Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajith Kumar: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AgentCody (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 25: Line 25:
*'''Keep''' Due to filmography as an actor. [[User:Dr. Universe|Dr. Universe]] ([[User talk:Dr. Universe|talk]]) 04:15, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' Due to filmography as an actor. [[User:Dr. Universe|Dr. Universe]] ([[User talk:Dr. Universe|talk]]) 04:15, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
*:On what basis he pass [[WP:NACTOR]]? Have a look at [[Rajith Kumar #Filmography|this]] section. The added items are not films, those are talk shows and short films. He has not acted in a single film yet. Thus the subject fails [[WP:NACTOR]] [[User:Powerful Karma|Powerful Karma]] ([[User talk:Powerful Karma|talk]]) 01:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
*:On what basis he pass [[WP:NACTOR]]? Have a look at [[Rajith Kumar #Filmography|this]] section. The added items are not films, those are talk shows and short films. He has not acted in a single film yet. Thus the subject fails [[WP:NACTOR]] [[User:Powerful Karma|Powerful Karma]] ([[User talk:Powerful Karma|talk]]) 01:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
*'''Delete''': According to the arguments by nom. As a reply to above comment, he does not have any notable roles in multiple number of movies, failing [[WP:NACTOR]]. [[User:Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla|<b style="color:Purple">Pillechan</b><sup style="color:#707"></sup>]] [[User talk:Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla|<span style="color:#00F">''(പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ)''</span>]] 09:36, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:36, 30 May 2021

Rajith Kumar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think the subject does not meet WP:GNG. He didn't win any reality TV shows. So that's also out. It is clear there are no grounds for WP:PROF. And no major lead roles in any films, thus fails WP:NACTOR too. The article is mainly about the controversies and his participation in Bigg Boss (Malayalam season 2). The awards won by the subject is not at all notable. Powerful Karma (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Powerful Karma (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
So he is notable for simply making controversies? There are no grounds on WP:PROF. No victory at Big Boss or no major lead roles so no WP:NACTOR. Do we want to say that he is simply notable for making controversial statements? I feel that is slightly absurd. Yes, media will cover and continuously write about such things giving him coverage, but common sense says that making controversial statements doesn't indicate notability. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 06:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:GNG and WP:BIO, one does not have to be notable for anything. All that is required for notability is that the person receive significant coverage from multiple independent reliable sources, and that is the case here. Nsk92 (talk) 11:29, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:11, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]