Jump to content

User talk:Bhojpal1234: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Standard notice: new section
Tag: contentious topics alert
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 54: Line 54:


[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Heba Aisha|Heba Aisha]]. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Heba Aisha|my talk page]]. ''Here [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000714002], the Rajput article has numerous high quality source that doubts your personal claim'' <!-- Template:uw-npov1 --> [[User:Heba Aisha|Heba Aisha]] ([[User talk:Heba Aisha|talk]]) 13:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Heba Aisha|Heba Aisha]]. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Heba Aisha|my talk page]]. ''Here [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1000714002], the Rajput article has numerous high quality source that doubts your personal claim'' <!-- Template:uw-npov1 --> [[User:Heba Aisha|Heba Aisha]] ([[User talk:Heba Aisha|talk]]) 13:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

First, it is not my personal claim, I have given historical references for it.
Second,CV Vaidya is much acclaimed author and historians than those you are citing.
Third, contemporary text of Al Masudi talks about Rajput Rule in Kandhar, at the same time Heuin Tsang, talks about Kshatriyas rule in Kandhar, hence Rajputs and Kshatriyas were synonymous to each other during those times. It also shows that rajput identity predated 10th century as claimed by a Tablot. Hence Tablot is not reliable. [[User:Bhojpal1234|Bhojpal1234]] ([[User talk:Bhojpal1234#top|talk]]) 15:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)


== Standard notice ==
== Standard notice ==

Revision as of 15:15, 16 January 2021

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 11:03, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bhojpal1234, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Bhojpal1234! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


Your opinion based edit on Kushwaha

I think you haven't read properly before removing Kachhawaha from the article? It was not written that that one is similar to Kushwaha caste. It meant that all the four caste lay similar claims of being a descendent of Kusha. It was sourced from peasant and monk in British India. Please refrain from opinion based edits. The sentence you removed highlights [only] the claim of both these agricultural castes and the rajput clan because, the claim of none of these holds water as Kachhawas rajput were himself descendents of tribals who were tortoise killer. Heba Aisha (talk) 20:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to re read the paragraph and the sentence, it talks about the sub-castes of Kushwaha community, Kachwahas were never thr sub caste of Kushwaha Backward community. I have seen you have tried to related them on Kachwaha page as well. As far as their origin is considered please keep the personal commentary to yourself, thank you. Bhojpal1234 (talk) 07:38, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you had clearly read the talk page of Kachhawa you would have known that I was not relating the both but supporting another user who was separating both. And yes I have read there is no Similarity between both as the Kachhawa were actually known throughout the history as subordinate of Mughals while the peasant caste had not gained notability until british rule came.Heba Aisha (talk) 13:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm Heba Aisha. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Here [1], the Rajput article has numerous high quality source that doubts your personal claim Heba Aisha (talk) 13:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First, it is not my personal claim, I have given historical references for it. Second,CV Vaidya is much acclaimed author and historians than those you are citing. Third, contemporary text of Al Masudi talks about Rajput Rule in Kandhar, at the same time Heuin Tsang, talks about Kshatriyas rule in Kandhar, hence Rajputs and Kshatriyas were synonymous to each other during those times. It also shows that rajput identity predated 10th century as claimed by a Tablot. Hence Tablot is not reliable. Bhojpal1234 (talk) 15:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Standard notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ravensfire (talk) 14:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Template:Z33[reply]