say? Every news organization gets things wrong, but Insight seems to have developed a business model out of concocting fables."[1]

Story repeated in major media outlets

Despite the unproven status of the story's assertions, according to The New York Times "Hosts of morning television programs and an evening commentator on the Fox News Network nevertheless devoted extensive discussion to the Clinton-Obama article, as did Rush Limbaugh and other conservative talk radio hosts". This led to criticism of their journalistic practices.[22][1] Fox later admitted to error in reporting "information from a publication whose accuracy we didn’t know."[23][24]

SANE Project

In June of 2007, Insight reported on an undercover investigation of the Dar Al-Hijrah Islamic Center, located in Falls Church, Virginia, a suburb of Washington, D.C., by the group Society of Americans for National Existence (SANE). David Gaubatz, a spokesperson for the group, said:[25]

“The ultimate goal for those at Dar Al-Hijrah is to instill Sharia law in the U.S. and have America adhere to the Islamic faith. They want America to be an Islamic state.”

Insight's story was denounced by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).[26]

In February 2007 SANE had released a policy paper stating that the objective of SANE is to banish Islam from the US by making "adherence to Islam" ("defined as any act, including any written or oral declaration, in support of Shari’a or in furtherance of the imposition of Shari’a within any territory of the United States of America.") punishable by 20 years in prison.[27]

References

  1. ^ a b c McLeary, Paul (2007-01-29). "CJR "Insightmag, A Must-Read - A lesson in how easy it is — even for publications with no history of credibility — to start a scandal."". Colombia Journalism Review. Retrieved 2008-02-03. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  2. ^ Were the Republicans the "party of ideas"?
  3. ^ Kirkpatrick, David D. (January 29, 2007). "Feeding Frenzy For a Big Story, Even if It's False". NY Times. Retrieved 2007-11-25.
  4. ^ Kuhner, Jeffrey T. (January 31, 2007). "Distortions and lies at The New York Times". Insight. Retrieved 2007-11-25. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  5. ^ "About Media Matters".
  6. ^ "Google Scholar publications relating to "Blinded by the Right"".
  7. ^ AllPolitics - Arlington Claims 'Just Not True' - Nov. 21, 1997
  8. ^ CNN, Arlington Controversy Stirs Again, Dec. 4, 1997
  9. ^ CNN, Arlington Controversy Continues, Dec. 11, 1997
  10. ^ Widow Asks that Lawrence's body be removed from Arlington Cemetery (AP) Dec. 8, 1997
  11. ^ Paula Jones Rubs Shoulders With Washington Elite At Dinner CNN April 25, 1998
  12. ^ Google News Search - Libby "Fall Guy"
  13. ^ Sale, Richard (2004-02-05). "Cheney's Staff Focus of Probe". Insight Magazine and United Press International (in Straussian). News World Communications. Retrieved 2008-02-04. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
  14. ^ Google News Search - Libby Hannah Plame Leak
  15. ^ Walton, Douglas (November 1999). "The Fallacy of Many Questions: On the Notions of Complexity, Loadedness and Unfair Entrapment in Interrogative Theory". The Journal Argumentation. 13 (4): 379–383. doi:10.1023/A:1007727929716. Retrieved 2008-02-11. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  16. ^ Hillary's team has questions about Obama's Muslim background Insight January 11, 2007.
  17. ^ Moeller, Susan (2007-06-21). "Jumping on the US Bandwagon for a "War on Terror"". Yale Global Online. Yale Center for the Study of Globalization.
  18. ^ "www.chicagotribune.com".
  19. ^ "CNN debunks false report about Obama". CNN. January 22, 2007. Retrieved 2007-01-26.
  20. ^ Pickler, Nedra (2007-01-24). "Obama challenges allegation about Islamic school". San Diego Union-Tribune. Retrieved 2008-02-10.
  21. ^ "Feeding Frenzy for a Big Story, Even if It's False". New York Times. 29 January 2007. Retrieved 2007-01-29.
  22. ^ Kirkpatrick, David D (January 29 2007). "Feeding Frenzy for a Big Story, Even If It's False". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-09-30. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  23. ^ "www.cjr.org".
  24. ^ "Obama's Grudge Factor". Washington Post. January 31, 2007. Retrieved 2007-01-31.
  25. ^ "Insight Magazine Mapping Sharia Project Uncovers Jihadists near DC".
  26. ^ "Washington Times Promotes Hate Group That Would Outlaw Islam".
  27. ^ CAIR Attacks SANE and the Washington Times for Mapping Sharia Article

External links

See also