User talk:Kubura: Difference between revisions
Ivan Štambuk (talk | contribs) →CSSD: new section |
Ivan Štambuk (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
== CSSD == |
== CSSD == |
||
Hi, please discuss it [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Serbo-Croatian_language#Central_South_Slavic_Diasystem_and_SC_in_a_sense_.22collection_of_dialects.22|here]]. And do watch for your tone, as it's very disdainful at first sight, emanating negative energy. --[[User:Ivan Štambuk|Ivan Štambuk]] ([[User talk:Ivan Štambuk|talk]]) 15:40, 17 May 2009 (UTC) |
Hi, please discuss it [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Serbo-Croatian_language#Central_South_Slavic_Diasystem_and_SC_in_a_sense_.22collection_of_dialects.22|here]]. And do watch for your tone, as it's very disdainful at first sight, emanating negative energy. Also, try citing from those books relevant parts, and not your amateurish conclusions. For example, you saying ''There you'll see that Croatian and Serbian had separate lines of development'' - I'd really like to know in what scenario have Serbian and Croatian managed to have "separate lines of development", but managed to share 99% of grammar (phonology exactly the same, trivial differences in morphology & syntax). --[[User:Ivan Štambuk|Ivan Štambuk]] ([[User talk:Ivan Štambuk|talk]]) 15:40, 17 May 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:43, 17 May 2009
Bold textArchive 1 - Edits on "SC language"
Archive 2 - Srijem issues
Archive 3 - W.Herzog, Stjepan and Montenegro issues
Archive 4 - Cro-Ser questions, very interesting discussion, many topic being opened/touched/resolved
Archive 5 - Some Doclea and Dalmatia issues
Archive 6 - Farsi, Diego, NHL, Stjepan
Archive 7 - Republic of Dubrovnik, Haydn, various
Archive 8 - Mostly vandalism dealing, Zadar, Mikalja
Archive 9 - Saborsko, RfARB, prop, ...
Archive 10 - Italianization, Pagania, diacritics...
Archive 11 - Epics of Evlekis, some trolls, puppet theater, campaign of LAZ...
Proposed deletion of Ivan Radočaj
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ivan Radočaj, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Notability. No significant coverage of the subject outside his murder.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --aktsu (t / c) 08:51, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Register
Hello Kubura! Thanks for the friendly advice, I might just do that.123.2.59.195 (talk) 00:22, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Have Registed
Hi Kubura just a quick note. Just read the article on Pagania (again) it really needs a serious rewrite.Sir Floyd (talk) 04:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC) (formerly 123.2.59.195)
CSSD
Hi, please discuss it [[1]]. And do watch for your tone, as it's very disdainful at first sight, emanating negative energy. Also, try citing from those books relevant parts, and not your amateurish conclusions. For example, you saying There you'll see that Croatian and Serbian had separate lines of development - I'd really like to know in what scenario have Serbian and Croatian managed to have "separate lines of development", but managed to share 99% of grammar (phonology exactly the same, trivial differences in morphology & syntax). --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 15:40, 17 May 2009 (UTC)