Talk:Mike Wozniak

Spoiler/no source given

I don't understand why my edit was undone.

1. Having a spoiler to a series that hasn't even finished airing yet is surely a terrible addition to an article? 2. There's not even a source and I couldn't find any proof that he actually won series 11 of Taskmaster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SilverEye91 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Removal of Prod on 2/14

I have removed the prod placed on this article. I disagree with the assertion that the article should be deleted. While the article does indeed fail WP:Entertainer, it meets WP:GNG and WP:Notability, which override WP:Entertainer, as WP:Entertainer is merely an additional point of entry for notability, not a replacement of the general notability guidelines. The individual has multiple, non-trivial, media mentions in reliable sources (listed below) that establish notability sufficient to merit inclusion in Wikipedia.

• http://www.newsshopper.co.uk/leisure/4071335.Interview__Mike_Wozniak/ (interview with media outlet)
• http://www.chortle.co.uk/comics/m/33410/mike_wozniak (trivial mention but lends weight)
• http://www.edfringe.com/shows/detail.php?action=shows&id=1480 (trivial mention but lends weight)
• http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/comedy/reviews/mike-wozniak-medina--negociants-edinburgh-festival-901745.html (a review by a major newspaper)
• http://www.spoonfed.co.uk/artist/comedy-1524/mike-wozniak-17603/ (significant mention is less reliable media)

In light of the sources, I think the individual is marginally notable, sufficient for inclusion in Wikipedia. Since I can certainly see how one might disagree, feel free to nominate for deletion via AfD. I think the article needs work, not deletion. Jo7hs2 (talk) 01:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mike Wozniak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090311015158/http://www.ifcomedy.com/newcomers.html to http://www.ifcomedy.com/newcomers.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.timeout.com/london/comedy/blog/5450/Mike_Wozniak-Medina_Negociants.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090516074251/http://www.amusedmoose.com/article/amusedmoose_laughoff_awards.html to http://www.amusedmoose.com/article/amusedmoose_laughoff_awards.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)