User talk:A.A Prinon

Archives (Index) header 2021/February 2021/March 2021/April 2021/May 2021/June 2021/July 2021/August 2021/September This page is archived by ClueBot III. Unblock request This user is asking that his block be reviewed: A.A Prinon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Alright, I'll try to address these comments here, since clearly nobody is reading what I've already written about this elsewhere. First, @Lugnuts: Look, I very clearly know the reason why you seldom get frustrated or feel harassed. The thing is- you find it disconcerting to have me show up hours or days after you make an edit, right? But if you think a little or ignore these, it's not a big issue at all. I just make a few edits (30-50 or at best 80) per day, while I don't think that you just stick to a very few edits per day. I have reviewed the diffs you linked at User talk:Sasquatch#Lugnuts. On 10 July 2021, I had total 2 interactions with you, one this and the other this. In the very next day (11 July), I had had the same number of interactions (2) with you. The clincher for me is, when I make about 50 edits per day, I only have 2 interactions with you, then how you can believe that it is hounding? If I was following your edits, I would always keep my eye on those and edit according to your contributions, while I am not doing this. I guess you make a lot of edits in a single day, hence can you explain to me the reason for feeling harassed with just 2 interactions with me in a day? Actually, if we keep fighting with each other and keep accusing, then we will never be able to improve the encyclopedia, rather we would all be dead by then. We both work in the same project (cricket) and our goals are also the same- improving the cricket articles. Hence, in my book, interactions and overlaps are very normal or simple, if you are being positive. But if you are always thinking negatively, it will neither help you nor the Wikipedia, rather it will act as a barrier in improving WP, particularly cricket articles. I will suggest you to forget all hostilities with me and collaboratively edit with me, will you? It is actually very easy and also helpful. Tell me one thing- do you only face interactions with me, don't you see overlaps with other editors. I guess yes, but you don't feel harassed when you are interacting with them, but you are feeling annoyed when interacting with me, and the main reason for that is we keep fighting with each other. In other words, lets stop fighting and starting disputes among ourselves, rather let us work here collaboratively. I believe it will help both of us as well as help in reducing annoyance and distress. Trust me, I had zero intentions in causing you annoyance, as I appreciate your work here. Yes, my contributions may not be as helpful as yours are, but I believe I have done some good or productive work for the project. Example, recently on 31st July, one of my articles got promoted to featured list (!), sadly I can't celebrate it anyway because of being blocked. The previous incident I had with you on 1 July 2021 was not acceptable, I agree. Actually, as you were reverting my good edits in some articles, I felt anger and so made this and this edit summaries. Agree I should not have done it, but since then I was unblocked, I largely changed my nature or tendency. My contribs clears it all, on 1 July I had many interactions with you and were reverting your edits. However, it wasn't as same as after being unblocked, I have made only 2 overlaps with you. I am really sorry, if I have caused you very much distress or if it was preventing you from working here. But, I think we should draw a line under this and make progress forward. As I have said already elsewhere, I had been always making such type of edits (which are cited at Sasquatch talk). That includes- updates based on match reports, infobox stats update or anything else. I have already cited those above, hope it helps. Thank you and please Lugnuts reply here — A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 06:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC) Notes: In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator. Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time. Administrator use only: If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin: {{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Alright, I'll try to address these comments here, since clearly nobody is reading what I've already written about this elsewhere. First, <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Lugnuts|Lugnuts]]:</span> Look, I very clearly know the reason why you seldom get frustrated or feel harassed. The thing is- you find it disconcerting to have me show up hours or days after you make an edit, right? But if you think a little or ignore these, it's not a big issue at all. I just make a few edits (30-50 or at best 80) per day, while I don't think that you just stick to a very few edits per day. I have reviewed the diffs you linked at [[User talk:Sasquatch#Lugnuts]]. On 10 July 2021, I had total 2 interactions with you, one [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Takudzwanashe_Kaitano&type=revision&diff=1032866461&oldid=1032802019&diffmode=source this] and the other [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahmudullah&type=revision&diff=1032889506&oldid=1032889077&diffmode=source this]. In the very next day (11 July), I had had the same number of interactions (2) with you. The clincher for me is, when I make about 50 edits per day, I only have 2 interactions with you, then how you can believe that it is [[WP:HOUND|hounding]]? If I was following your edits, I would always keep my eye on those and edit according to your contributions, while I am not doing this. I guess you make a lot of edits in a single day, hence can you explain to me the reason for feeling harassed with just 2 interactions with me in a day? Actually, if we keep fighting with each other and keep accusing, then we will '''never''' be able to improve the encyclopedia, rather we would all be dead by then. We both work in the same project (cricket) and our goals are also the same- improving the cricket articles. Hence, in my book, interactions and overlaps are very normal or simple, if you [[WP:AGF|are being positive]]. But if you are always thinking negatively, it will neither help you nor the Wikipedia, rather it will act as a barrier in improving WP, particularly cricket articles. I will suggest you to forget all hostilities with me and collaboratively edit with me, will you? It is actually very easy and also helpful. Tell me one thing- do you only face interactions with me, don't you see overlaps with other editors. I guess yes, but you don't feel harassed when you are interacting with them, but you are feeling annoyed when interacting with me, and the main reason for that is we keep fighting with each other. In other words, lets stop fighting and starting disputes among ourselves, rather let us work here collaboratively. I believe it will help both of us as well as help in reducing annoyance and distress. Trust me, I had zero intentions in causing you annoyance, as I appreciate your work here. Yes, my contributions may not be as helpful as yours are, but I believe I have done some good or productive work for the project. Example, recently on 31st July, [[List of international cricket centuries at the Sher-e-Bangla National Cricket Stadium|one of my articles]] got promoted to featured list (!), sadly I can't celebrate it anyway because of being blocked. The previous incident I had with you on 1 July 2021 was not acceptable, I agree. Actually, as you were reverting my good edits in some articles, I felt anger and so made [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pakistan_women%27s_cricket_team_in_the_West_Indies_in_2021&type=revision&diff=1031600786&oldid=1031599162&diffmode=source this] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Erasmo_Vera&type=revision&diff=1031602429&oldid=1031598010&diffmode=source this] edit summaries. Agree I should not have done it, but since then I was unblocked, I largely changed my nature or tendency. My contribs clears it all, on 1 July I had many interactions with you and were reverting your edits. However, it wasn't as same as after being unblocked, I have made only 2 overlaps with you. I am really sorry, if I have caused you very much distress or if it was preventing you from working here. But, I think we should draw a line under this and make progress forward. As I have said already elsewhere, I had been always making such type of edits (which are cited at Sasquatch talk). That includes- updates based on match reports, infobox stats update or anything else. I have already cited those above, hope it helps. Thank you and please Lugnuts reply here <span style="white-space:nowrap;">—[[User:A.A Prinon|<span style="background:#0000CD;color:gold;"><b> A.A Prinon </b></span>]] <sup>[[User talk:A.A Prinon|<span style="color:#006400">'''Leave a dialogue'''</span>]]</sup></span> 06:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}} If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined. {{unblock reviewed |1=Alright, I'll try to address these comments here, since clearly nobody is reading what I've already written about this elsewhere. First, <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Lugnuts|Lugnuts]]:</span> Look, I very clearly know the reason why you seldom get frustrated or feel harassed. The thing is- you find it disconcerting to have me show up hours or days after you make an edit, right? But if you think a little or ignore these, it's not a big issue at all. I just make a few edits (30-50 or at best 80) per day, while I don't think that you just stick to a very few edits per day. I have reviewed the diffs you linked at [[User talk:Sasquatch#Lugnuts]]. On 10 July 2021, I had total 2 interactions with you, one [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Takudzwanashe_Kaitano&type=revision&diff=1032866461&oldid=1032802019&diffmode=source this] and the other [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahmudullah&type=revision&diff=1032889506&oldid=1032889077&diffmode=source this]. In the very next day (11 July), I had had the same number of interactions (2) with you. The clincher for me is, when I make about 50 edits per day, I only have 2 interactions with you, then how you can believe that it is [[WP:HOUND|hounding]]? If I was following your edits, I would always keep my eye on those and edit according to your contributions, while I am not doing this. I guess you make a lot of edits in a single day, hence can you explain to me the reason for feeling harassed with just 2 interactions with me in a day? Actually, if we keep fighting with each other and keep accusing, then we will '''never''' be able to improve the encyclopedia, rather we would all be dead by then. We both work in the same project (cricket) and our goals are also the same- improving the cricket articles. Hence, in my book, interactions and overlaps are very normal or simple, if you [[WP:AGF|are being positive]]. But if you are always thinking negatively, it will neither help you nor the Wikipedia, rather it will act as a barrier in improving WP, particularly cricket articles. I will suggest you to forget all hostilities with me and collaboratively edit with me, will you? It is actually very easy and also helpful. Tell me one thing- do you only face interactions with me, don't you see overlaps with other editors. I guess yes, but you don't feel harassed when you are interacting with them, but you are feeling annoyed when interacting with me, and the main reason for that is we keep fighting with each other. In other words, lets stop fighting and starting disputes among ourselves, rather let us work here collaboratively. I believe it will help both of us as well as help in reducing annoyance and distress. Trust me, I had zero intentions in causing you annoyance, as I appreciate your work here. Yes, my contributions may not be as helpful as yours are, but I believe I have done some good or productive work for the project. Example, recently on 31st July, [[List of international cricket centuries at the Sher-e-Bangla National Cricket Stadium|one of my articles]] got promoted to featured list (!), sadly I can't celebrate it anyway because of being blocked. The previous incident I had with you on 1 July 2021 was not acceptable, I agree. Actually, as you were reverting my good edits in some articles, I felt anger and so made [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pakistan_women%27s_cricket_team_in_the_West_Indies_in_2021&type=revision&diff=1031600786&oldid=1031599162&diffmode=source this] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Erasmo_Vera&type=revision&diff=1031602429&oldid=1031598010&diffmode=source this] edit summaries. Agree I should not have done it, but since then I was unblocked, I largely changed my nature or tendency. My contribs clears it all, on 1 July I had many interactions with you and were reverting your edits. However, it wasn't as same as after being unblocked, I have made only 2 overlaps with you. I am really sorry, if I have caused you very much distress or if it was preventing you from working here. But, I think we should draw a line under this and make progress forward. As I have said already elsewhere, I had been always making such type of edits (which are cited at Sasquatch talk). That includes- updates based on match reports, infobox stats update or anything else. I have already cited those above, hope it helps. Thank you and please Lugnuts reply here <span style="white-space:nowrap;">—[[User:A.A Prinon|<span style="background:#0000CD;color:gold;"><b> A.A Prinon </b></span>]] <sup>[[User talk:A.A Prinon|<span style="color:#006400">'''Leave a dialogue'''</span>]]</sup></span> 06:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}} If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale: {{unblock reviewed |1=Alright, I'll try to address these comments here, since clearly nobody is reading what I've already written about this elsewhere. First, <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Lugnuts|Lugnuts]]:</span> Look, I very clearly know the reason why you seldom get frustrated or feel harassed. The thing is- you find it disconcerting to have me show up hours or days after you make an edit, right? But if you think a little or ignore these, it's not a big issue at all. I just make a few edits (30-50 or at best 80) per day, while I don't think that you just stick to a very few edits per day. I have reviewed the diffs you linked at [[User talk:Sasquatch#Lugnuts]]. On 10 July 2021, I had total 2 interactions with you, one [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Takudzwanashe_Kaitano&type=revision&diff=1032866461&oldid=1032802019&diffmode=source this] and the other [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahmudullah&type=revision&diff=1032889506&oldid=1032889077&diffmode=source this]. In the very next day (11 July), I had had the same number of interactions (2) with you. The clincher for me is, when I make about 50 edits per day, I only have 2 interactions with you, then how you can believe that it is [[WP:HOUND|hounding]]? If I was following your edits, I would always keep my eye on those and edit according to your contributions, while I am not doing this. I guess you make a lot of edits in a single day, hence can you explain to me the reason for feeling harassed with just 2 interactions with me in a day? Actually, if we keep fighting with each other and keep accusing, then we will '''never''' be able to improve the encyclopedia, rather we would all be dead by then. We both work in the same project (cricket) and our goals are also the same- improving the cricket articles. Hence, in my book, interactions and overlaps are very normal or simple, if you [[WP:AGF|are being positive]]. But if you are always thinking negatively, it will neither help you nor the Wikipedia, rather it will act as a barrier in improving WP, particularly cricket articles. I will suggest you to forget all hostilities with me and collaboratively edit with me, will you? It is actually very easy and also helpful. Tell me one thing- do you only face interactions with me, don't you see overlaps with other editors. I guess yes, but you don't feel harassed when you are interacting with them, but you are feeling annoyed when interacting with me, and the main reason for that is we keep fighting with each other. In other words, lets stop fighting and starting disputes among ourselves, rather let us work here collaboratively. I believe it will help both of us as well as help in reducing annoyance and distress. Trust me, I had zero intentions in causing you annoyance, as I appreciate your work here. Yes, my contributions may not be as helpful as yours are, but I believe I have done some good or productive work for the project. Example, recently on 31st July, [[List of international cricket centuries at the Sher-e-Bangla National Cricket Stadium|one of my articles]] got promoted to featured list (!), sadly I can't celebrate it anyway because of being blocked. The previous incident I had with you on 1 July 2021 was not acceptable, I agree. Actually, as you were reverting my good edits in some articles, I felt anger and so made [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pakistan_women%27s_cricket_team_in_the_West_Indies_in_2021&type=revision&diff=1031600786&oldid=1031599162&diffmode=source this] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Erasmo_Vera&type=revision&diff=1031602429&oldid=1031598010&diffmode=source this] edit summaries. Agree I should not have done it, but since then I was unblocked, I largely changed my nature or tendency. My contribs clears it all, on 1 July I had many interactions with you and were reverting your edits. However, it wasn't as same as after being unblocked, I have made only 2 overlaps with you. I am really sorry, if I have caused you very much distress or if it was preventing you from working here. But, I think we should draw a line under this and make progress forward. As I have said already elsewhere, I had been always making such type of edits (which are cited at Sasquatch talk). That includes- updates based on match reports, infobox stats update or anything else. I have already cited those above, hope it helps. Thank you and please Lugnuts reply here <span style="white-space:nowrap;">—[[User:A.A Prinon|<span style="background:#0000CD;color:gold;"><b> A.A Prinon </b></span>]] <sup>[[User talk:A.A Prinon|<span style="color:#006400">'''Leave a dialogue'''</span>]]</sup></span> 06:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}} In addition, think a little. such as- If I hadn't made this edit, would people know about this significant record. Again if I didn't made this edit would general readers know about the information. Hence, I am always editing here for the betterment of WP, not to cause you distress particularly. — A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 06:50, 3 August 2021 (UTC) Thank you @আফতাবুজ্জামান: for appreciating my contributions on Wikipedia, by emailing me. You are perhaps the only person to do so. When I had 4 interactions in 4 days (out of my about 320 edits in these 4 days) with a user, admins have blocked me claiming that I was hounding. This is completely biased accusation, or is it enough to justify a block for only 4 interactions, when these types of edits were always made by me. Note: I have not even evaded my block by editing with another account in this meantime, which CheckUsers will able to verify using behavioural or technical data. — A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 05:40, 25 August 2021 (UTC) Well, I think many are enjoying seeing me blocked. 2021 Bangladeshi cricket season, 2021 Arachas Super T20 Trophy, 2021–22 National Cricket League etc many articles created by me are not being updated when I am blocked. So, if I were unblocked, I would just cause damage or disruption, right? @Lugnuts: Do you keep track of such news like this and this? And now, the project is being benefited when most important articles of the project are not being updated. — A.A Prinon  Leave a dialogue 05:53, 25 August 2021 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Scotland cricket navigational boxes A tag has been placed on Category:Scotland cricket navigational boxes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 16:43, 8 August 2021 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:2020–21 National Cricket League Logo.png ⚠ Thanks for uploading File:2020–21 National Cricket League Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:29, 16 August 2021 (UTC)