Talk:Glacier National Park (U.S.): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 27 discussion(s) to Talk:Glacier National Park (U.S.)/Archive 1) (bot Tag: Replaced |
→FA sweeps: Reply |
||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
:The article had a major update in 2010 and while that is still a decade ago, it is a few years after ti went to FAC. The reason for the update was to prepare it for the 100th anniversary of the founding of the park in 1910.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] ([[User talk:MONGO|talk]]) 08:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC) |
:The article had a major update in 2010 and while that is still a decade ago, it is a few years after ti went to FAC. The reason for the update was to prepare it for the 100th anniversary of the founding of the park in 1910.--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] ([[User talk:MONGO|talk]]) 08:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
:I really don't get why people like yourself can find the time to slap cite needed tags on articles (asking in many cases for a citation for what is hardly a controversial issue that needs a citation!) and not the time to do a tiny bit of reference searching on their own. It looks like shit to be frank. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glacier_National_Park_%28U.S.%29&type=revision&diff=997378033&oldid=997250768] are cites really needed for obvious details like where route 2 goes or about whether dogs are allowed on trails or that guide and shuttle services are available?? Also if you're going to festoon FAs with such pollution, add a date to the tags would you?[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glacier_National_Park_(U.S.)&diff=next&oldid=997378033]--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] ([[User talk:MONGO|talk]]) 08:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC) |
:I really don't get why people like yourself can find the time to slap cite needed tags on articles (asking in many cases for a citation for what is hardly a controversial issue that needs a citation!) and not the time to do a tiny bit of reference searching on their own. It looks like shit to be frank. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glacier_National_Park_%28U.S.%29&type=revision&diff=997378033&oldid=997250768] are cites really needed for obvious details like where route 2 goes or about whether dogs are allowed on trails or that guide and shuttle services are available?? Also if you're going to festoon FAs with such pollution, add a date to the tags would you?[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Glacier_National_Park_(U.S.)&diff=next&oldid=997378033]--[[User:MONGO|MONGO]] ([[User talk:MONGO|talk]]) 08:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC) |
||
::I'm going to mark this as satisfactory with note. There are two sentences that need updating in my opinion, and I can't get the climate template to expand per default for the manual of style. @[[User:MONGO|MONGO]], if you agree with me, you're also invited to mark your own featured article(s) as satisfactory at [[Wikipedia:URFA/2020]]. [[User:Femkemilene|FemkeMilene]] ([[User talk:Femkemilene|talk]]) 20:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:34, 4 March 2021
Glacier National Park (U.S.) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 11, 2010. | ||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 11, 2012 and May 11, 2018. |
Toolbox |
---|
Glacier National Park (U.S.) is part of the National Park Service series, a former featured topic candidate. Please view its sub-page to see why the nomination failed. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the topic for featured topic status. |
This is the talk page for discussing Glacier National Park (U.S.) and anything related to its purposes and tasks. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glacier National Park (U.S.) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
Picture
That picture is too large and covers over the template. It should be tweeked to fit, but know not how to do it myself so I thought I'd bring it up here.
-E. Brown--Squawk Box 12 July 2005
Map error
The location indicated on the map is the location of Yellowstone National Park.
FA sweeps
I reviewed this article as it is one of the oldest unreviewed featured articles. I noticed that it has accumulated some unsourced statements, and flagged them. I am not a specialist in this area so there may well be other issues that I didn't notice. (t · c) buidhe 06:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- The article had a major update in 2010 and while that is still a decade ago, it is a few years after ti went to FAC. The reason for the update was to prepare it for the 100th anniversary of the founding of the park in 1910.--MONGO (talk) 08:26, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- I really don't get why people like yourself can find the time to slap cite needed tags on articles (asking in many cases for a citation for what is hardly a controversial issue that needs a citation!) and not the time to do a tiny bit of reference searching on their own. It looks like shit to be frank. [1] are cites really needed for obvious details like where route 2 goes or about whether dogs are allowed on trails or that guide and shuttle services are available?? Also if you're going to festoon FAs with such pollution, add a date to the tags would you?[2]--MONGO (talk) 08:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- I'm going to mark this as satisfactory with note. There are two sentences that need updating in my opinion, and I can't get the climate template to expand per default for the manual of style. @MONGO, if you agree with me, you're also invited to mark your own featured article(s) as satisfactory at Wikipedia:URFA/2020. FemkeMilene (talk) 20:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- FA-Class Protected areas articles
- High-importance Protected areas articles
- Articles of WikiProject Protected areas
- FA-Class Glacier articles
- Low-importance Glacier articles
- WikiProject Glacier articles
- FA-Class Montana articles
- High-importance Montana articles
- WikiProject Montana articles
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Selected anniversaries (May 2012)
- Selected anniversaries (May 2018)