Jump to content

Talk:Baden culture: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 20: Line 20:


== Indo-European ==
== Indo-European ==

Is there anyone alive today who "seeks the Indo-European homeland in central Europe", as this article puts it? See the range of modern [[Proto-Indo-European Urheimat hypotheses]].--[[User:Wetman|Wetman]] ([[User talk:Wetman|talk]]) 19:50, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Is there anyone alive today who "seeks the Indo-European homeland in central Europe", as this article puts it? See the range of modern [[Proto-Indo-European Urheimat hypotheses]].--[[User:Wetman|Wetman]] ([[User talk:Wetman|talk]]) 19:50, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
: You obviously cannot read. There is no word about the "homeland".[[User:HJJHolm|HJJHolm]] ([[User talk:HJJHolm|talk]]) 07:36, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
: You obviously cannot read. There is no word about the "homeland".[[User:HJJHolm|HJJHolm]] ([[User talk:HJJHolm|talk]]) 07:36, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
::{{ping|HJJHolm}} Um, there totally is. The part about the Indo-European homeland has been in the article all the time. --[[User:Florian Blaschke|Florian Blaschke]] ([[User talk:Florian Blaschke|talk]]) 21:23, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
::{{ping|HJJHolm}} Um, there totally is. The part about the Indo-European homeland has been in the article all the time. --[[User:Florian Blaschke|Florian Blaschke]] ([[User talk:Florian Blaschke|talk]]) 21:23, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
:: Correct, however, not in the sense meant by the question. [[User:HJJHolm|HJJHolm]] ([[User talk:HJJHolm|talk]]) 14:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
:: Correct, however, not in the sense meant by the question. [[User:HJJHolm|HJJHolm]] ([[User talk:HJJHolm|talk]]) 14:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
"For proponents of the older theory that seeks the Indo-European homeland in central Europe in the area occupied by the preceding [[Funnelbeaker culture]], it is similarly considered Indo-European." - Which "older theory"??? Mallory's "citation" of Schmid was/is in error. To my not too bad knowledge there are - except NAZI theories - no others claiming a central European Urheimat.[[Special:Contributions/2A02:8108:963F:F853:D1E1:FB13:378:989A|2A02:8108:963F:F853:D1E1:FB13:378:989A]] ([[User talk:2A02:8108:963F:F853:D1E1:FB13:378:989A|talk]]) 07:12, 13 May 2019 (UTC)


== Chronology outdated ==
== Chronology outdated ==

Revision as of 07:37, 2 May 2021

[Untitled]

What are the related cultures in Turkey? Gow 14:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

re:
Classical Baden = Ezero - phase A (Bulgaria) = Foltești - Cernavodă I/II - Coţofeni culture (Romania)

this oldest phase was synchronized with pre-Troyan horizon in Turkey (e.g. Kültepe Ib /speaking about culture/ - e.g. synchronization with Alacahöyük XIII-IX = Tepe Gawra XI A = Amuq F = later Uruk culture = etc...)

Late Baden = Ezero AB / Ezero B (early)(Bulgaria) = Cernavodă 3 (Romania)= Troy I (early phases)

Post Baden (cultural groups like Bosaca) = Ezero- phase B (final phases) = Troy I (late phases)

(Arxi (talk) 20:47, 23 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Indo-European

Is there anyone alive today who "seeks the Indo-European homeland in central Europe", as this article puts it? See the range of modern Proto-Indo-European Urheimat hypotheses.--Wetman (talk) 19:50, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You obviously cannot read. There is no word about the "homeland".HJJHolm (talk) 07:36, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@HJJHolm: Um, there totally is. The part about the Indo-European homeland has been in the article all the time. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 21:23, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Correct, however, not in the sense meant by the question. HJJHolm (talk) 14:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"For proponents of the older theory that seeks the Indo-European homeland in central Europe in the area occupied by the preceding Funnelbeaker culture, it is similarly considered Indo-European." - Which "older theory"??? Mallory's "citation" of Schmid was/is in error. To my not too bad knowledge there are - except NAZI theories - no others claiming a central European Urheimat.2A02:8108:963F:F853:D1E1:FB13:378:989A (talk) 07:12, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology outdated

The chronology is severely outdated. See the newest radiocarbon dates in the de.wikipedia! HJJHolm (talk) 07:34, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]