User talk:Littleb2009: Difference between revisions
Littleb2009 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
idiota! Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 225: | Line 225: | ||
It's not vandalism.... I was just asking genuene question about whether an article I wrote counted notable? [[Special:Contributions/72.76.95.136|72.76.95.136]] ([[User talk:72.76.95.136|talk]]) 22:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC) |
It's not vandalism.... I was just asking genuene question about whether an article I wrote counted notable? [[Special:Contributions/72.76.95.136|72.76.95.136]] ([[User talk:72.76.95.136|talk]]) 22:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC) |
||
:Don't ask me as if I was [[Omniscience|omniscient]]. --[[User:Littleb2009|<span style="color:blue;">'''littleb'''</span><span style="color:red;">2009</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Littleb2009|<span style="color:green;">Have a chat?</span>]]</sup> 22:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC) |
:Don't ask me as if I was [[Omniscience|omniscient]]. --[[User:Littleb2009|<span style="color:blue;">'''littleb'''</span><span style="color:red;">2009</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Littleb2009|<span style="color:green;">Have a chat?</span>]]</sup> 22:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC) |
||
idiota! |
Revision as of 18:47, 28 May 2021
![]() | Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify her! |
vn-4 | This user talk page has been vandalized 4 times. |
Before you post:
- If you're trying to tell me about a small mistake I made, revert it and kindly leave me alone. If I have any questions, I will ask you on the talk page of the article in which I made the mistake. Of course, whack me with a trout if I really need it.
- Awards go in User talk:Littleb2009/Awards; it makes it easier for me to archive the page.
- If you want to insult me, please close this tab with this page on it and read WP:NPA, ten times in a row. (Yes, ten.)
Archives
Archives listed below, by archive number. 1
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot (4)
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:23, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Trouted (2)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: restoring uncited challenged text, without supplying RS refs, per wp:burden. 2603:7000:2143:8500:255C:D7EC:A4A2:97C6 (talk) 00:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Please point out the specific edit in which this happened. --littleb2009Have a chat? 00:36, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- You reverted this. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meshary_Al-Arada&diff=prev&oldid=1024411132 --2603:7000:2143:8500:255C:D7EC:A4A2:97C6 (talk) 00:39, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- I'd really like to point out that this is not a BLP because the person that the article is about had died in 2018. Consequently, it would be a better idea to add {{Citation needed}} tags (which look like this:[citation needed]) instead of deleting the text. --littleb2009Have a chat? 00:45, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Also, come on, why does reverting non-constructive edits get this complicated?
- wp:burden does not apply only to blps. And it states clearly "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." That is clear - it is not the least bit complicated. A failure to edit in accord with wp:burden is problematic. Especially when one uses tools to do so. 2603:7000:2143:8500:255C:D7EC:A4A2:97C6 (talk) 00:54, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hey, if I revert a constructive edit because it was in the middle of several vandal edits, then go straight ahead and restore the constructive edit. I always discuss; I don't edit war.
- wp:burden does not apply only to blps. And it states clearly "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." That is clear - it is not the least bit complicated. A failure to edit in accord with wp:burden is problematic. Especially when one uses tools to do so. 2603:7000:2143:8500:255C:D7EC:A4A2:97C6 (talk) 00:54, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- You reverted this. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meshary_Al-Arada&diff=prev&oldid=1024411132 --2603:7000:2143:8500:255C:D7EC:A4A2:97C6 (talk) 00:39, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
Its not vandalism
It's not vandalism.... I was just asking genuene question about whether an article I wrote counted notable? 72.76.95.136 (talk) 22:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
- Don't ask me as if I was omniscient. --littleb2009Have a chat? 22:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
idiota!