Talk:Mike Wozniak: Difference between revisions
→Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2021: responding |
SilverEye91 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
I would also like to say to whoever keeps reverting the edits: Please talk, don't just do. It is very frustrating when you're having, what you feel was, a good edited reverted with no explanation. [[User:SilverEye91|SilverEye91]] ([[User talk:SilverEye91|talk]]) 19:57, 23 April 2021 (UTC) |
I would also like to say to whoever keeps reverting the edits: Please talk, don't just do. It is very frustrating when you're having, what you feel was, a good edited reverted with no explanation. [[User:SilverEye91|SilverEye91]] ([[User talk:SilverEye91|talk]]) 19:57, 23 April 2021 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|SilverEye91}} It seems this is all sorted now. Because the content was not sourced, it was removed and an [[WP:admin|admin]] has protected the article to prevent further disruption. For future reference per [[WP:SPOILER]], generally spoilers are allowed and should not be removed if appropriately sourced. [[User:S0091|S0091]] ([[User talk:S0091|talk]]) 20:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC) |
:{{ping|SilverEye91}} It seems this is all sorted now. Because the content was not sourced, it was removed and an [[WP:admin|admin]] has protected the article to prevent further disruption. For future reference per [[WP:SPOILER]], generally spoilers are allowed and should not be removed if appropriately sourced. [[User:S0091|S0091]] ([[User talk:S0091|talk]]) 20:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|S0091}} I understand that spoilers should be allowed on Wikipedia articles and I don't wish to imply that I have a problem with those as a general rule. However, spoilers before said source is even out is a different thing entirely. Especially when they aren't sourced. Seems more like vandalism at that stage. But thanks for clearing it up anyway! |
Revision as of 20:58, 23 April 2021
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
Biography: Actors and Filmmakers Stub‑class | ||||||||||||||||
|
Comedy Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Removal of Prod on 2/14
I have removed the prod placed on this article. I disagree with the assertion that the article should be deleted. While the article does indeed fail WP:Entertainer, it meets WP:GNG and WP:Notability, which override WP:Entertainer, as WP:Entertainer is merely an additional point of entry for notability, not a replacement of the general notability guidelines. The individual has multiple, non-trivial, media mentions in reliable sources (listed below) that establish notability sufficient to merit inclusion in Wikipedia.
- http://www.newsshopper.co.uk/leisure/4071335.Interview__Mike_Wozniak/ (interview with media outlet)
- http://www.chortle.co.uk/comics/m/33410/mike_wozniak (trivial mention but lends weight)
- http://www.edfringe.com/shows/detail.php?action=shows&id=1480 (trivial mention but lends weight)
- http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/comedy/reviews/mike-wozniak-medina--negociants-edinburgh-festival-901745.html (a review by a major newspaper)
- http://www.spoonfed.co.uk/artist/comedy-1524/mike-wozniak-17603/ (significant mention is less reliable media)
In light of the sources, I think the individual is marginally notable, sufficient for inclusion in Wikipedia. Since I can certainly see how one might disagree, feel free to nominate for deletion via AfD. I think the article needs work, not deletion. Jo7hs2 (talk) 01:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mike Wozniak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090311015158/http://www.ifcomedy.com/newcomers.html to http://www.ifcomedy.com/newcomers.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.timeout.com/london/comedy/blog/5450/Mike_Wozniak-Medina_Negociants.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090516074251/http://www.amusedmoose.com/article/amusedmoose_laughoff_awards.html to http://www.amusedmoose.com/article/amusedmoose_laughoff_awards.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Spoiler/no source given
I don't understand why my edit was undone.
1. Having a spoiler to a series that hasn't even finished airing yet is surely a terrible addition to an article? 2. There's not even a source and I couldn't find any proof that he actually won series 11 of Taskmaster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SilverEye91 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2021
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove the information that Mike won Series 11 of Taskmaster, or at least put in a spoiler tag. Series 11 hasn't fully aired yet and there is no source, or any easily accessible information that he has won. Wikipedia articles for the contestants on Taskmaster are frequently visited when the audience doesn't know the people. To have a wikipedia article feature such a prominent spoiler to a show that it is not even possible to have legally seen yet makes for a very bad wikipedia article. When said spoiler doesn't even have a source it becomes even more questionable and is essentially a rumor.
I would also like to say to whoever keeps reverting the edits: Please talk, don't just do. It is very frustrating when you're having, what you feel was, a good edited reverted with no explanation. SilverEye91 (talk) 19:57, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- @SilverEye91: It seems this is all sorted now. Because the content was not sourced, it was removed and an admin has protected the article to prevent further disruption. For future reference per WP:SPOILER, generally spoilers are allowed and should not be removed if appropriately sourced. S0091 (talk) 20:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- @S0091: I understand that spoilers should be allowed on Wikipedia articles and I don't wish to imply that I have a problem with those as a general rule. However, spoilers before said source is even out is a different thing entirely. Especially when they aren't sourced. Seems more like vandalism at that stage. But thanks for clearing it up anyway!
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of actors and filmmakers
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles needing filmographies
- Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Comedy articles
- Unknown-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles