Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CallMeCarson (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*:I think we should all be in agreement that the article should be deleted per the guideline stated. There isn't much notability other than the allegations; thus, it should be deleted per [[WP:BLPCRIME]]. [[User:L33tm4n|L33tm4n]] ([[User talk:L33tm4n|talk]]) 23:36, 16 August 2021 (UTC) |
*:I think we should all be in agreement that the article should be deleted per the guideline stated. There isn't much notability other than the allegations; thus, it should be deleted per [[WP:BLPCRIME]]. [[User:L33tm4n|L33tm4n]] ([[User talk:L33tm4n|talk]]) 23:36, 16 August 2021 (UTC) |
||
* 🤠 welp [[User:Theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[User talk:Theleekycauldron|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Theleekycauldron|contribs]]) ([[Singular they|they/them]]) 23:50, 16 August 2021 (UTC) |
* 🤠 welp [[User:Theleekycauldron|theleekycauldron]] ([[User talk:Theleekycauldron|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Theleekycauldron|contribs]]) ([[Singular they|they/them]]) 23:50, 16 August 2021 (UTC) |
||
* I vote delete. It's unfortunate that his only notable thing about him can't even be mentioned on his page. [[User:DreamlessGlare|DreamlessGlare]] ([[User talk:DreamlessGlare|talk]]) 00:27, 17 August 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:27, 17 August 2021
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CallMeCarson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not an endorsement of deletion, but I'm opening this as a way to progress things forwards. It seems that most editors are agreed that CallMeCarson's main claim to notability is the allegations of sexual impropriety made against him in such articles as Daily Dot and Insider; however, they disagree on whether the allegations should be included or the article deleted. The reason for exclusion of the allegations would be WP:BLPCRIME. A previous AFD in January with no different sources, but not huge participation, concluded keep. — Bilorv (talk) 23:18, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. — Bilorv (talk) 23:18, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Bilorv (talk) 23:18, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Bilorv (talk) 23:18, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- Pinging participants of the talk page discussions: Theleekycauldron, DreamlessGlare, P37307, TrueQuantum, HTGS, Otr500, L33tm4n, PraiseVivec, Bangalamania, Xoltered. — Bilorv (talk) 23:23, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- I think we should all be in agreement that the article should be deleted per the guideline stated. There isn't much notability other than the allegations; thus, it should be deleted per WP:BLPCRIME. L33tm4n (talk) 23:36, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- 🤠 welp theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 23:50, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- I vote delete. It's unfortunate that his only notable thing about him can't even be mentioned on his page. DreamlessGlare (talk) 00:27, 17 August 2021 (UTC)