Jump to content

Talk:Observer's Books: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 14: Line 14:
The following is personal observation, so not reliably sourced, but may prompt research from someone better placed.
The following is personal observation, so not reliably sourced, but may prompt research from someone better placed.


Having an interest in Nature since childhood, I acquired a number of Observers Books, and subsequently other publications including a number published by Frederick Warne & Co. I have noticed that the Observer's Books volumes on a given nature topic are usually abridgements of more comprehensive volumes previously published by Warne in their 'Wayside and Woodland' series, with greatly edited-down texts and of illustrations extensively drawn from the 'parent' W&W titles. The latter were evidently aimed at an adult-level readership and some were originally published, by Warne or other publishers, as early as the 1890s. [[Special:Contributions/90.200.40.9|90.200.40.9]] ([[User talk:90.200.40.9|talk]]) 11:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Having an interest in Nature since childhood, I acquired a number of Observers Books, and subsequently other publications including a number published by Frederick Warne & Co. I have noticed that the Observer's Books volumes on a given nature topic are usually abridgements of more comprehensive volumes previously published by Warne in their 'Wayside and Woodland' series, with greatly edited-down texts and of illustrations extensively drawn from the 'parent' W&W titles. The latter were evidently aimed at an adult-level readership and some were originally published, by Warne or other publishers, as early as the 1890s. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} [[Special:Contributions/90.200.40.9|90.200.40.9]] ([[User talk:90.200.40.9|talk]]) 11:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:27, 4 February 2021

WikiProject iconBooks Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconReference works Stub‑class (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Reference works, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

All the external links are to commercial websites of book dealers. Should they be in Wikipedia? Unless anyone has any objection, I propose deleting them as per WP:LINKSTOAVOID. Tony Holkham (talk) 14:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let's do it at once. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What a waste of good editors' time.SovalValtos (talk) 16:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Derivation of content

The following is personal observation, so not reliably sourced, but may prompt research from someone better placed.

Having an interest in Nature since childhood, I acquired a number of Observers Books, and subsequently other publications including a number published by Frederick Warne & Co. I have noticed that the Observer's Books volumes on a given nature topic are usually abridgements of more comprehensive volumes previously published by Warne in their 'Wayside and Woodland' series, with greatly edited-down texts and of illustrations extensively drawn from the 'parent' W&W titles. The latter were evidently aimed at an adult-level readership and some were originally published, by Warne or other publishers, as early as the 1890s. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 90.200.40.9 (talk) 11:27, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]