Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2007 January 28: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→[[:Image:IMG_0534.jpg]]: - oppose deletion |
|||
Line 150: | Line 150: | ||
:<span class="plainlinksneverexpand lx">[[:Image:{{ucfirst:IMG_0534.jpg}}]] <tt>(</tt>[{{fullurl:Image:IMG_0534.jpg|action=delete}} delete]<tt>|</tt>[[Image talk:{{ucfirst:IMG_0534.jpg}}|talk]]<tt>|</tt>[{{fullurl::Image:{{ucfirst:IMG_0534.jpg}}|action=history}} history]<tt>|</tt>[{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode::Image:{{ucfirst:IMG_0534.jpg}}}}}} logs]<tt>)</tt></span> - uploaded by [[User talk:SeBASTa#Image:IMG_0534.jpg listed for deletion|SeBASTa]] (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User talk:SeBASTa|action=edit}} notify]</span> | [[Special:Contributions/SeBASTa|contribs]]). |
:<span class="plainlinksneverexpand lx">[[:Image:{{ucfirst:IMG_0534.jpg}}]] <tt>(</tt>[{{fullurl:Image:IMG_0534.jpg|action=delete}} delete]<tt>|</tt>[[Image talk:{{ucfirst:IMG_0534.jpg}}|talk]]<tt>|</tt>[{{fullurl::Image:{{ucfirst:IMG_0534.jpg}}|action=history}} history]<tt>|</tt>[{{fullurl:Special:Log|page={{urlencode::Image:{{ucfirst:IMG_0534.jpg}}}}}} logs]<tt>)</tt></span> - uploaded by [[User talk:SeBASTa#Image:IMG_0534.jpg listed for deletion|SeBASTa]] (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:User talk:SeBASTa|action=edit}} notify]</span> | [[Special:Contributions/SeBASTa|contribs]]). |
||
*orphaned image, absent uploader, I question the PD license [[User:Gay Cdn]] <small>[[User talk:Gay Cdn|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Gay Cdn|(Contr)]]</small> 03:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
*orphaned image, absent uploader, I question the PD license [[User:Gay Cdn]] <small>[[User talk:Gay Cdn|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Gay Cdn|(Contr)]]</small> 03:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''' - No longer an orphaned imaged. Adds to the quality of an article in which the subjects are pictured. Appears to be a valid use of PD licensing. [[User:Luckyluke|Luke!]] 18:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
====[[:Image:Drivas.jpg]]==== |
====[[:Image:Drivas.jpg]]==== |
Revision as of 18:17, 28 January 2007
January 28
- This logo was replaced by Image:FrankCicciLogo.jpg. This is no longer needed. --D-Day 14:52, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, UE orphaned image and hasn't been used for a while — UDHSS 00:01, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Delete unless its going to be used in the correct article. Tellyaddict 12:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, LQ, UE orphaned image and hasn't been used for a while — UDHSS 00:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, LQ, UE orphaned image and hasn't been used for a while — UDHSS 00:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom -- Tellyaddict 12:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, LQ, UE orphaned and low quality image and hasn't been used for a while — UDHSS 00:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, LQ, UE orphaned image and hasn't been used for a while — UDHSS 00:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, LQ, UE orphaned image and hasn't been used for a while — UDHSS 00:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, LQ, UE orphaned image and hasn't been used for a while — UDHSS 00:20, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wallerberjazz (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- OR, UE orphaned and un-encyclopediac image and hasn't been used for a while — UDHSS 00:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sara mulholland (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
*orpahned, yet another penis picture User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I'm not even going to look at this picture as it's obviously gonig to be DISGUSTING -- Tellyaddict 12:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - I have an issue with you !voting for delete if you have not even looked at the image. Also, I am removing my support for deletion as in my current review I have determined a very encyclopedic use of the image at micropenis and the talk page specifically requests an image be added.--User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 15:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep There seems to be some controversy about whether this illustrates the article (see edit summary on removal), but it should be sorted out. --TeaDrinker 17:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- orpahned, yet another nipple picture User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- This is an image in an article that was just ridiculous, supposedly illustrating an erect nipple but instead showed a full breast. I cropped the image and re-uploaded it. Feel free to delete away. CyberAnth 00:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Bennyharvey327 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orpahned, absent uploader, yet another penis picture User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Bennyharvey327 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orpahned, absent uploader, yet another penis picture User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Bennyharvey327 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orpahned, absent uploader, yet another penis picture User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Walchop825 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orpahned, absent uploader, yet another penis picture User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Xconstrictor (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 00:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This image is unencyclopedic as mentioned by nominator. Tellyaddict 12:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Orphan, not sure what the deal is with this photo, but it doesn't appear to be freely licensed. —Bkell (talk) 01:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- UE, as well as per nom -- Tellyaddict 12:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Kim.dawson (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, no license given, but text indicates it is used with permission of the source User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- article was deleted orphan Balloonguy 01:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- orphan article deleted Balloonguy 01:46, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Steff infidel (notify | Contributions/Steff infidel). - uploaded by
- orphan article delted for notablity Balloonguy 01:48, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Wasen't this image here the other day? definitely delete as its UE. Tellyaddict 12:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Andrew Plumb (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Pssible Keep This image is quite detailed and good, the only thing is its very small so if the user returns you could aks him/her to upload a larger version. Tellyaddict 12:46, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Jessamynit (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Jessamynit (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Registering (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 02:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Requiemfordante (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, I question PD claim - it reminds me of a movie image from something User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 03:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Fiehnphoto (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, questionable PD claim User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 03:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, sole contribution of uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 03:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sexyman1971 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 03:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Prakanthi2003 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, sole contributionof user, uncyclopedic photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 03:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, I question the PD license User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 03:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - No longer an orphaned imaged. Adds to the quality of an article in which the subjects are pictured. Appears to be a valid use of PD licensing. Luke! 18:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 03:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- orphaned image, absent uploader, insufficent information to determine an encyclopedic use User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 03:18, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Trevor100a (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- UE Vanity image - Infofreak 04:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Jersey Devil (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image:Poverty Rates in Newark, New Jersey in 2003 graph.png made this image obsolete. This old image is no longer used. —Remember the dot (t) 05:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Jersey Devil (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image:Educational Attainment of People in Newark, New Jersey in 2003 graph.png made this image obsolete. This old image is no longer used. —Remember the dot (t) 05:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Tapas laha (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Useless image, part of the strange {{Tapas: Tapas Laha, Ph.D., http://students.eng.fiu.edu/~tlaha/}} — -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 07:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ansbachdragoner (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- 34SSLSNL.jpg - obsoleted by 34.SS-Freiwilligen-Grenadier-Division.svg — Luke Roberts 07:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ansbachdragoner (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- 6SSLMDivSymb.jpg - obsoleted by 27. SS-Freiwilligen Grenadier Division.svg — Luke Roberts 07:51, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Apparently copyrighted per the uploader. No fair use. — —Brim 08:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Pablosecca (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image has been obsoleted by Image:Iraqattacksasofjuly2006.png. The old image is no longer used. — SeanAhern 12:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC).
- Orphaned, uploaded five years ago, doesn't seem like it's going to be on any article. — Tellyaddict 15:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC).
- orphaned image, sole contribution of user, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 15:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- DavidShankBone (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Image not used in articles, low quality, no indication that people in photo have given permission for use — — Atom 15:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC).
- The image is 1280x960, which is not low quality; the people were models there to be photographed, so no "permission" need be given--where do you get that from?-- and it is only not used in articles because you deleted it from the articles, with no discussion (against policy). --DavidShankBone 15:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Whatever else may be true, the number of pixels wide an image is does not define whether or not it is of good quality. Things like focus matter as well. This image is not in focus. Moreover, if viewed at full resolution, there is obvious pixelation, so clearly it isn't even really a 1280x960 image, but a smaller one which was blown up. Sorry. --Strait 17:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Not true - there was no cropping of the photograph, so it's at its original size. As for quality, some of the focus issues are easy to correct; I have other photographs of the same scene that don't wrestle with any focus problems, although I don't find them particularly problematic. Another editor commented that the photo should remain on the page under the RfC that Atom put up (Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Self_promotion). --DavidShankBone 17:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Whatever else may be true, the number of pixels wide an image is does not define whether or not it is of good quality. Things like focus matter as well. This image is not in focus. Moreover, if viewed at full resolution, there is obvious pixelation, so clearly it isn't even really a 1280x960 image, but a smaller one which was blown up. Sorry. --Strait 17:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- The image is 1280x960, which is not low quality; the people were models there to be photographed, so no "permission" need be given--where do you get that from?-- and it is only not used in articles because you deleted it from the articles, with no discussion (against policy). --DavidShankBone 15:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- High resolution is different than high quality. I don't care what resolution it is, and that has nothing to do with whether the image should be deleted, or not. The image has been inserted into an article now. Debate is ongoing as to whether the editors of that article want it there. The primary issue is whether the women in this picture have given permission to have their photograph published. This IfD is a forum for establishing that. The other editor that you discuss can feel free to comment here. If you took a photo at a public event, then you have a right to the photo, but not a right to publish it. If I am mistaken about that, please explain that to me. Atom 18:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Please first explain which Wikipedia policies are informing your discussion. --DavidShankBone 18:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Derrty2033 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, questionable PD claim as I believe it should be {{software-screenshot}}, plus, very small to make review difficult User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 15:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Derrty2033 (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 15:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Damnedkingdom (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- LQ, OR - doesn't look like its going to be used — Tellyaddict 15:48, 28 January 2007 (UTC).
- Justingerstner (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- orphaned image, absent user, questionable PD claim, believe used in a deleted band bio article User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 15:48, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- CV, marked as GFDL-self, taken from a blog. — Mosmof 16:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- CV, marked as GFDL-self, taken from a blog. — Mosmof 16:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Shubhamdixit (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- These are very poor quality scans of pages of text. Claim of PD is questionable. They are all orphaned and the files are large (some as big as 6MB) — User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 16:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC).
Also included are:
- Image:1857-P-3-C-3.pdf
- Image:1857-P-3-C-2.PDF
- Image:1857-P3-C-1.pdf
- Image:1857-P-2-C-10.PDF
- Image:1857P2-C-9.PDF
- Image:1857-P-2-C-7.PDF
- Image:1857-P-2-C-6.PDF
- Image:1857-P-2-C-5.PDF
- Image:1857-P-2-C-4.PDF
- Image:1857-P-2-C-1-2.PDF
- Image:1857-P1-C-5-6.PDF
- Image:1857-P-1-C-3-4.PDF
- Image:1857-P-1-C-1-2.pdf
- Image:SGEPAGE26-51.PDF
- Image:SGEPAGE0-25.pdf
- Image:Lfa.pdf
- Image:Hindutva-pg46-91.PDF
- Image:Hindutva-pg1-45.PDF
- JeremiahJude (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Claimed GFDL without sufficient evidence while the source website http://www.stinerichard.com/ says "all reghts reserved". The same image has been uploaded twice and deleted twice before. — Jusjih 16:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sheehanmds (notify | contribs). - uploaded by
- Orphan, unencyclopedic (article for future movie was deleted twice through AfD) — BigrTex 16:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)