Talk:SMS Rheinland: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:58, 17 February 2021

SMS Rheinland is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

SMS Rheinland is part of the Battleships of Germany series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 7, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
July 20, 2010	Good topic candidate	Promoted
August 20, 2010	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
January 22, 2011	Featured article candidate	Promoted
August 25, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 22, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in order to refloat her after running aground off Finland in 1918, SMS Rheinland* needed 6,400 metric tons of equipment removed, more than a third of her normal displacement?*
Current status: Featured article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Ships FA‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan FA‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

FA

This article has been rated as FA-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Germany FA‑class Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Rheinland/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Fix the things I've noted in the text.
I reworded the first and clarified the second. How does it look now? Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

B. MoS compliance:
Publisher location needed for Tarrant
Added. Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Is another picture available?
I haven't been able to find any other images of the ship; there's a somewhat bad linedrawing in the 1911 Brasseys (here) - that might be worth uploading and adding to the article. I did add a photo of the Black Prince to the Jutland section. Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I like plan views for all of these early dreadnoughts so you can show what the odd turret arrangements looked like rather than relying only on a textual description. But it's your call, though I'd look for a better scan than that one.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

torpedo tubes

5 in the infobox, 6 in the text -- possibly in all the articles for the class Suppongoche (talk) 17:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 {{Talk:SMS Rheinland/GA1}}
+== torpedo tubes ==
+in the infobox, 6 in the text -- possibly in all the articles for the class [[User:Suppongoche|Suppongoche]] ([[User talk:Suppongoche|talk]]) 17:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)