Talk:Space Force (TV series): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:47, 26 April 2021

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Space Force (TV series) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Television C‑class Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Comedy C‑class Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:

The Pentagon Scene

We see Dan Bakkedahl speaking with military officials. This appears to be a meeting of all the U.S. Armed Forces leaders. I'm thinking that Dan is the Secretary of Defense and not Fred Willard. Also, Patrick Warburton is the Commandant of the Marine Corps, Diedrich Bader is Army Chief of Staff, and Noah Emmerich is Air Force Chief of Staff. This is only speculation, but certainly more likely than what's currently listed on the main page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.159.23.1 (talk) 22:09, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We don't add speculations/assumptions on Wikipedia. — YoungForever^(talk) 00:37, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's no proof that Fred Willard is SECDEF or Noah Emmerich is CJCS though?--46.208.13.55 (talk) 19:23, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

US Military Could Lose Space Force Trademark to Netflix Series

https://www.cbr.com/us-military-lose-space-force-trademark-netflix/

John Cummings (talk) 15:15, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m honestly not sure the relevance of that article. It’s pretty light on substantial details and has a number of factual errors (for instance the U.S. Space Force was established before the show premiered, even though the article says the opposite). What are you suggesting we do with it?Garuda28 (talk) 15:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Garuda28:

It was interesting and wasn't sure how to include it, looks like other sources are covering it with more concrete detail e.g

Thanks

John Cummings (talk) 21:02, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@John Cummings: I looked through the Hollywood Reporter one, and it seems the most accurate (was also the first to post). It’s certainly interesting to ponder, but I’m not sure it makes sense to include in the main space unless Nexflix and the government really do go to court over this. Garuda28 (talk) 22:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Garuda28: sure, well if they do hopefully someone will find these references useful.John Cummings (talk) 22:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Cast" section "too detailed"?

"This section may be too long and excessively detailed." It could seem that way to people with no interest in the show—but it seems fine to me, WP-wise. – AndyFielding (talk) 22:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is too detailed. It seems to include people with out significant roles. Knope7 (talk) 23:47, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 == "Cast" section "too detailed"? ==
 ''"This section may be too long and excessively detailed."'' It could seem that way to people with no interest in the show—but it seems fine to me, WP-wise. – [[User:AndyFielding|AndyFielding]] ([[User talk:AndyFielding|talk]]) 22:35, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
+:I think it is too detailed. It seems to include people with out significant roles. [[User:Knope7|Knope7]] ([[User talk:Knope7|talk]]) 23:47, 26 April 2021 (UTC)