Talk:Red corridor: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
{{requested move/dated|Red Corridor}} |
{{requested move/dated|Red Corridor}} |
||
[[:Red corridor]] → {{no redirect|Red Corridor}} – It's a proper noun and the most common name (see [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Red+corridor%2CRed+Corridor&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2CRed%20corridor%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2CRed%20Corridor%3B%2Cc0 Google Ngram Viwer]). By the way, there also needs to be a history merge between them (see above). [[User:Charles Essie|Charles Essie]] ([[User talk:Charles Essie|talk]]) 20:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC) |
[[:Red corridor]] → {{no redirect|Red Corridor}} – It's a proper noun and the most common name (see [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Red+corridor%2CRed+Corridor&year_start=1800&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3&direct_url=t1%3B%2CRed%20corridor%3B%2Cc0%3B.t1%3B%2CRed%20Corridor%3B%2Cc0 Google Ngram Viwer]). By the way, there also needs to be a history merge between them (see above). [[User:Charles Essie|Charles Essie]] ([[User talk:Charles Essie|talk]]) 20:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC) |
||
*'''Support'''. It ain't just a red corridor. [[Special:Contributions/98.143.65.225|98.143.65.225]] ([[User talk:98.143.65.225|talk]]) 12:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:50, 16 April 2021
India Start‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Socialism Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
A fact from Red corridor appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 October 2008, and was viewed approximately 669 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
bias
Article is full of bias for one political agenda and against another and reads like a India's nationalist party propaganda 96.31.190.97 (talk) 09:18, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi 96.31.190.97. It may be so, but it would be helpful if you could point out specific instances of bias? Once you have done that, you should also back it up with some reliable sources (see WP:RS). If you can get that together, we can certainly add your contributions to the article. Your claim seems quite bizarre though - Naxalites seem to be by definition a terrorist group, and I can't seem to see any particular bias in the article. To allege propaganda without adequate proof is quite a claim (see WP:GF). John.k.newton (talk) 13:03, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
History merger needed
It appears that this page was originally titled Red Corridor (which I actually think is better) and was moved here via copy-and-paste. Because of this, I think a history merge is necessary. Charles Essie (talk) 04:27, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Requested move 15 April 2021
It has been proposed in this section that Red corridor be renamed and moved to Red Corridor. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Red corridor → Red Corridor – It's a proper noun and the most common name (see Google Ngram Viwer). By the way, there also needs to be a history merge between them (see above). Charles Essie (talk) 20:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support. It ain't just a red corridor. 98.143.65.225 (talk) 12:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
- Start-Class India articles
- High-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of High-importance
- India articles without infoboxes
- Wikipedia requested photographs in India
- WikiProject India articles
- Start-Class socialism articles
- Mid-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Requested moves