Talk:Defending the Undefendable: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:41, 30 December 2013

Books Start‑class

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Libertarianism Start‑class

	Libertarianism portal Defending the Undefendable is within the scope of WikiProject Libertarianism, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Libertarianism and related subjects in the Wikipedia. Template Usage • Change Patrol • Articles Requested • Become a Member • Project Talk LibertarianismWikipedia:WikiProject LibertarianismTemplate:WikiProject LibertarianismLibertarianism articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

June 2013

"an example of the moral corruption to which libertarianism is prone." ...bias much? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.239.203.18 (talk • contribs) 14:22, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Harvard undergrad publication

An undergraduate publication, whether a magazine on politics/economics or a school paper, is not an RS for economics. I recognize that students at Harvard College are better than most, but they are still college kids. Their highest level of educational attainment is a HS diploma. Steeletrap (talk) 18:59, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

These publications often are used as RS. Also personal letters like Hayeks. We would need independent neutral 3rd party opinions on both of these. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 20:02, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Al Gore wrote for (and cofounded) HPR. Do you believe he was RS for economics when he was a teenager? Steeletrap (talk) 00:47, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mercy ! SPECIFICO talk 00:57, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stossel

Can't we find somebody more expert than John Stossel to comment on this significant work of libertarian doctrine? Seems weak. SPECIFICO talk 01:05, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Like the Hayek quote ~~your~~ Correction:Steeletrap removed? Took me 37 seconds to discover that John Gray in "Hayek on Liberty" talks about Hayek's "endorsement" of the book here. Hope you won't call it edit warring if I put that back in soon with that discussion. Will look for more when have 10 minutes to spare. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 02:01, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't strike through your lie about me removing Hayek content, I will seek to have you blocked per AEGS. I've warned you previously, there will be no further warnings. Strike your misrepresentation of my actions. SPECIFICO talk 02:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. With all the removals of material by the two or three of you the last few days, one can just get confused! AGF: it's an error and not a lie. Thanks. Carolmooredc (Talkie-Talkie) 03:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 Can't we find somebody more expert than John Stossel to comment on this significant work of libertarian doctrine?  Seems weak.  [[User:SPECIFICO |<font color ="0011FF"> '''SPECIFICO'''</font>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']]  01:05, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
-:Like the Hayek quote your removed? Took me 37 seconds to discover that John Gray in "Hayek on Liberty" talks about Hayek's "endorsement" of the book [http://books.google.com/books?id=PehkO7fUTwIC&pg=PA43 here]. Hope you won't call it edit warring if I put that back in soon with that discussion. Will look for more when have 10 minutes to spare. <small>'''[[User:Carolmooredc|Carolmooredc]]  ([[User talk:Carolmooredc|Talkie-Talkie]])</small>''' 02:01, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
+:Like the Hayek quote <s>your</s> Correction:Steeletrap removed? Took me 37 seconds to discover that John Gray in "Hayek on Liberty" talks about Hayek's "endorsement" of the book [http://books.google.com/books?id=PehkO7fUTwIC&pg=PA43 here]. Hope you won't call it edit warring if I put that back in soon with that discussion. Will look for more when have 10 minutes to spare. <small>'''[[User:Carolmooredc|Carolmooredc]]  ([[User talk:Carolmooredc|Talkie-Talkie]])</small>''' 02:01, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 ::If you don't strike through your lie about me removing Hayek content, I will seek to have you blocked per AEGS.  I've warned you previously, there will be no further warnings. Strike your misrepresentation of my actions.  [[User:SPECIFICO |<font color ="0011FF"> '''SPECIFICO'''</font>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']]  02:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
+:::Sorry. With all the removals of material by the two or three of you the last few days, one can just get confused! AGF: it's an error and not a lie. Thanks. <small>'''[[User:Carolmooredc|Carolmooredc]]  ([[User talk:Carolmooredc|Talkie-Talkie]])</small>''' 03:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)