User talk:MountainTraveler

Welcome!

Hello, MountainTraveler, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:04, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Sources are required

Please do not restore your preferred content to Psilocybin mushroom without also including a reliable source that verifies your statement that "psilocybin use can include hallucinations which are unwanted or overwhelming or more rarely, an apparent inability to discern fantasy from reality." Thank you, -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:21, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

You first. There is obviously no citation that will verify what it currently says.— Preceding unsigned comment added by MountainTraveler (talk • contribs)

Then begin a discussion on the talk page outlining your concerns and get consensus for the changes you wish to make. The onus is on the editor wishing to add or change material to support their changes with reliable sources, and when your edits are reverted you need to get consensus for them through talk page discussion. These are the basic requirements of dispute resolution and the standard Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:32, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Terence McKenna. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Your sources do not discuss the subject of the article. Doug Weller talk 19:35, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi MountainTraveler,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 16:25, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi MountainTraveler,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi MountainTraveler,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Sources are required (once again)

Please read the Wikipedia policies on verifiability and reliable sources, which were already given to you at the outset in your welcome above. Even though other editors have already asked you above to conform to these two key Wikipedia policies, you are continuing to ignore them. Specifically, please provide reliable sources for the additions you made here. If you cannot find independent reliable sources, and in fact you just added stuff that you made up yourself, then you should remove your additions because you are engaging in original research. It is irrelevant whether what you added is true or false. Wikipedia is not the place for original (that is, unverified) research. — Epipelagic (talk) 10:43, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

I put sources..

What you said is completely untrue. Sources were already listed. I was just correcting the information extracted from them. All new information had sources besides the cannabis statement which already includes a citation needed note.

Ref

Does not say "dream"... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

I don't care. They're wrong. Anybody who knows what a trance is would ever relate it back to an anesthetic effect.

This is not how Wikipedia works. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

You can't just put up misinformation just because you have a hack source. Change it or get rid of it.

Here is the source https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21256625/ which is not "a hack source". Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

I already saw the source and it's wrong. Nice try though.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:04, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Warning

Please do not misrepresent sources. The exchange above does not inspire confidence. Please note that disruptive or tendentious editing may be remedied with sanctions. El_C 22:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Already there

There was already a discussion on the cartel talk page before your last revert, which tells me you didn't even bother to check. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:08, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Aryan Brotherhood, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 06:56, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Entheogen

not all entheogenic use is related to spiritual development. They are also used for sorcery and maleficium

But given the left-hand path and right-hand path, and the debate over its category and definition, isn't that an irrelevant distinction? Perhaps the problem here is what is meant by spiritual development, a mostly archaic term that has little meaning. The fact is, history supports your position, with ancient magical texts showing the use of drugs like cannabis, if that can be called an entheogen. See for example: suffumigation. Viriditas (talk) 08:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

I was mostly referring to nightshade entheogens like datura, henbane, belladonna, etc. Deliriants. The spiritual development has a hyperlink too I believe. MountainTraveler (talk) 10:43, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Hello, I'm Spyder212. An edit that you recently made to Cocaine intoxication seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!Template:Z191 Spyder212 (talk) 02:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Zetas

Hi. Could you please add reliable sources for the changes you made to Los Zetas? I reverted the material for now. MX (✉ • ✎) 16:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Plagiarism

Hi there. I noticed that you copied some info you added in Los Zetas's page directly from the source. This is not allowed on Wikipedia since it is considered a copyright violation. Please write stuff in your own words using appropriate sources. Thanks! MX (✉ • ✎) 04:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deliriant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aconite. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Overlinking

Have you even read the MOS? If there is a specific term you want to discuss, then discuss it. But all this needless linking is ridiculous. Niteshift36 (talk) 19:19, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Propagandist?

I'd love to hear you explain how that fits and isn't a personal attack. I'll wait. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 20:33, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 20:47, 27 April 2021 (UTC)