User talk:CharlesShirley: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 107.13.227.173 - "→January 2021: Telling it like it is." Tag: Reverted |
→January 2021: funny comments, but not in an intentional way. Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Purplebackpack89|Purplebackpack89]]. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]. Your recent edit to [[:Lauren Boebert]] seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Purplebackpack89|my talk page]]. ''You are clearly trying to edit the article to downplay Boebert's support for far-right organizations.'' <!-- Template:uw-npov1 --> <span style="border:1px solid;background:#800080">[[User:Purplebackpack89|<span style="color:#FFCC00">p</span>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<span style="color:#FFCC00;">b</span>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/C|<span style="color:#FFCC00;">p</span>]]</span> 00:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC) |
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Purplebackpack89|Purplebackpack89]]. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]. Your recent edit to [[:Lauren Boebert]] seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Purplebackpack89|my talk page]]. ''You are clearly trying to edit the article to downplay Boebert's support for far-right organizations.'' <!-- Template:uw-npov1 --> <span style="border:1px solid;background:#800080">[[User:Purplebackpack89|<span style="color:#FFCC00">p</span>]][[User talk:Purplebackpack89|<span style="color:#FFCC00;">b</span>]][[User:Purplebackpack89/C|<span style="color:#FFCC00;">p</span>]]</span> 00:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC) |
||
::::Ha. Ha. You are pretending that you are some kind of superior or something. Very funny. But not in an intentional way. - [[User:CharlesShirley|CharlesShirley]] ([[User talk:CharlesShirley#top|talk]]) 15:15, 13 January 2021 (UTC) |
|||
This does not surprise me at all [[User:Purplebackpack89|Purplebackpack89]]. My own experience with Mr Shirley is under the guise of adherence to the "basic rules of Wikipedia" he edits out anything he comes across not in sync with his extremist far right pro-Trump POV. Honestly it would not suprise me if the dude took part in the recent insurrectionist riot at the US Captiol, but I do not know that he did or didnt I must say, so I am not accusing just saying it would not surprise me. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/107.13.227.173|107.13.227.173]] ([[User talk:107.13.227.173#top|talk]]) 13:43, 13 January 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
This does not surprise me at all [[User:Purplebackpack89|Purplebackpack89]]. My own experience with Mr Shirley is under the guise of adherence to the "basic rules of Wikipedia" he edits out anything he comes across not in sync with his extremist far right pro-Trump POV. Honestly it would not suprise me if the dude took part in the recent insurrectionist riot at the US Captiol, but I do not know that he did or didnt I must say, so I am not accusing just saying it would not surprise me. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/107.13.227.173|107.13.227.173]] ([[User talk:107.13.227.173#top|talk]]) 13:43, 13 January 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:::::Ha. Ha. You are an IP editor refusing to come out in the sunshine of transparancy by creating an account. You are probably a sockpuppet of some editor who keeps making BLP violating edits to the Boebert article. Also, you comment is not only against Wikipedia rules, but it seems to be defamation of character. - [[User:CharlesShirley|CharlesShirley]] ([[User talk:CharlesShirley#top|talk]]) 15:15, 13 January 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:15, 13 January 2021
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
January 2021
Hello, I'm Purplebackpack89. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Lauren Boebert seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You are clearly trying to edit the article to downplay Boebert's support for far-right organizations. pbp 00:17, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ha. Ha. You are pretending that you are some kind of superior or something. Very funny. But not in an intentional way. - CharlesShirley (talk) 15:15, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
This does not surprise me at all Purplebackpack89. My own experience with Mr Shirley is under the guise of adherence to the "basic rules of Wikipedia" he edits out anything he comes across not in sync with his extremist far right pro-Trump POV. Honestly it would not suprise me if the dude took part in the recent insurrectionist riot at the US Captiol, but I do not know that he did or didnt I must say, so I am not accusing just saying it would not surprise me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.13.227.173 (talk) 13:43, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ha. Ha. You are an IP editor refusing to come out in the sunshine of transparancy by creating an account. You are probably a sockpuppet of some editor who keeps making BLP violating edits to the Boebert article. Also, you comment is not only against Wikipedia rules, but it seems to be defamation of character. - CharlesShirley (talk) 15:15, 13 January 2021 (UTC)