User talk:Krimuk2.0: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:12, 9 December 2017

Tumhari Vidya

Tumhari Sulu has opened to strong reviews. So get ready to add this film in her lead. I want this film to do very well so that she can reclaim her power. A supremely talented actress like her is struggling and it's frustrating as hell. What do you think?Krish | Talk 18:18, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, let's see how well it does at the box office. --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 18:21, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you get a chance to see the film? I haven't seen it yet but I am so happy that it is doing decent business at the Box Office.Krish | Talk 10:18, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet. I'll probably watch it this weekend. --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:44, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should remove Te3n from her lead as it didn't do much for her career and even her role was not that acclaimed.Krish | Talk 14:02, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Moneyball (film)/archive1

I would appreciate your comments for this one, Krimuk mere dost. This is my first attempt at a Hollywood film accolades list BTW (I chose this film as it kind of grew on me every time I saw it on TV). Do let me know if you are interested in reviewing this by pinging me. Thank you. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 16:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you are willing, you can comment here too. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 07:18, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Chandralekha (1948 film)

Krimuk, seeing your copyedits on The Tree of Life awards list, I would very much appreciate if you could give a good copyedit for the critical response section of this film. It is undergoing an FAR at the moment (the article was improved to FA by Kailash29792) and it would be great if you agreed to do this. Thanks. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 13:39, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kate Winslet

You may not have noticed, but the content of the article itself is unchanged. It's still the same single sentence. The quote is back in the refs section, and another ref has been added to back up the assertion that she did not use a merkin. This has been the content for many years, and there is no good reason to remove it.

That she did not use a merkin is contrary to numerous inaccurate reports by other sources, including ones we normally consider RS. They say she did use one. Therefore we have to use her own words. The reason this has any importance is because it has been widely reported, using the quote itself, to claim she DID use a merkin. That was done by only using part of the quote. Writers have done shoddy work and misread her. By providing the full quote and the extra source, we help to clear up this misunderstanding. -- BullRangifer (talk) 03:47, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Award winner Sulu

So happy that Vidya finally got what she deserves. Plus, happy for Irrfan, Neha and Rajkummar. Now I am more excited to Tumhari Sulu. By the way, I'm not sure if Irrfan had won Popular because that category was retired last year and Critics actor was started ....So I think the Best Actor was given to Irrfan and Critics one was given to Rajkummar.....But I'm not sure.Krish | Talk 18:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, their categories are all over the place as usual. But from what I gather, Irrfan did win the popular choice award. --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But I saw the name on Irrfan's award which says Best Actor Male.....and Vidya's award has Best Actor Female name on it. It is also known that the main Filmfare Best Actor award is referred as Popular while the Critics Award, is well referred as Critics. So technically Irrfan is calling the main Best Actor award as Popular and not the retired "Screen Award popular". Plus Rajkumar has won Critics award.Krish | Talk 19:47, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Some sources didn't report this properly. Irrfan won Best Actor; Rajkummar won Best Actor (Critics); Vidya won Best Actress; Konkona won Best Actress (Critics). --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:56, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Are you sure Vidya won the "popular" award. Majority of the sites shows that Konkona won the popular award and Vidya was given the critics. -- Bollywood Dreamz ^talk 02:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Krimuk2.0. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Steve McQueen filmography/archive1

I would appreciate your comments as always here, Krimuk. Do let me know if you are interested in reviewing this by pinging me. Thank you. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 12:55, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssven2: sure thing. In the meantime, could you look at the Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Michelle Williams on screen and stage/archive2? I'm afraid it's a bit stuck at the moment. --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 13:09, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Do review mine. Thanks.

— Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 13:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A gentle reminder. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 17:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Help with Current FAC

Hello again! I hope that you are having a wonderful week so far. I was wondering if you could possibly help me with my current FAC? I have decided to return to the FAC process, but I went with projects that I feel be rather easy to put through the reviews in comparison to Sévérine. Either way, good luck with your current work and your future projects. Aoba47 (talk) 02:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Glad to see you back on the FAC track. Will comment there shortly. :) --Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:49, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 21:22, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 83: / Line 83: @@
 :Thank you. Glad to see you back on the FAC track. Will comment there shortly. :) --[[User:Krimuk2.0|Krimuk2.0]] ([[User talk:Krimuk2.0#top|talk]]) 06:49, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 ::*Thank you! [[User:Aoba47|Aoba47]] ([[User talk:Aoba47|talk]]) 21:22, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
-== Advice ==
-Templating another editor when fractions are high is never a good idea.  It comes across as pompous, overly officious, and very patronising. If you have a problem with someone, it's best to talk to them like a human being, and not like a bot. We've met before, on Zeta Jones, and our exchange there was good, so I know you'll take this advice in good faith. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px Black;">[[User:Cassianto|<span style="font-family: Papyrus;">Cassianto</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Cassianto#top|<span style="font-family: Papyrus;">Talk</span>]]</sup></span>''' 17:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)