User talk:ImoutoCompAlex

February 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 17:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ImoutoCompAlex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I vow to not make any more personal attacks towards editors and I will delete my rant on the cusper discussion. My reason for losing my temper is that I have a lot of emotional investment in generations as I have lost a lot of close family/friends over the years so a being able to identify as the exact same generation as what cusper friends I still have left means the absolute world to me. As someone born in late 1991, I cannot stand the fact that this "scientifically" legitimizes the claim that someone born in 1984 is a core Millennial along with me (a literal 7 year difference) and that therefore this implies heavily I am more of the same cohort with a 1984 baby than a 1992 baby, which makes me irrationally angry. The lack of an objective source including 1991 as a cusper year also makes me feel angry depressed and alone and people will not take me seriously by how much this offends me. ImoutoCompAlex (talk) 04:06, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Perhaps you need to find a more suitable place to deal with your feelings and express them to an understanding and supportive audience. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 04:53, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

An unblock request that is chiefly devoted to self-justification isn't likely to succeed. I only blocked you for 48 hours initially, until I reviewed your editing history and found things like this [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. I don't see any way that you have any business editing this project with that kind of conduct. Acroterion (talk) 04:18, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Alright so I'm reading the page now and it says here that I just need to show you through evidence that the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I am blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions. So try unblocking me for 48 hours as a litmus test to see if I will actually start making positive contributions and I will make other contributions towards the community and let that cusper page be as it is. You're the one with the power to simply re-block me if I lash out again so I don't see why this isn't a valid appeal.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ImoutoCompAlex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was wrong to lash out immaturely and from now on will maintain proper objective conduct within this community. I will also abandon disruptive edits to the wikipedia cusper page entirely and not dispute them anymore. I will edit other pages instead. I am very new to Wikipedia, very personally invested in generation-ology and did not read the rules. ImoutoCompAlex (talk) 04:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm not convinced that within a half hour you have seen the light and will change your ways. Agreeing to not edit the Cusper page is a start, but we will need to know what steps you will take to avoid making comments like the ones linked to by Acroterion. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:48, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I want to have my username changed as this name is tied to an email account I use for professional work so this information indirectly makes me personally identifiable. Please unblock me so I can change my username then you may re-block if you wish.

You can tell us what new username you want and we can rename you, if you wish. 331dot (talk) 09:48, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. Regarding my username, I would like my account to be renamed to SisterElfriede. You seem like a good person who really cares about me and wants me to reform. I found your message very encouraging and outlined some additional steps I will talk to better my behavior in a subsequent post.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

ImoutoCompAlex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello admins. Regarding my username, I would like my account to be renamed to SisterElfriede

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello admins. Regarding my username, I would like my account to be renamed to SisterElfriede |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello admins. Regarding my username, I would like my account to be renamed to SisterElfriede |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello admins. Regarding my username, I would like my account to be renamed to SisterElfriede |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

ImoutoCompAlex (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi again admins. I actually do appreciate the decline post from the last admin as he seemed to be encouraging me to reform. He (user 331dot) declined my last appeal on the grounds that I was not specific enough on outlining details to better my behavior and that he was not convinced that I had changed within merely half an hour. That's a valid criticism. Therefore, I will outline specific steps of a more detail-oriented plan to better my behavior going forward on this platform (I just joined Wikipedia 6 days ago). I plan to police my language within edits ensuring that only constructive and non-hostile language is used. I will also review my edits and edit titles and documentation to account for tone as well as language with the potential to be misinterpreted as hostile. I will only submit peer reviewed sources that are not self published when I make changes. I will try my best to be objective and not emotionally driven when I update pages. I will promote constructive team-oriented discussion within the talk pages for subjects. I will delete my past edits to talk pages that have been disruptive or contained obscene and destructive language. I will leave the cusper page alone but potentially build onto it should I find some other academic or peer reviewed sources worth adding. Of course I will consult with the other editors before doing so. Other than the steps I have outlined, I am not sure how to realistically prove to you that I have changed. Be forgiving in your expectations of me please. As someone who moderates and admins many online communities and has encountered hostile language directed at me, I have always taken steps as a moderator to "be forgiving" and understand that people lose themselves in the moment sometimes and act unreasonably. With this in mind, I myself often go out of my way to simply issue a temporary ban and a warning multiple times before escalating the matter to a permanent ban. Even then I have sometimes reversed bans if a person came back to me after a year and was still motivated to build up a community that needed passionate members. Going back to your case with me, there is no real way for me to prove to you beyond a reasonable doubt that I have changed other than you unblocking me from editing and observing what happens regarding my account going forward. You have my ip address and I'm on your radar now so there is little reason for me to write all this and lie to you. I hope that with these words you will reconsider your opinion of me. Regards.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hi again admins. I actually do appreciate the decline post from the last admin as he seemed to be encouraging me to reform. He (user 331dot) declined my last appeal on the grounds that I was not specific enough on outlining details to better my behavior and that he was not convinced that I had changed within merely half an hour. That's a valid criticism. Therefore, I will outline specific steps of a more detail-oriented plan to better my behavior going forward on this platform (I just joined Wikipedia 6 days ago). I plan to police my language within edits ensuring that only constructive and non-hostile language is used. I will also review my edits and edit titles and documentation to account for tone as well as language with the potential to be misinterpreted as hostile. I will only submit peer reviewed sources that are not self published when I make changes. I will try my best to be objective and not emotionally driven when I update pages. I will promote constructive team-oriented discussion within the talk pages for subjects. I will delete my past edits to talk pages that have been disruptive or contained obscene and destructive language. I will leave the cusper page alone but potentially build onto it should I find some other academic or peer reviewed sources worth adding. Of course I will consult with the other editors before doing so. Other than the steps I have outlined, I am not sure how to realistically prove to you that I have changed. Be forgiving in your expectations of me please. As someone who moderates and admins many online communities and has encountered hostile language directed at me, I have always taken steps as a moderator to "be forgiving" and understand that people lose themselves in the moment sometimes and act unreasonably. With this in mind, I myself often go out of my way to simply issue a temporary ban and a warning multiple times before escalating the matter to a permanent ban. Even then I have sometimes reversed bans if a person came back to me after a year and was still motivated to build up a community that needed passionate members. Going back to your case with me, there is no real way for me to prove to you beyond a reasonable doubt that I have changed other than you unblocking me from editing and observing what happens regarding my account going forward. You have my ip address and I'm on your radar now so there is little reason for me to write all this and lie to you. I hope that with these words you will reconsider your opinion of me. Regards. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi again admins. I actually do appreciate the decline post from the last admin as he seemed to be encouraging me to reform. He (user 331dot) declined my last appeal on the grounds that I was not specific enough on outlining details to better my behavior and that he was not convinced that I had changed within merely half an hour. That's a valid criticism. Therefore, I will outline specific steps of a more detail-oriented plan to better my behavior going forward on this platform (I just joined Wikipedia 6 days ago). I plan to police my language within edits ensuring that only constructive and non-hostile language is used. I will also review my edits and edit titles and documentation to account for tone as well as language with the potential to be misinterpreted as hostile. I will only submit peer reviewed sources that are not self published when I make changes. I will try my best to be objective and not emotionally driven when I update pages. I will promote constructive team-oriented discussion within the talk pages for subjects. I will delete my past edits to talk pages that have been disruptive or contained obscene and destructive language. I will leave the cusper page alone but potentially build onto it should I find some other academic or peer reviewed sources worth adding. Of course I will consult with the other editors before doing so. Other than the steps I have outlined, I am not sure how to realistically prove to you that I have changed. Be forgiving in your expectations of me please. As someone who moderates and admins many online communities and has encountered hostile language directed at me, I have always taken steps as a moderator to "be forgiving" and understand that people lose themselves in the moment sometimes and act unreasonably. With this in mind, I myself often go out of my way to simply issue a temporary ban and a warning multiple times before escalating the matter to a permanent ban. Even then I have sometimes reversed bans if a person came back to me after a year and was still motivated to build up a community that needed passionate members. Going back to your case with me, there is no real way for me to prove to you beyond a reasonable doubt that I have changed other than you unblocking me from editing and observing what happens regarding my account going forward. You have my ip address and I'm on your radar now so there is little reason for me to write all this and lie to you. I hope that with these words you will reconsider your opinion of me. Regards. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hi again admins. I actually do appreciate the decline post from the last admin as he seemed to be encouraging me to reform. He (user 331dot) declined my last appeal on the grounds that I was not specific enough on outlining details to better my behavior and that he was not convinced that I had changed within merely half an hour. That's a valid criticism. Therefore, I will outline specific steps of a more detail-oriented plan to better my behavior going forward on this platform (I just joined Wikipedia 6 days ago). I plan to police my language within edits ensuring that only constructive and non-hostile language is used. I will also review my edits and edit titles and documentation to account for tone as well as language with the potential to be misinterpreted as hostile. I will only submit peer reviewed sources that are not self published when I make changes. I will try my best to be objective and not emotionally driven when I update pages. I will promote constructive team-oriented discussion within the talk pages for subjects. I will delete my past edits to talk pages that have been disruptive or contained obscene and destructive language. I will leave the cusper page alone but potentially build onto it should I find some other academic or peer reviewed sources worth adding. Of course I will consult with the other editors before doing so. Other than the steps I have outlined, I am not sure how to realistically prove to you that I have changed. Be forgiving in your expectations of me please. As someone who moderates and admins many online communities and has encountered hostile language directed at me, I have always taken steps as a moderator to "be forgiving" and understand that people lose themselves in the moment sometimes and act unreasonably. With this in mind, I myself often go out of my way to simply issue a temporary ban and a warning multiple times before escalating the matter to a permanent ban. Even then I have sometimes reversed bans if a person came back to me after a year and was still motivated to build up a community that needed passionate members. Going back to your case with me, there is no real way for me to prove to you beyond a reasonable doubt that I have changed other than you unblocking me from editing and observing what happens regarding my account going forward. You have my ip address and I'm on your radar now so there is little reason for me to write all this and lie to you. I hope that with these words you will reconsider your opinion of me. Regards. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}